Helen Pluckrose: Difference between revisions
More information added |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<!-- Inline citations added to your article will automatically display here. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:REFB for instructions on how to add citations. --> |
<!-- Inline citations added to your article will automatically display here. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:REFB for instructions on how to add citations. --> |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
{{AFC submission|||ts=20200825225027|u=BorderTensions|ns=118}} |
|||
Revision as of 22:50, 25 August 2020
This article, Helen Pluckrose, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |
Helen Pluckrose is a British author, writer and academic. She is primarily known for her role in the 2017-18 'Grievance studies affair', a project Pluckrose conducted alongside James A. Lindsay and Peter Boghossian, that involved the formulation of bogus academic papers for submission to journals in order to test the veracity and intellectual rigour of academic journals specialising in gender and critical race theory.[1]
Career
Pluckrose has an academic background as a literature and history researcher, particularly focusing on "the ways in which mediavel women negotiated the Christian narrative".[2]
She is currently the editor-in-chief of the online webzine Areo.[3] She has used this platform to criticise what she sees as the self-censorship of women (albeit more broadly students and academics also) on university campuses, which she sees as often stemming from a disagreement about the use of intersectional feminism in academic literature.[4]
Grievance Studies Affair
Alongside James A. Lindsay and Peter Boghossian, Pluckrose was a key figure in the 2017-18 'grievance studies affair', an exposé that involved the submission of bogus academic papers to journals in cultural, gender, queer and race studies (among others).
Despite criticism of the expose as a "hoax" and "coordinated attack from the right", Pluckrose and her colleagues are self-described "left-leaning liberals".[5] They maintain that their intentions behind conducting the affair was to highlight two key problems in social sciences - the "low standards of pay-to-publish journals" and the "meaningless nonsense" that can be published in humanities journals, so long as then-popular ideas about gender and sexuality are espoused.[6]
References
- ^ https://www.vox.com/2018/10/15/17951492/grievance-studies-sokal-squared-hoax
- ^ https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/the-problem-with-grievance-studies/news-story/674aefae465e3b26b9690f2997510d33
- ^ https://www.chronicle.com/article/scholar-who-pulled-off-publishing-hoax-defends-it-papers-are-either-sound-or-they-arent/
- ^ https://areomagazine.com/2017/10/24/the-state-of-the-campus-and-womens-self-censorship/
- ^ https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/new-sokal-hoax/572212/
- ^ https://areomagazine.com/2017/05/21/sokal-affair-2-0-penis-envy-addressing-its-critics/
This article, Helen Pluckrose, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |