User talk:Chiswick Chap: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
arch |
Atharaphelun (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
= TALK '''''AFTER''' ANY EXISTING TALK'' = |
= TALK '''''AFTER''' ANY EXISTING TALK'' = |
||
{{Signpost-subscription}} |
{{Signpost-subscription}} |
||
== History of Arda Response == |
|||
:[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] If you refer to [[Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Behavior_that_is_unacceptable|Wikipedia's own guideline for talk pages]], I think you'll find that none of what I've said has violated Wikipedia's code of conduct. On the contrary, you have been failing to follow [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources|Wikipedia's content guideline on reliable sources]] in refusing to fact check the accuracy of the information that was provided to you with the relevant source materials as well as placing greater importance on a secondary source with a provable set of errors when compared with the primary sources. [[User:Atharaphelun|Atharaphelun]] ([[User talk:Atharaphelun|talk]]) 18:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:15, 18 July 2020
PLEASE ADD ANY COMMENTS AT THE END OF THIS PAGE.
Archives
2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 - 2016 - 2017 - 2018 - 2019 - 2020 -
TALK AFTER ANY EXISTING TALK
 |
|---|
| 18 November 2024 |
History of Arda Response
If you refer to Wikipedia's own guideline for talk pages, I think you'll find that none of what I've said has violated Wikipedia's code of conduct. On the contrary, you have been failing to follow Wikipedia's content guideline on reliable sources in refusing to fact check the accuracy of the information that was provided to you with the relevant source materials as well as placing greater importance on a secondary source with a provable set of errors when compared with the primary sources. Atharaphelun (talk) 18:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
