Talk:Dario Hunter: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:02, 29 August 2020

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 June 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dario Hunter article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Ohio Low‑importance

	Ohio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.OhioWikipedia:WikiProject OhioTemplate:WikiProject OhioOhio
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dario Hunter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Dario Hunter 2020 US Presidential Exploratory Comm. Announcement - Jan. 21, 2019 (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:21, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Dario Hunter 2020 US Presidential Exploratory Comm. Announcement - Jan. 21, 2019 (cropped).jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns re: Edits Made by Howie Hawkins Page Editors

An editor who also pursued the removal of sourced info on allegations raised by Hunter and other candidates from the Howie Hawkins 2020 presidential campaign page, has at the same time (i.e. within the same 24 hr period) been making Hawkins-centered and unsourced edits to this page that do not adhere to NPOV. Howie Hawkins is the former competitor to Hunter in both the Green Party and Oregon Progressive Party presidential primaries. The edits have since been modified to reflect Wikipedia standards.

I raise the concern here to alert editors to the potential for vandalism of the article. While I maintain the assumption of good faith (i.e. the editor may believe the edits are warranted), Wikipedia standards must still be observed and the cross edits - considering both content and context - are not a good look. Audentis (talk) 08:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're talking about me, it is common courtesy to tag me here. I've been editing Wikipedia for over 14 years so being described as a "Howie Hawkins Page Editor" is both highly reductionist and definitely not assuming good faith. Editors are free to make edits where they see fit.--User:Namiba 15:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editors are not free to make edits where they see fit. They are free to make edits that conform to Wikipedia policy. 179.53.72.255 (talk) 23:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you remove the sentence about Hunter winning the Oregon Progressive Party primary? There’s no justifiable Wiki policy reason for doing that. It was sourced and it is a fact. Trashing duly sourced facts about the subject (that happen to be positive) just smacks of plain old vandalism. 179.53.72.255 (talk) 23:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not remove it. I restored it in a second edit. You should look more closely before making wild accusations.--User:Namiba 15:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Namiba You’ve already made your allowed number of reverts. Audentis (talk) 06:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Party

The article repeatedly calls Hunter an independent candidate. So do sources like The Spectator, Ballot Access News among other sources. Hunter has the ballot label Progressive but there is no national Progressive Party that has nominated him. As such, Wikipedia should reflect the sources and not assert that he is the Progressive Party nominee.--User:Namiba 15:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article clearly indicates that Hunter initially ran as an independent. However, he has since decided to run as a Progressive Party candidate. This is just a fact. Candidates are entitled to run under any party they choose, editors don’t get to decide what is and isn’t a party or rebut the subject of a political article when they declare their party affiliation. That’s a insertion of an editor’s opinion and that is against Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Just stick to the facts and sourcing them. 179.53.72.255 (talk) 23:48, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Progressive Party. It's just a ballot label that he chose. If you can provide proof of a Progressive Party that nominated him, or even the existence of a unified Progressive Party that exists outside of Dario Hunter's ballot line, please present it here. I've provided multiple sources which demonstrate that the accurate description is independent with the Progressive ballot label. Please provide sources to counter these claims by independent, non-trivial sources.--User:Namiba 15:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:NamibaYour criteria is self-created and has no basis in Wikipedia policy. Sources have been provided that Hunter has chosen to run as a candidate for the Progressive Party. There’s no process of Wikipedia assessment of the viability of political parties in order to state the fact of a candidate’s affiliation. You’re entitled to believe the Progressive Party is not viable, doesn’t have a suitable nomination process, isn’t a unified national party - those are all OPINIONS you’re entitled to have. You’re not entitled to remove facts about Hunter’s stated affiliation as a Progressive Party candidate, as sourced to his own statement and the source provided in the article for his ballot line designation. You’re not entitled to insert your opinions into Wiki editing. Please stop removing facts from the article without valid Wikipedia reasons. You’ve made your allowed number of reverts. Audentis (talk) 06:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, here’s a link to the Federal Election Commission party committee profile for The Progressive Party of the United States: https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00755041/ Hunter is listed as the treasurer on filings. Audentis (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here the link to Hunter’s most recent statement of candidacy: https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/P00010124/1432455/ It states ‘PRU’ under party. That party abbreviation appears as the abbreviation for the Progressive Party of the US on its party committee filings (linked to above). Although the statement of candidacy before the most recent one said ‘independent,’ this one changes that status to Progressive. Audentis (talk) 07:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neither link you've provided above includes any mention of a Progressive Party. There are no sources showing he was nominated by said group or that said group even exists.--User:Namiba 13:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

”Neither link... includes any mention of a Progressive Party.” What are you talking about? The FEC party committee profile page (linked above) is entitled “The Progressive Party of the United States.” It says in bold letters at the top of the page “The Progressive Party of the United States.” And if you click ‘Filings’ on the left column, you can access a ‘Statement of Organization’ for the party committee of (you guessed it) ‘The Progressive Party of the United States.’
I get that you have your opinions and your feelings about this. But neither opinions nor feelings are facts. The party exists. And the sources in the page corroborate that he’s running for that party. Someone being so hellbent to remove those facts from the article is concerning, especially since this is about an election in progress. How do you force someone to be an ‘independent’ when they say they are not and their candidate filings say they are not? Just because you personally don’t take their party seriously? There’s no Wiki policy accommodation for those feelings on your part, just the facts. Audentis (talk) 14:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 :Here the link to Hunter’s most recent statement of candidacy: https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/P00010124/1432455/ It states ‘PRU’ under party. That party abbreviation appears as the abbreviation for the Progressive Party of the US on its party committee filings (linked to above). Although the statement of candidacy before the most recent one said ‘independent,’ this one changes that status to Progressive. [[User:Audentis|Audentis]] ([[User talk:Audentis|talk]]) 07:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 ::Neither link you've provided above includes any mention of a Progressive Party. There are no sources showing he was nominated by said group or that said group even exists.--[[User:Namiba]] 13:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
+:::<I>”Neither link... includes any mention of a Progressive Party.”</I> <b>What are you talking about?</b> The FEC party committee profile page (linked above) is entitled “The Progressive Party of the United States.” It says in bold letters at the top of the page “The Progressive Party of the United States.” And if you click ‘Filings’ on the left column, you can access a ‘Statement of Organization’ for the party committee of (you guessed it) ‘The Progressive Party of the United States.’ <br>I get that you have your opinions and your feelings about this. But neither opinions nor feelings are facts. The party exists. And the sources in the page corroborate that he’s running for that party. Someone being so hellbent to remove those facts from the article is concerning, especially since this is about an election in progress. How do you force someone to be an ‘independent’ when they say they are not and their candidate filings say they are not? Just because you personally don’t take their party seriously? There’s no Wiki policy accommodation for those feelings on your part, just the facts. [[User:Audentis|Audentis]] ([[User talk:Audentis|talk]]) 14:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)