User talk:AEku482: Difference between revisions
General note: Adding original research, including unpublished syntheses of sources on Kartavirya Arjuna. (TW) |
→Warrior class or level of [[Bhishma]]: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]]. We appreciate [[Special:Contributions/AEku482|your contributions]], but in one of your recent edits to [[:Kartavirya Arjuna]], it appears that you have added [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]], which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position|combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say]]. Please be prepared to cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the [[Help:Introduction to referencing|tutorial on citing sources]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-nor1 --> [[User:Fire star on heat|Fire star on heat]] ([[User talk:Fire star on heat|talk]]) 13:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]]. We appreciate [[Special:Contributions/AEku482|your contributions]], but in one of your recent edits to [[:Kartavirya Arjuna]], it appears that you have added [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]], which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position|combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say]]. Please be prepared to cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the [[Help:Introduction to referencing|tutorial on citing sources]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-nor1 --> [[User:Fire star on heat|Fire star on heat]] ([[User talk:Fire star on heat|talk]]) 13:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Warrior class or level of [[Bhishma]] == |
|||
You have shown lot of interest on character [[Bhishma]]. From your edits both in articles and on talk pages, it is clear that you are fan of [[Bhishma]]. It's not wrong and not a problem but the way you are editing is not right way. Different editors have different favourites but they shouldn't edit in a wrong manner and change original content. This is purely termed as vandalism and regarded as disruptive editing. |
|||
However Bhishma is not Atimaharathi as per your claim but he is Maharathi and equal to 4 Maharathis. Go through this to have a better understanding [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/972154788] and please understand reality. I noticed that you raised this discussion already. So please don't raise same discussion again and again. Go through above mentioned link thoroughly and understand. I hope you won't repeat this next time again. Also please be careful in editing. Persistent vandalism might lead to loss of editing privileges. Thank you and have a nice day. [[User:Fire star on heat|Fire star on heat]] ([[User talk:Fire star on heat|talk]]) 13:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:58, 10 August 2020
Hello. I reverted your latest edits in article Hindu mythological wars. Your points are incorrect. Parashurama was not Atimaharathi. He killed 21 Khsatriyas individually but not in combined. Parashurama was equal to 4 maharathis. Hence Bhishma was equal to 4 Maharathis. Coming to Ashwatthama. Angry Ashwatthama becomes a destroyer like Shiva but not equal to his potential. Hence Ashwatthama used Narayanastra and slayed 1 Akshauni pandava army. Arjuna slayed 3 crore demons in a single shot. Arjuna alone defeated all Kuru warriors and 4 Akshauni army in Virat yudh. Hence he was named Atimaharathi but not clear whether he is equal to 1 Atimaharathi or more than that. I hope you are clear. Fire star on heat (talk) 01:59, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. Refer to above content. Don't add unsourced content as you did in articles Arjuna and Hindu mythological wars. If you have anything, please mention in talk page. Don't edit without citations. Thank you Fire star on heat (talk) 03:02, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
Hello, I'm Hillelfrei. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bhishma seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hillelfrei talk 20:59, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bhishma. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. xRENEGADEx 21:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by XRENEGADEx (talk • contribs)
June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Abhimanyu, you may be blocked from editing. SuperGoose007 (Honk!) 14:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Disruptive editing July 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing as you did it in article Hindu mythological wars. If you continue to edit in such a manner which oppose the real content, you may be blocked from editing. Fire star on heat (talk) 17:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kurukshetra war. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Template:Z187 Fire star on heat (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
Hello, I'm Fire star on heat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Astra (weapon), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fire star on heat (talk) 01:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kartavirya Arjuna, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Fire star on heat (talk) 13:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Warrior class or level of Bhishma
You have shown lot of interest on character Bhishma. From your edits both in articles and on talk pages, it is clear that you are fan of Bhishma. It's not wrong and not a problem but the way you are editing is not right way. Different editors have different favourites but they shouldn't edit in a wrong manner and change original content. This is purely termed as vandalism and regarded as disruptive editing. However Bhishma is not Atimaharathi as per your claim but he is Maharathi and equal to 4 Maharathis. Go through this to have a better understanding [1] and please understand reality. I noticed that you raised this discussion already. So please don't raise same discussion again and again. Go through above mentioned link thoroughly and understand. I hope you won't repeat this next time again. Also please be careful in editing. Persistent vandalism might lead to loss of editing privileges. Thank you and have a nice day. Fire star on heat (talk) 13:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)