Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 August 4: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:{{DRV links|Cup Foods|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 13#Cup Foods|article=}} |
:{{DRV links|Cup Foods|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 13#Cup Foods|article=}} |
||
The only thing this redirect shared with the one deleted with RFD a month and a half ago - an eternity in this content area - is its title. The target was different, the content at the target was radically different, and [[WP:G4]] requires that the content be substantially identical. Further, speedy deletion had already been independently declined by two different admins ([[User:Tavix]] at [[WP:AN#Cup Foods]]; then myself on the redirect itself before seeing the AN section), both saying it needs a new discussion, so it's plainly not uncontroversial. —[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 19:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC) |
The only thing this redirect shared with the one deleted with RFD a month and a half ago - an eternity in this content area - is its title. The target was different, the content at the target was radically different, and [[WP:G4]] requires that the content be substantially identical. Further, speedy deletion had already been independently declined by two different admins ([[User:Tavix]] at [[WP:AN#Cup Foods]]; then myself on the redirect itself before seeing the AN section), both saying it needs a new discussion, so it's plainly not uncontroversial. —[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 19:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
*'''Restore''' per my comment at [[WP:AN]]. Note that I had advocated for keeping the redirect in the prior RfD, so I would be too involved to decline the speedy. --[[User:Tavix| <span style="color:#000080; font-family:georgia">'''T'''avix</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Tavix|<span style="color:#000080; font-family:georgia">talk</span>]])</sup> 21:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC) |
|||
====[[:Blackman in European kitchen]]==== |
====[[:Blackman in European kitchen]]==== |
||
Revision as of 21:43, 4 August 2020
The only thing this redirect shared with the one deleted with RFD a month and a half ago - an eternity in this content area - is its title. The target was different, the content at the target was radically different, and WP:G4 requires that the content be substantially identical. Further, speedy deletion had already been independently declined by two different admins (User:Tavix at WP:AN#Cup Foods; then myself on the redirect itself before seeing the AN section), both saying it needs a new discussion, so it's plainly not uncontroversial. —Cryptic 19:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Restore per my comment at WP:AN. Note that I had advocated for keeping the redirect in the prior RfD, so I would be too involved to decline the speedy. -- Tavix (talk) 21:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
It might be necessary to write this article new, but I would do it only if it is clear, that this is not just promotion with fear of speed-deleting. PeterBraun74 (talk) 06:48, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Looks pretty promotional. No independent sourcing. Would need a total rewrite with information from WP:RS. Please see User:deepfriedokra/g11 for my standard G11 deletion message --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Endorse G11 This was unsourced and in my view rather promotional, and the promotion was already present in early revisions. It also was not clear if it was about the poem or about the poet (Emmanuel Eni), while we have a different article about the poet now also at DRV. There is no bar to recreation, but if recreated, please start with independent, reliable sources, and make the article strictly aboi7ut the poem, not the poet (although of course the poet would need to be mentioned). If I were mentoring an editor wanting to create such an article, I would advise the use of draft space or a userspace draft, but that is a choice, not a requirement. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- DES makes good points. I would recommend WP:AfC just to have the time to develop the page with less likelihood of deletion. Barring further WP:g11 content of course. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- This reads like a machine translation. —Cryptic 15:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Endorse reasonable call, there was plenty of promotional text and if it was all removed there wouldn't be much left. There were other problems with the article, e.g. the subject of the article is a poem, but the opening sentence says it's about a poet. We could restore it to draft space for improvement. Hut 8.5 17:38, 4 August 2020 (UTC)