Jump to content

User talk:LadyiTy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
LadyiTy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
:{{u|Sro23}} I've been looking into her edits, she's a vandalism only account, whereas I added sources and looking through the Tulisa article the other accounts you've blocked were adding correct sourced and reliable information. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 18:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|Sro23}} I've been looking into her edits, she's a vandalism only account, whereas I added sources and looking through the Tulisa article the other accounts you've blocked were adding correct sourced and reliable information. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 18:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
::I rest my case. Obvious sockpuppet. [[User:Sro23|Sro23]] ([[User talk:Sro23|talk]]) 19:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
::I rest my case. Obvious sockpuppet. [[User:Sro23|Sro23]] ([[User talk:Sro23|talk]]) 19:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
:::No, I stated my version of events which you asked for. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 19:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:06, 9 August 2020

LadyiTy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi LadyiTy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LadyiTy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I haven’t been abusing multiple accounts and have unfairly been blocked. I don’t think I have had a terrible experience on here and would like to continue to grow should I be unblocked.LadyiTy (talk)

Decline reason:

If you haven't used other accounts, you will need to give an explanation as to why others might think that you are. 331dot (talk) 18:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

LadyiTy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Not been abusing multiple accounts, this account is my only account and I don’t know as to why I’ve been accused of having multiple accounts. LadyiTy (talk) 18:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Not been abusing multiple accounts, this account is my only account and I don’t know as to why I’ve been accused of having multiple accounts. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 18:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Not been abusing multiple accounts, this account is my only account and I don’t know as to why I’ve been accused of having multiple accounts. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 18:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Not been abusing multiple accounts, this account is my only account and I don’t know as to why I’ve been accused of having multiple accounts. [[User:LadyiTy|LadyiTy]] ([[User talk:LadyiTy#top|talk]]) 18:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Note the restoring of sock edits to Tulisa: [1] [2] [3] and genre warring on other pages as well. Obvious MariaJaydHicky sock. Sro23 (talk) 18:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sro23 I've been looking into her edits, she's a vandalism only account, whereas I added sources and looking through the Tulisa article the other accounts you've blocked were adding correct sourced and reliable information. LadyiTy (talk) 18:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I rest my case. Obvious sockpuppet. Sro23 (talk) 19:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, I stated my version of events which you asked for. LadyiTy (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]