Jump to content

Bhonsle (clan): Difference between revisions

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Reverting unexplained removals
→Origin: Required
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 31: Line 31:
At the time of coronation of Shivaji, Bhonsles claimed their origin from [[Suryavansha|Suryavanshi]] [[Sisodia]] Rajput.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uQFuAAAAMAAJ|title=The Quarterly Journal of the Mythic Society (Bangalore).|year=1975|page=18}}</ref><ref name="S1998">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1lZuAAAAMAAJ|title=India's communities|author=Singh K S|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=1998|isbn=978-0-19-563354-2|page=2211}}</ref><ref name="(India)1967">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EXtEAQAAIAAJ|title=Maharashtra State Gazetteers: Maratha period|author=Maharashtra (India)|publisher=Directorate of Government Printing, Stationary and Publications, Maharashtra State|year=1967|page=147}}</ref> Allison Busch, Professor at the [[University of Columbia]] states that Shivaji was not a [[Kshatriya]] as required and hence had to postpone the coronation until 1674 and hired Gaga Bhatt to trace his ancestry back to the Sisodias. While the preparations for the coronations were in process, Bhushan, a poet, wrote a poem about this genealogy claimed by Bhatt in "Shivrajbhushan". Using this example, Busch shows how even poetry was an "important instrument of statecraft" at the time.<ref name="Allison2011">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Dl0sbzehWvAC&pg=PA191|title=Poetry of Kings: The Classical Hindi Literature of Mughal India|last=Busch|first=Allison|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2011|isbn=978-0-19-976592-8|pages=190, 191|quote=(190,191)Another concern was an ancestry problem that threatened to derail his coronation. Shivaji was not a Kshatriya as required by classical political thought. This proved not to be insuperable, however. Shivaji postponed the coronation until 1674 and hired Gaga Bhatt, a celebrated pandit, who was able to trace the Maratha King's ancestry back to the Sisodiayas of Mewar...}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.columbia.edu/cu/mesaas/faculty/directory/busch.html|title=MESAAS &#124; Allison Busch|website=columbia.edu|accessdate=6 June 2019}}</ref>
At the time of coronation of Shivaji, Bhonsles claimed their origin from [[Suryavansha|Suryavanshi]] [[Sisodia]] Rajput.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uQFuAAAAMAAJ|title=The Quarterly Journal of the Mythic Society (Bangalore).|year=1975|page=18}}</ref><ref name="S1998">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1lZuAAAAMAAJ|title=India's communities|author=Singh K S|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=1998|isbn=978-0-19-563354-2|page=2211}}</ref><ref name="(India)1967">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EXtEAQAAIAAJ|title=Maharashtra State Gazetteers: Maratha period|author=Maharashtra (India)|publisher=Directorate of Government Printing, Stationary and Publications, Maharashtra State|year=1967|page=147}}</ref> Allison Busch, Professor at the [[University of Columbia]] states that Shivaji was not a [[Kshatriya]] as required and hence had to postpone the coronation until 1674 and hired Gaga Bhatt to trace his ancestry back to the Sisodias. While the preparations for the coronations were in process, Bhushan, a poet, wrote a poem about this genealogy claimed by Bhatt in "Shivrajbhushan". Using this example, Busch shows how even poetry was an "important instrument of statecraft" at the time.<ref name="Allison2011">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Dl0sbzehWvAC&pg=PA191|title=Poetry of Kings: The Classical Hindi Literature of Mughal India|last=Busch|first=Allison|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2011|isbn=978-0-19-976592-8|pages=190, 191|quote=(190,191)Another concern was an ancestry problem that threatened to derail his coronation. Shivaji was not a Kshatriya as required by classical political thought. This proved not to be insuperable, however. Shivaji postponed the coronation until 1674 and hired Gaga Bhatt, a celebrated pandit, who was able to trace the Maratha King's ancestry back to the Sisodiayas of Mewar...}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.columbia.edu/cu/mesaas/faculty/directory/busch.html|title=MESAAS &#124; Allison Busch|website=columbia.edu|accessdate=6 June 2019}}</ref>


Scholars suggest that [[Pandit Gaga Bhatt]] was secured in charge of authoritatively declaring him a Kshatriya as Bhonsales being Marathas did not belong to Kshatriya nor any other upper caste but were mere tillers of soil as Shivaji's great-grandfather was remembered to have been. Bhatt was made compliant, and he accepted the Bhonsle pedigree as fabricated by the clever secretary Balaji Avji, and declared that Rajah was a Kshatriya, descended from the Maharanas of Udaipur. Bhatt was rewarded for the bogus genealogy with a huge fee.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WYFrgILWbIgC&lpg=PP1&dq=Jadunath%20sarkar%20shivaji%20coronation&pg=PA158#v=onepage|title=Shivaji and His Times|last=Sarkar|first=Jadunath|date=1992|publisher=Orient Longman|isbn=9788125013471|language=en}}</ref><ref name="Keay2011">{{cite book|author=John Keay|title=India: A History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0IquM4BrJ4YC&pg=PT565|date=12 April 2011|publisher=Open Road + Grove/Atlantic|isbn=978-0-8021-9550-0|pages=565|quote=marathas not being accounted as of kshatriya status, a bogus genealogy had to be fabricated}}</ref> The Brahman acknowledgement of Kshatriyahood is therefore taken as political. The passage from the Dutch records suggest the plausibility of this argument.<ref name="Bakshi1998">{{cite book|author=Shiri Ram Bakshi|title=Sharad Pawar, the Maratha legacy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iP433CnEW_gC&pg=PA25|year=1998|publisher=APH Publishing|isbn=978-81-7648-007-9|page=25}}</ref> The report of Shivaji's coronation in the contemporary [[Dutch East India Company]] archives indicates that Shivaji's claim was contested twice at the ceremony itself. Firstly the Brahmins did not want to grant him the status of Kshatriya and then they refused him the recitation of the Vedas, indicating Shivaji was admitted to the fold of the higher [[Varna (Hinduism)|varnas]] as far as the sign of the sacred thread was concerned, but restricted in their use of the concomitant ritual rights including the recitation of the Vedas.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yTTJa0usl80C|title=Xenophobia in Seventeenth-century India|last=Kruijtzer|first=Gijs|date=2009|publisher=Leiden University Press|isbn=9789087280680|pages=143|language=en}}</ref>
Scholars suggest that [[Pandit Gaga Bhatt]] was secured in charge of authoritatively declaring him a Kshatriya as Bhonsales, being Marathas did not belong to Kshatriya nor any other upper caste but were mere tillers of soil as Shivaji's great-grandfather was remembered to have been. Bhatt was made compliant, and he accepted the Bhonsle pedigree as fabricated by the clever secretary Balaji Avji, and declared that Rajah was a Kshatriya, descended from the Maharanas of Udaipur. Bhatt was rewarded for the bogus genealogy with a huge fee.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WYFrgILWbIgC&lpg=PP1&dq=Jadunath%20sarkar%20shivaji%20coronation&pg=PA158#v=onepage|title=Shivaji and His Times|last=Sarkar|first=Jadunath|date=1992|publisher=Orient Longman|isbn=9788125013471|language=en}}</ref><ref name="Keay2011">{{cite book|author=John Keay|title=India: A History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0IquM4BrJ4YC&pg=PT565|date=12 April 2011|publisher=Open Road + Grove/Atlantic|isbn=978-0-8021-9550-0|pages=565|quote=marathas not being accounted as of kshatriya status, a bogus genealogy had to be fabricated}}</ref> The Brahman acknowledgement of Kshatriyahood is therefore taken as political. The passage from the Dutch records suggest the plausibility of this argument.<ref name="Bakshi1998">{{cite book|author=Shiri Ram Bakshi|title=Sharad Pawar, the Maratha legacy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iP433CnEW_gC&pg=PA25|year=1998|publisher=APH Publishing|isbn=978-81-7648-007-9|page=25}}</ref> The report of Shivaji's coronation in the contemporary [[Dutch East India Company]] archives indicates that Shivaji's claim was contested twice at the ceremony itself. Firstly the Brahmins did not want to grant him the status of Kshatriya and then they refused him the recitation of the Vedas, indicating Shivaji was admitted to the fold of the higher [[Varna (Hinduism)|varnas]] as far as the sign of the sacred thread was concerned, but restricted in their use of the concomitant ritual rights including the recitation of the Vedas.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yTTJa0usl80C|title=Xenophobia in Seventeenth-century India|last=Kruijtzer|first=Gijs|date=2009|publisher=Leiden University Press|isbn=9789087280680|pages=143|language=en}}</ref>


Historians such as Surendra Nath Sen and [[Vishwanath Kashinath Rajwade|V. K. Rajwade]] reject the Sisodia origin by citing the temple inscription of Math, dated to 1397 and holds the view that the genealogy was forged by Shivaji's men.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/sivachhatrapatib00krshrich|title=Siva Chhatrapati : being a translation of Sabhasad Bakhar with extracts from Chitnis and Sivadigvijya, with notes|last1=Krshnaji Ananta Sabhasada|last2=Sen|first2=Surendra Nath|date=1920|publisher=Calcutta : University of Calcutta|others=University of California Libraries|pages=260, 261}}</ref> According to [[Ramchandra Chintaman Dhere|R. C. Dhere]], Bhonsles are descendants of the founder of Shikhar, Balip. He argues that the name Bhonsle is linguistically descended from ''Hoysala''. There is a branch of Bhonsle clan extant in Maharashtra that goes by the name ''Śirsāṭ Bhosale'' and Balip's full name, from inscriptional sources cited by Dhere, was 'Baliyeppā Gopati Śirsāṭ'.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=S8EoAAAAYAAJ|title=Traditions in Motion: Religion and Society in History|last1=Varma|first1=Supriya|last2=Saberwal|first2=Satish|date=2005|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780195669152|pages=262, 265|language=en}}</ref> Some [[Mudhol State|Mudhol]] [[firman]]s in the possession of the Rajah of Mudhol claim the descent of the Ghorpades under the Adil Shahs and the Bhonsles, from the Sisodia Rajputs of Udaipur. However historians consider these firmans spurious as these are the copies (not originals), written by a scholar of Bijapur dated to c.1709, much after the coronation of Shivaji.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yhxuAAAAMAAJ&q=mudhol+sisodia&dq=mudhol+sisodia|title=Indica|date=1983|publisher=Heras Institute of Indian History and Culture, St. Xavier's College.|pages=89|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zG1DAAAAYAAJ&q=new+history+of+marathas&dq=new+history+of+marathas|title=New History of the Marathas: Shivaji and his line (1600-1707)|last=Sardesai|first=Govind Sakharam|date=1957|publisher=Phoenix Publications|pages=46|language=en}}</ref> André Wink, a professor of History at [[University of Wisconsin–Madison]], states that the Sisodia genealogical claim is destined to remain disputed forever.<ref name=":2" />
Historians such as Surendra Nath Sen and [[Vishwanath Kashinath Rajwade|V. K. Rajwade]] reject the Sisodia origin by citing the temple inscription of Math, dated to 1397 and holds the view that the genealogy was forged by Shivaji's men.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/sivachhatrapatib00krshrich|title=Siva Chhatrapati : being a translation of Sabhasad Bakhar with extracts from Chitnis and Sivadigvijya, with notes|last1=Krshnaji Ananta Sabhasada|last2=Sen|first2=Surendra Nath|date=1920|publisher=Calcutta : University of Calcutta|others=University of California Libraries|pages=260, 261}}</ref> According to [[Ramchandra Chintaman Dhere|R. C. Dhere]], Bhonsles are descendants of the founder of Shikhar, Balip. He argues that the name Bhonsle is linguistically descended from ''Hoysala''. There is a branch of Bhonsle clan extant in Maharashtra that goes by the name ''Śirsāṭ Bhosale'' and Balip's full name, from inscriptional sources cited by Dhere, was 'Baliyeppā Gopati Śirsāṭ'.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=S8EoAAAAYAAJ|title=Traditions in Motion: Religion and Society in History|last1=Varma|first1=Supriya|last2=Saberwal|first2=Satish|date=2005|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780195669152|pages=262, 265|language=en}}</ref> Some [[Mudhol State|Mudhol]] [[firman]]s in the possession of the Rajah of Mudhol claim the descent of the Ghorpades under the Adil Shahs and the Bhonsles, from the Sisodia Rajputs of Udaipur. However historians consider these firmans spurious as these are the copies (not originals), written by a scholar of Bijapur dated to c.1709, much after the coronation of Shivaji.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yhxuAAAAMAAJ&q=mudhol+sisodia&dq=mudhol+sisodia|title=Indica|date=1983|publisher=Heras Institute of Indian History and Culture, St. Xavier's College.|pages=89|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zG1DAAAAYAAJ&q=new+history+of+marathas&dq=new+history+of+marathas|title=New History of the Marathas: Shivaji and his line (1600-1707)|last=Sardesai|first=Govind Sakharam|date=1957|publisher=Phoenix Publications|pages=46|language=en}}</ref> André Wink, a professor of History at [[University of Wisconsin–Madison]], states that the Sisodia genealogical claim is destined to remain disputed forever.<ref name=":2" />

Revision as of 02:52, 18 August 2020

This article is about the clan. For the film, see Bhonsle (film). For other uses, see Bhonsle (clan) (disambiguation).
"Bhosle" and "Bhosale" redirect here. For other uses, see Bhosle (disambiguation) and Bhosale (disambiguation).

Bhonsle
Maratha clan
EthnicityIndian
LocationMaharashtra, Tamil Nadu
LanguageMarathi
ReligionHinduism

The Bhonsle (or Bhonsale, Bhosale, Bhosle)[1] are a prominent group within the Maratha clan system. Traditionally a warrior clan,[2][3] they have claimed a descent from Shivaji Maharaj, the founder of the Maratha Empire, although this is disputed.

Akkalkot State,[4] Sawantwadi State[5] and Barshi[6] were amongst the prominent states ruled by the Bhonsles.

Origin

The Bhonsles originated among the populations of the Deccani tiller-plainsmen who were known by the names Kunbi and Maratha.[7]

At the time of coronation of Shivaji, Bhonsles claimed their origin from Suryavanshi Sisodia Rajput.[8][9][10] Allison Busch, Professor at the University of Columbia states that Shivaji was not a Kshatriya as required and hence had to postpone the coronation until 1674 and hired Gaga Bhatt to trace his ancestry back to the Sisodias. While the preparations for the coronations were in process, Bhushan, a poet, wrote a poem about this genealogy claimed by Bhatt in "Shivrajbhushan". Using this example, Busch shows how even poetry was an "important instrument of statecraft" at the time.[11][12]

Scholars suggest that Pandit Gaga Bhatt was secured in charge of authoritatively declaring him a Kshatriya as Bhonsales, being Marathas did not belong to Kshatriya nor any other upper caste but were mere tillers of soil as Shivaji's great-grandfather was remembered to have been. Bhatt was made compliant, and he accepted the Bhonsle pedigree as fabricated by the clever secretary Balaji Avji, and declared that Rajah was a Kshatriya, descended from the Maharanas of Udaipur. Bhatt was rewarded for the bogus genealogy with a huge fee.[13][14] The Brahman acknowledgement of Kshatriyahood is therefore taken as political. The passage from the Dutch records suggest the plausibility of this argument.[15] The report of Shivaji's coronation in the contemporary Dutch East India Company archives indicates that Shivaji's claim was contested twice at the ceremony itself. Firstly the Brahmins did not want to grant him the status of Kshatriya and then they refused him the recitation of the Vedas, indicating Shivaji was admitted to the fold of the higher varnas as far as the sign of the sacred thread was concerned, but restricted in their use of the concomitant ritual rights including the recitation of the Vedas.[16]

Historians such as Surendra Nath Sen and V. K. Rajwade reject the Sisodia origin by citing the temple inscription of Math, dated to 1397 and holds the view that the genealogy was forged by Shivaji's men.[17] According to R. C. Dhere, Bhonsles are descendants of the founder of Shikhar, Balip. He argues that the name Bhonsle is linguistically descended from Hoysala. There is a branch of Bhonsle clan extant in Maharashtra that goes by the name Śirsāṭ Bhosale and Balip's full name, from inscriptional sources cited by Dhere, was 'Baliyeppā Gopati Śirsāṭ'.[18] Some Mudhol firmans in the possession of the Rajah of Mudhol claim the descent of the Ghorpades under the Adil Shahs and the Bhonsles, from the Sisodia Rajputs of Udaipur. However historians consider these firmans spurious as these are the copies (not originals), written by a scholar of Bijapur dated to c.1709, much after the coronation of Shivaji.[19][20] André Wink, a professor of History at University of Wisconsin–Madison, states that the Sisodia genealogical claim is destined to remain disputed forever.[16]

Following historical evidence, Shivaji's claim to Rajput, and specifically Sisodia ancestry may be interpreted as being anything from tenuous at best, to inventive in a more extreme reading.[21]

See also

References

  1. ^ Kulkarni, Prashant P. (6 June 1990). "Coinage of the Bhonsla Rajas of Nagpur". Indian Coin Society.
  2. ^ History, Kenneth Pletcher Senior Editor, Geography and (15 August 2010). The History of India. The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc. ISBN 9781615301225. {{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Hoiberg, Dale; Ramchandani, Indu (6 June 2000). "Students' Britannica India: D to H (Dadra and Nagar Haveli to Hyena)". Encyclopaedia Britannica (India).
  4. ^ Kulkarni, Sumitra (1995). The Satara Raj, 1818-1848: A Study in History, Administration, and Culture. Mittal Publications. ISBN 9788170995814.
  5. ^ "Portuguese Studies Review". International Conference Group on Portugal. 6 June 2001.
  6. ^ "The Gazetteers Department". akola.nic.in.
  7. ^ Bayly, Susan (22 February 2001). Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age. Cambridge University Press. p. 57. ISBN 9780521798426.
  8. ^ The Quarterly Journal of the Mythic Society (Bangalore). 1975. p. 18.
  9. ^ Singh K S (1998). India's communities. Oxford University Press. p. 2211. ISBN 978-0-19-563354-2.
  10. ^ Maharashtra (India) (1967). Maharashtra State Gazetteers: Maratha period. Directorate of Government Printing, Stationary and Publications, Maharashtra State. p. 147.
  11. ^ Busch, Allison (2011). Poetry of Kings: The Classical Hindi Literature of Mughal India. Oxford University Press. pp. 190, 191. ISBN 978-0-19-976592-8. (190,191)Another concern was an ancestry problem that threatened to derail his coronation. Shivaji was not a Kshatriya as required by classical political thought. This proved not to be insuperable, however. Shivaji postponed the coronation until 1674 and hired Gaga Bhatt, a celebrated pandit, who was able to trace the Maratha King's ancestry back to the Sisodiayas of Mewar...
  12. ^ "MESAAS | Allison Busch". columbia.edu. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  13. ^ Sarkar, Jadunath (1992). Shivaji and His Times. Orient Longman. ISBN 9788125013471.
  14. ^ John Keay (12 April 2011). India: A History. Open Road + Grove/Atlantic. p. 565. ISBN 978-0-8021-9550-0. marathas not being accounted as of kshatriya status, a bogus genealogy had to be fabricated
  15. ^ Shiri Ram Bakshi (1998). Sharad Pawar, the Maratha legacy. APH Publishing. p. 25. ISBN 978-81-7648-007-9.
  16. ^ a b Kruijtzer, Gijs (2009). Xenophobia in Seventeenth-century India. Leiden University Press. p. 143. ISBN 9789087280680.
  17. ^ Krshnaji Ananta Sabhasada; Sen, Surendra Nath (1920). Siva Chhatrapati : being a translation of Sabhasad Bakhar with extracts from Chitnis and Sivadigvijya, with notes. University of California Libraries. Calcutta : University of Calcutta. pp. 260, 261.
  18. ^ Varma, Supriya; Saberwal, Satish (2005). Traditions in Motion: Religion and Society in History. Oxford University Press. pp. 262, 265. ISBN 9780195669152.
  19. ^ Indica. Heras Institute of Indian History and Culture, St. Xavier's College. 1983. p. 89.
  20. ^ Sardesai, Govind Sakharam (1957). New History of the Marathas: Shivaji and his line (1600-1707). Phoenix Publications. p. 46.
  21. ^ Varma, Supriya; Saberwal, Satish (2005). Traditions in Motion: Religion and Society in History. Oxford University Press. p. 250. ISBN 9780195669152.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Bhonsle_(clan)&oldid=973591515"