User talk:Highflyingkitty

== edit a thon-ing ==

<p>

“Be kind. We are all humans here.”

Anyone else get involved as a Wikipedian in response to the BLM Movement? Highflyingkitty (talk) 17:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, please reach out to me here for inquiries as to our work and activism on Wikipedia'.

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Highflyingkitty! Thank you for your contributions. I am Grand'mere Eugene and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 23:21, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

DS/Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Jorm (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Hey Jorn, can we solve this? We are here and you do not control us.

August 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 16:29, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Highflyingkitty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Editathon participant who is engaging with editors respectfully, not a crime Highflyingkitty (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Playing the race card to get an unblock never works. Also, there is no evidence of any edit-a-thon, and multiple users from the same IP would not indicate that. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:37, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Spoken like a true oppressor uninterested in the truth, "Rick." Highflyingkitty (talk) 16:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

This is getting flat out racist. We will take to press if not unblocked. Look at how I am being talked to by these editors, please. This is a BIG problem.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Highflyingkitty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

this is not the race card, it is real life and racism is a problem hereHighflyingkitty (talk) 16:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=this is not the race card, it is real life and racism is a problem here[[User:Highflyingkitty|Highflyingkitty]] ([[User talk:Highflyingkitty#top|talk]]) 16:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=this is not the race card, it is real life and racism is a problem here[[User:Highflyingkitty|Highflyingkitty]] ([[User talk:Highflyingkitty#top|talk]]) 16:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=this is not the race card, it is real life and racism is a problem here[[User:Highflyingkitty|Highflyingkitty]] ([[User talk:Highflyingkitty#top|talk]]) 16:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}