Jump to content

User talk:TheBirdsShedTears: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 355: Line 355:


I have already addressed the issue, but you don't understand what i said. [[User:TheBirdsShedTears|TheBirdsShedTears]] ([[User talk:TheBirdsShedTears#top|talk]]) 17:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
I have already addressed the issue, but you don't understand what i said. [[User:TheBirdsShedTears|TheBirdsShedTears]] ([[User talk:TheBirdsShedTears#top|talk]]) 17:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

:How would I understand until you explain to me what's on your mind? I am not so experienced as you're. You still have not answered to my questions let alone addressed it. Why would I ask someone else to take it off. why can't you? You have not stated your reasons with an evidence on the talk page while adding the tag.[[User:Sayeda konain|Sayeda konain]] ([[User talk:Sayeda konain|talk]]) 18:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:01, 15 August 2020


Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Doe No. 24 has been accepted

John Doe No. 24, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sam-2727 (talk) 17:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TheBirdsShedTears

Thank you for creating Charar-e-Sharief shrine.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TheBirdsShedTears

Thank you for creating Tafazzul Siddiqui.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
Thank you for creating great articles covering the culture of India and Pakistan! Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:49, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TheBirdsShedTears

Thank you for creating Shahr Ashob.

User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work. It would be better if you could provide page(s) number for cited Google books.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Gazal world}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Gazal world (talk) 18:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TheBirdsShedTears

Thank you for creating Rekhta Foundation.

User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Gazal world}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Gazal world (talk) 08:43, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TheBirdsShedTears

Thank you for creating Brian B. Brown.

User:Eddie891, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work! Please make sure every paragraph has a citation. I couldn't verify in the given source that he was made director in June 2018, but the rest of the article seems good.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Eddie891}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Eddie891 Talk Work 00:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddie891:, i have corrected mistakes in the said article, improved lead and rearranged the references to make the information more accessible for verification. In June 2018 can be found HERE at the bottom of the page (i.e) in the last line. Thank you for pointing this out. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shahid ur Rehman.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shahid ur Rehman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 01:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freedom of the Press in Pakistan has been accepted

Freedom of the Press in Pakistan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Amkgp 💬 18:52, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Atta Mohammad Bhambhro

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Atta Mohammad Bhambhro. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Atta Muhammad Bhanbhro. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Atta Muhammad Bhanbhro. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 14:26, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Zaitoon Bano.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Zaitoon Bano.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Hi I’m just reviewing Disappearance of Marjorie West. Thanks for creating such a well-sourced article, and happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 04:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Poets from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

A tag has been placed on Category:Poets from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting help

Hi greetings,

I have been looking for update and expansion support for 2 following articles in draft namespace

and

Please do have a look at the article, do update, expand, correct inaccuracies, suggest and discuss better article titles

Looking forward to your kind support.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 07:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Report on Your Review for Latest Edit on Sparx* Animation Studios

Hello TheBirdsShedTears,

About this thread:

Allow me to verify my previous edit which was undone by you. Please find the citation about Sparx* Animation Studios was closed and rebranded into Sparx* - a Virtuos Studio here: https://www.sparx.com/en/About-us. We are planning to create a separate page for our new brand to avoid misunderstanding.

About who I am, please refer to my LinkedIn profile here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ngphungductoan/ I'm currently working for Sparx* - a Virtuos Studio.

Please refer to these references and hope you will approve my edit. Thank you.

Toan.

Ngphungductoan (talk) 11:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ngphungductoan, thank you for pointing this out. There are two problems with your edits you made on the article in question. 1. self-published works are generally considered as unreliable source. 2. Any editor who fails to disclose their paid editing or have direct or indirect affiliation with the topic are subject to conflict of interest. Please have a look at how to disclose a "conflict of interest and WP:PAID for more details. You need to refere more experienced editors or discus the issue on the article's talk page. Thank you. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ghulam Haider (composer)

@TheBirdsShedTears: ...Hi, hope you didn't assume that I wasn't aware of Wikipedia guidelines about using titles like 'Master' or 'Ustad', after so many years of my editing on Wikipedia? I won't revert you back. Besides my thinking is that it's not very productive or positive use of our time (all of us editors) to be reverting each other's work without first discussing it. Just a wish or thought on my part, that you could've first tried to ask me a question on my Talk page as to why I chose to make an EXCEPTION in Ghulam Haider's case? The title used to be 'Ghulam Haider (composer)' in the past, I'm sure both of us are well aware of that! Also I'm sure you saw under the article's 'View history' tab that it was a brief and short article some years ago before I did a lot of research and looking to do a major expansion on it. So why did I choose to make an exception in this case? It was due to his well-deserved reputation as a true trailblazer and a pioneer that brought a historical change in music industry of British India after the 'Silent movies era', recognized by music critics and music historians all over British India, then India and later Pakistan. We are certainly not talking about a run-of-the-mill music composer here. Mainly I did it with masses of people from the Indian subcontinent in mind...that when they use any search engine or even Wikipedia serarch box, what name will come to their mind? Master Ghulam Haider or Ghulam Haider....especially for many generations now, masses of people and almost all news media have been calling him Master Ghulam Haider to DISTINGUISH him from millions of Ghulam Haiders walking around today or in the past. In addition, I saw Wikipedia showing some flexibility in rare cases like his. Wikipedia does not have a harsh and rigid policy in rare cases like this, as I understand it. Best Regards Ngrewal1 (talk) 15:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ngrewal1I have already mentioned in my edit summary "you're welcome to add corresponding honorific to the infobox". Search engines are smart enough to show the same page if we google the subject in question. I first tried to rename the page back to its original title, but as you might be aware that standard editors "with no page move" rights can't rename page(s) if the title already existed. Therefore, i reverted your edit to bypass the error. Secondly, newspapers are free to write anything. They are not limited to neutrality. At least, we are humans here. Thank you and happy editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@TheBirdsShedTears: What do you mean by "we are human here" on Wikipedia? I'm sure you don't mean the journalists in Pakistan or anywhere else in the world that write for newspapers are not human? I think it's best that I try my best to take your first revert in good humor and I already said I won't revert you back this time. I am not convinced though, knowing what I know about Wikipedia and even consulting with others on Wikipedia, that you had no other option available to you but to do a revert. Please try to make a good faith effort to discuss things before reverting me next time especially when I have never reverted you. In fact, I thought I was following up on some of your edits on articles and tried to do whatever I could to add related templates to some of them just to further improve them. Let's move on and forget about it? Best Regards Ngrewal1 (talk) 03:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ngrewal1, I think you have an underlying misunderstanding about my edit and reply to your previous comment. I never meant that newspaper articles are written by "bots". What i mean is that if newspapers use honorific for a subject, "we should not use them in article's title, "at least we're humans here who are able to distinguish the subject with a newspaper article", and also if you don't agree with my assessment, please feel free to undo my edit. Thank you and happy editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 03:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
TheBirdsShedTears Now that you have further explained it. I agree with you and I sincerely wish you the best here on Wikipedia. Ngrewal1 (talk) 14:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Writers from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

A tag has been placed on Category:Writers from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 04:38, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi TheBirdsShedTears, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 21:29, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A pleasant surprise

I was using Wikipedia search box today as a routine, the name Feroz Nizami popped up. So I checked it and I was pleasantly surprised to see that you had created the article recently. I was getting ready myself to create it soon, but you beat me to it !!! Thank you so much Ngrewal1 (talk) 21:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A query regarding creating a page.

Hii, I created a draft for a page few days ago but it hasn't been approved yet. So I want to ask how many days does it take for a page to be approved. Thanks Ariabellzz (talk) 09:42, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ariabellzz, your draft has not been submitted for review. To submit your draft, please add {{subst:submit | Ariabellzz}} at the top of your draft. It may take upto 3 to 6 months or less. For any help, please visit Help desk for future references. Thanks TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:16, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Before you submit your draft, please provide reliable sources. See WP:VERIFY, WP:RELIABILITY, and WP:NOTE. Also see other articles to check how editors use inline citations. Thanks TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I think it worked now. Ariabellzz (talk) 12:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I have removed the speedy tag at Draft:James Horvath (pastor). I do not think it qualifies as misuse as webhost. It is a valid, if not very good, attempt at creating a bio article although notability may not (yet) be established. As such, it is not outside Wikipedia's remit... webhost would more likely refer to article like auto-bio type content in the user page, or more promotional content. I will offer you a belated welcome to AfC; you will see many drafts of a similar standard to this one which are good faith attempts at article creation by relatively new users. If you think they are not suitable for mainspace then please just decline them in the normal way. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 18:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eagleash I apologize, i didn't read the whole draft. The draft in question is significantly notable. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request to create a new article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yash_Dudhani My own first article about a activist of Maharashtra i am newly tried on truth information help Technoto (talk) 06:00, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Technoto Please post your request at Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By nationality#India. Before you do so, make sure to include reliable sources and also visit notability criteri project page for future references. Thanks TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Caption1
    Caption1
  • Caption2
    Caption2

Regarding page shiwani chakraborty

Can you please tell the references from you tube can be added or not ....Or if they can be added then how they can be added to the article? Can you please help regarding this Khusin26 (talk) 05:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khusin26, Please get instant help at AfC help desk or visit Teahouse.

Note: If you have conflict of interest with the subjec, please be aware to disclose it first on your user page. Thank you and happy editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the speedy reply. Khusin26 (talk) 05:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello, you moved a page I had edited to the draft. The page is Ganda (music producer). I checked the view history and you stated some reasons for that. I'm new to Wikipedia so I don't know much but as you are an experienced editor, would you mind expanding that article too if you can and I'll do too in the meantime. Your help would be really appreciated. marrymezendaya (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate usernames

First of all, thanks for keeping an eye out for inappropriate usernames and reporting them; however, some of your recent actions have not been exactly accurate: for instance, this username did not appear to be a blatant violation and the user had not even started to edit; this was not a blatant violation either, and neither was this. Please try to be more careful in the future. Salvio 08:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiographical Artist page

Hi,

Found a note on my page I think from yourself querying my article on myself. What is the issue with this, I think its non biased and accurate as a beginning page for myself as an Artist, I wouldn't otherwise know who to get to publish it.

Thanks Nzysh (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nzysh, Hi, i didn't said that your draft contains bias. What i want to say is that Wikipedia do not allow editors writing an autobiography. To be more specific, autobiography deals with the conflict of interest which according to Wikipedia is against terms of use. For further details, information or help related to article creation, please visit Teahouse or AfC help desk. Thank you and happy editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Joseph Mapes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on James Joseph Mapes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 13:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae I didn't create this page, but moved it into draftspace via script. It was an unsourced article created by another user. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page (Bahador Zamani) has been edited

Hello dear ´´TheBirdsShedTears´´

I edited the ( Bahador Zamani) page again and tried to improve it. Would you please check the page again remove the template ? I would be grateful if you help me to further improve this page.--Rashidhosseini3 (talk) 17:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftifications

Hi, just a small note regarding this, I would recommend reserving draftifications for articles by inexperienced users. WP:DRAFTIFY recommends this as well. Secondly, would recommend giving people at least half an hour to finish working on their article before draftifying or tagging. There is no rush, people often start small and add content over the next hour. See you around, – Thjarkur (talk) 17:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Draftifications

Hello TheBirdsShedTears, you moved the page I was editing "Bluebird Theatre Company" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bluebird_Theatre_Company) to drafts. I have since then improved a great majority of the references and citations and added a fair deal of content, as I was going to, starting small and adding content over a short time. Is it possible to explain the nature of this page patrolling? I am somewhat new to Wikipedia.. but was sure I had plentiful information to begin a published page with. Regardless, if there is a way to revoke your drafting of my page, that would be ideal. If you refer to the page you will see to all the edits and additions I have made, granting legibility of verification and publishing of the Company wiki. Regards. M0711K (talk) 13:09, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

M0711K the page was unsourced and written like an advertisement. Once the draft is improved, feel free to submit this for AfC review. See WP:V and WP:N for future reference. Thank you and happy editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
TheBirdsShedTears The page was referenced to the official non-profit company website, and as a user previously said, it would be beneficial to leave a new page some time to develop after publishing. As they mentioned, many start small and continue their way throughout the day, on a published page in the mainspace. Essentially, what has happened, is that I have added all the informative and well-cited information as planned, now with unexpected hurdles and difficulties through wait-time for approval due to uncalled-for page patrolling.. It is now up for review, unnecessarily and unfortunately. Thank you for your service. M0711K (talk) 13:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
M0711K (see [1] ) Instagram, YouTube, Facebook and company's own official website is not reliable. It must be supported by independent reliable sources. Please see user-generated contents. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:43, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
TheBirdsShedTears If you were to refer to the more veritable citations made, other than the basic non-profit company's social media, which includes Performance Zone Inc (dba The Field)-- verifying the company as a not-for-profit, tax-exempt, 501(c)(3) organization, in other words, an independent reliable source, as well as another renowned theater company, Atlantic (with less information and citations than the one I'm editing for!), and a separate, third-party production company -- I don't know how much more independent and reliable you can get :) Besides, the article was written from a neutral stance, purely informational. A peculiar debate, trying to legitimize a 501(c)(3) organization on Wiki. M0711K (talk) 14:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Didn't realize I cut that ref. Completely unintentional! AleatoryPonderings (talk) 12:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AleatoryPonderings No worries! It happens sometimes. Cheers TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Evaly

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Evaly, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS 💬 06:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GSS wrong notification :D TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle act crazy sometimes :)) Please feel free to remove it. GSS 💬 06:56, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, it happens sometimes. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anton Jivaev

I declined your speedy nomination of Anton Jivaev because I found the article contained a credible claim of notability. However, I'm not sure the claim holds true. I think an AfD nomination would be in order... Thanks for your volunteer work! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:55, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for more information

What are the specific requirements of TheBirdShedTears for insisting that Wikipedia articles be submitted for review?

Suslindisambiguator, I am not insisting. I have provided the reason in my edit summary. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Suslindisambiguator, if you disagree with my assessment, you may submit your draft for AfC review. If the current sources are good enough, your draft will be published. I have also created a draft Draft:Donald Nash some time ago, but i didn't move this into mainspace as i want it be reviewed through AfC. I am not sure it's notability. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KissFlow

Hi TheBirdsShedTears, I saw you again added the template on the page. I've asked you many times to point to even one article where I have added promotional info but you never responded. As stated previously I am not engaged in promotional editing, I have barely edited few articles and I think it would be unfair for you to judge anyone just seeing few edits. I have not even added any promotional info on any of the articles I edited. you can go back and check the entire history. The above page was my first article on Wikipedia. I would request you to remove the tag or advise what I could do to the page to remove it. Do you still think it has promotional content that you keep adding tags?Sayeda konain (talk) 15:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sayeda konain, Promotional editing is not only limited to "promotional wording", but maintenance tag describes the possible issues, including WP:COI. If you think i did wrong, please ask any experienced user to resolve this issue. You may also seek help from Teahouse. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't change your statement. Your whole arguement was on me creating articles about non notable subjects and adding only promotional info to other pages. You placed the tag on the above page stating User was engaged in promotional editing only and when I asked you for a clarification You stated I had only created pages for non notable companies and used promotional tone which turned out to be completely false because I've only created redirect pages and only two and none of them got deleted due to notability issues (check for yourself) and I've never seen redirects deleted for notability issues either. As for adding promotional, I asked you many times to show even one example of me using promotional tone on other pages but you stopped responding. The whole conversation is there on my talk page. If you can't prove your claims then you should not stop me from removing the tag. Sayeda konain (talk) 17:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sayeda konain, As i earlier asked, if you are not comfortable with UPE template placed on KissFlow article, please address the issue on the article's talk page. Other editors may resolve this issue. But do not remove this by yourself. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have already addressed the issue, but you don't understand what i said. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How would I understand until you explain to me what's on your mind? I am not so experienced as you're. You still have not answered to my questions let alone addressed it. Why would I ask someone else to take it off. why can't you? You have not stated your reasons with an evidence on the talk page while adding the tag.Sayeda konain (talk) 18:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheBirdsShedTears&oldid=973156098"