Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunji Village, Nepal: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 21: Line 21:
*'''Merge''' with [[Gunji, Uttarakhand]]. -[[User:Hatchens|Hatchens]] ([[User talk:Hatchens|talk]]) 04:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' with [[Gunji, Uttarakhand]]. -[[User:Hatchens|Hatchens]] ([[User talk:Hatchens|talk]]) 04:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Nothing to merge, an egregious POVFORK with any mention of India just replaced by Nepal. Both the creator of the FORK and the replier have engaged in disruptive behavior. Not to mention that we treat any location, beyond the article on the main dispute (in this case [[Kalapani territory]]), with only de-facto mentions in articles. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Nothing to merge, an egregious POVFORK with any mention of India just replaced by Nepal. Both the creator of the FORK and the replier have engaged in disruptive behavior. Not to mention that we treat any location, beyond the article on the main dispute (in this case [[Kalapani territory]]), with only de-facto mentions in articles. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 11:20, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
*Both [[Gunji, Uttarakhand]] and [[Gunji Village, Nepal]] should be '''merged''' to '''Gunji Village'''(neutral title and content). Whatever decision will be taken for [[Gunji Village, Nepal]], should be equally applied to [[Gunji, Uttarakhand]]. [[User:Nepal knowledge|Nepal knowledge]] ([[User talk:Nepal knowledge|talk]]) 17:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:31, 7 August 2020

Gunji Village, Nepal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is a WP:POVFORK of Gunji, Uttarakhand, created just to make the point that Nepal has begun to claim it as its territory. See Kuthi Valley. (More of the history is in Kalapani territory, even though this place is not part of that territory.) There is no evidence of Nepali administration at this location for at least 200 years. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Vandalism This article is about territorial dispute and both Nepal and India has this location in their official maps. I think the deletion tag embedes in a political view point which is a conflict of interest. I have requested to protect both Gunji, Uttarakhand and Gunji Village, Nepal for possible vandalism. Please refer Territorial disputes of India and Nepal. Meanwhile, I declear that I am from Nepal but I would have no objection for deletion had it been a GNG or other issues. WP:POVFORK do not apply becuase of the title of the article which is basically claming the land belongs to India. To resoleve, we can put the title as Gunji Village instead and purge existing articles to have WP:NPOV.nirmal (talk) 11:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nirmaljoshi, Is Gunji Village, Nepal the same village as Gunji, Uttarakhand? Or is it a different village? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@User talk:Kautilya3- its exactly the same according to the coordinates. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirmaljoshi (talkcontribs)
That will not comply with WP:NPOV. nirmal (talk) 02:41, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
POV issues, if any, should be settled it at the other page. That's basically what WP:POVFORK says. ("all facts and major points of view on a certain subject should be treated in one article.") In the above comment, I see that you agree that its the same settlement, Hence there should only be one article. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
-There is no question that there should be one article. But the title of the article itself should be Neutral. The current titles in both article are non-neutral- one claiming to be Nepal and another calming to be Uttarakhand (which is a part of India in her political map). nirmal (talk) 01:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]