Jump to content

KV60: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: 25°44′20.6″N 32°36′11.3″E / 25.739056°N 32.603139°E / 25.739056; 32.603139
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Layout: grammar
KV60A: slim down, don't think we need the big quotes etc, kept refs. feel free to revert and change it up!!
Line 38: Line 38:
The identification of this mummy as Hatshepsut hinges on the contents of a wooden box inscribed with her cartouches discovered inside the cache [[DB320]]. When it was CT-scanned in 2007, it was found to contain a mummified liver and intestine, as well as a molar tooth that lacks one root.<ref name="Hawass Saleem 54-55">{{cite book |last1=Hawass |first1=Zahi |last2=Saleem |first2=Sahar N. |title=Scanning the Pharaohs : CT Imaging of the New Kingdom Royal Mummies |date=2016 |publisher=The American University in Cairo |location=Cairo |isbn=978-977-416-673-0 |pages=54-55}}</ref> The tooth was found to match the size, shape, and density of the remaining molars, as well as lacking the same root that is still present in the jaw.<ref name="Hawass Saleem 59-63"/><ref name=Hawass />
The identification of this mummy as Hatshepsut hinges on the contents of a wooden box inscribed with her cartouches discovered inside the cache [[DB320]]. When it was CT-scanned in 2007, it was found to contain a mummified liver and intestine, as well as a molar tooth that lacks one root.<ref name="Hawass Saleem 54-55">{{cite book |last1=Hawass |first1=Zahi |last2=Saleem |first2=Sahar N. |title=Scanning the Pharaohs : CT Imaging of the New Kingdom Royal Mummies |date=2016 |publisher=The American University in Cairo |location=Cairo |isbn=978-977-416-673-0 |pages=54-55}}</ref> The tooth was found to match the size, shape, and density of the remaining molars, as well as lacking the same root that is still present in the jaw.<ref name="Hawass Saleem 59-63"/><ref name=Hawass />


Doubts have been cast on this attribution; Egyptology writer Dylan Bickerstaffe wrote that "it is important that the join with the root in the mouth of the mummy is physically corroborated. DNA tests should then also be able to confirm that the tooth and KV60A are one and the same person."<ref>Bickerstaffe, D., [http://www.egyptologyforum.org/THOE/Heritage_of_Egypt_1.pdf The Burial of Hatshepsut]. ''The Heritage of Egypt'', Issue 1 - January 2008, pp. 2-9.</ref> Later, in a 2013 book, science journalist [[Jo Marchant]] reported:<blockquote>Most Egyptologists I’ve spoken to are very skeptical that this mummy has anything to do with Hatshepsut, and say they would like to study the team’s evidence. Unfortunately, neither the CT scans nor the DNA results have yet been published in a scientific journal. (Gad and Corthals [the DNA researchers] are quite open about the fact that their DNA results are far too preliminary to publish, and although Selim [who did the CT scan] describes the CT identification of Hatshepsut as "one of our greatest discoveries," he acknowledges that it has yet to be confirmed by DNA analysis.)<ref>Marchant, J., (2013), [https://books.google.com/books?id=q_xyTVxo8BkC&pg=PT118&dq=hatshepsut+kv60&hl=en&sa=X&ei=bh0gVLDGCuPW7Qai74HACw&ved=0CEEQ6AEwBDgU#v=onepage&q=hatshepsut%20kv60&f=false ''The Shadow King: The Bizarre Afterlife of King Tut's Mummy''], Da Capo Press, 2013, Chapter 13.</ref></blockquote>
However, doubt has been cast on the validity of this attribution; the tooth may have been misidentified,<ref name="Thimes 2008">{{cite journal |last1=Thimes |first1=J. L. |title=A Dental Observation |journal=KMT: A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt |date=2008 |volume=19 |issue=3 |pages=6-7}}</ref> and the match has yet to be confirmed by DNA testing.<ref>Bickerstaffe, D., [http://www.egyptologyforum.org/THOE/Heritage_of_Egypt_1.pdf The Burial of Hatshepsut]. ''The Heritage of Egypt'', Issue 1 - January 2008, pp. 2-9.</ref><ref>Marchant, J., (2013), [https://books.google.com/books?id=q_xyTVxo8BkC&pg=PT118&dq=hatshepsut+kv60&hl=en&sa=X&ei=bh0gVLDGCuPW7Qai74HACw&ved=0CEEQ6AEwBDgU#v=onepage&q=hatshepsut%20kv60&f=false ''The Shadow King: The Bizarre Afterlife of King Tut's Mummy''], Da Capo Press, 2013, Chapter 13.</ref>


A large resin-covered coffin fragment recovered from the burial chamber was found, when cleaned, to name a hitherto unknown templesinger called Ty. Ryan suggests in his retrospective that, given the concerns over the accuracy of the identification of KV60A as Hatshepsut, it may have been readily accepted that the tomb belonged to a royal nurse and a singer if Elizabeth Thomas had not suggested Hatshepsut as one of the occupants.<ref name="Ryan 2019-2020">{{cite journal |last1=Ryan |first1=Donald P. |title=KV60: A Retrospective |journal=KMT: A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt |date=2019-2020 |volume=30 |issue=4 |pages=61-66}}</ref>
A large resin-covered coffin fragment recovered from the burial chamber was found, when cleaned, to name a hitherto unknown templesinger called Ty. Ryan suggests in his retrospective that, given the concerns over the accuracy of the identification of KV60A as Hatshepsut, it may have been readily accepted that the tomb belonged to a royal nurse and a singer if Elizabeth Thomas had not suggested Hatshepsut as one of the occupants.<ref name="Ryan 2019-2020">{{cite journal |last1=Ryan |first1=Donald P. |title=KV60: A Retrospective |journal=KMT: A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt |date=2019-2020 |volume=30 |issue=4 |pages=61-66}}</ref>

Revision as of 11:22, 4 September 2020

KV60
Burial site of Sitre In and Hatshepsut
KV60 is located in Egypt
KV60
KV60
Coordinates25°44′20.6″N 32°36′11.3″E / 25.739056°N 32.603139°E / 25.739056; 32.603139
LocationEast Valley of the Kings
Discovered1903
Excavated byHoward Carter
Edward R. Ayrton
Donald P. Ryan
← Previous
KV59
Next →
KV61

Tomb KV60 in Egypt's Valley of the Kings is one of the more perplexing tombs of the Theban Necropolis, due to the uncertainty over the identity of one female mummy found there (KV60A). She is thought by some, such as the Egyptologist Elizabeth Thomas, to be that of the Eighteenth Dynasty pharaoh Hatshepsut.[1] This identification has been advocated by Egyptologist Zahi Hawass.[2]

Layout

Isometric, plan and elevation images of KV60 taken from a 3d model

This small, uninscribed tomb is located approximately 11.3 metres (37 ft) front of the entrance of the tomb of Mentuherkhepshef (KV19). It consists of a rough, steep, flight of stairs leading to a doorway blocked with large stones. A pair of niches are cut into the wall just inside the entrance. A straight passage that is about 8 metres (26 ft) long descends to a low, roughly cut chamber which measures about 5.5 by 6.5 by 2 metres (18.0 ft × 21.3 ft × 6.6 ft) high. A small side chamber branches off about halfway down the descending corridor.[3]

Discovery and investigation

This tomb was discovered by Howard Carter in 1903 during excavations conducted by the Antiquities Service on behalf of Theodore M. Davis. The burial was found to have been ransacked in antiquity but still held two female mummies, one lying in the base of a coffin, and some mummified geese. Carter reclosed the tomb, only removing the geese.[4]

In 1906, Edward R. Ayrton reopened it while clearing KV19; he removed one mummy (KV60B) together with the coffin base to the Egyptian Museum.[5] Since neither Carter nor Ayrton drew plans or maps indicating the location of the tomb, the whereabouts of the tomb became forgotten.

In 1989, the tomb was rediscovered, reopened and properly excavated by a team led by Donald P. Ryan and Mark Papworth. They found the tomb corridor littered with assorted debris; in niches on either side of the door were piled various broken pieces of funerary equipment, including the face of a coffin, its golden surface and inlaid eyes having been adzed off in antiquity. A wedjat eye was painted in each niche. An unwrapped piece of mummified meat sat on the doorstep of the small side chamber. This chamber, which was not noted by Carter, contained the discarded wrappings of the leg, which may have looked like a small human mummy when wrapped, and the moved limestone blocking that originally sealed the room's entrance. The burial chamber was found to be relatively clean, but was scattered with fragments of a burial. A pile of mummified food offerings sat opposite the entrance, and in the centre of the floor, still lay the lone female mummy (KV60A). Following mapping and excavation, she was placed in a new wooden coffin, and left in the tomb, which was resealed with a new metal door.[3]

Mummies

KV60A

The KV60A mummy, thought to be that of Hatshepsut

This mummy is reasonably preserved, with a height of 159 centimetres (5.22 ft), and aged 50-60 years old at the time of her death. She was obese in life, and suffered from poor health; many of her teeth are missing or badly decayed, and a single root from a molar is retained in the jaw. This tooth appears to have been abscessed and extracted just before death. Her poor oral health combined with her weight may indicate she had diabetes. Her brain was not removed. Her heart is preserved in her chest and her torso is filled with embalming packs.[6] She was eviscerated through the pelvic floor, perhaps due to her weight. Her left arm is crossed over her chest while the right arm is at her side. The fingernails of her left hand are tinted red and outlined in black.[3] She may have had cancer: a tumor destroyed part of her left hip, and spread to her lumbar vertebrae. Her cause of death is assumed to be due to the metastatic cancer, complications of diabetes, or an abscessed molar that was extracted shortly before her death.[6]

Elizabeth Thomas was the first to propose that this mummy was that of Hatshepsut, relocated to the tomb of her nurse by Thutmose III, as part of his campaign of official hostility towards her.[7] Ryan and Papworth's 1989 excavation produced evidence both in favour of, and casting doubt on the suggestion. On the supporting side, the mummy proved to be that of a relatively elderly lady, with her left arm flexed in the pose thought to mark royal women of the 18th Dynasty. On the other hand, few inscribed or dateable materials were recovered, meaning that a date range could not be firmly established. The wooden coffin face had a notch, presumably to take a false beard despite the fact that the tomb contained only women, and Hatshepsut is known to have used a false beard. Ryan felt, at that time, that advocating for KV60A as the mummy of Hatshepsut would be "foolishly premature", instead suggesting she could be any of a number of royal women or nurses from the period.[3]

The identification of this mummy as Hatshepsut hinges on the contents of a wooden box inscribed with her cartouches discovered inside the cache DB320. When it was CT-scanned in 2007, it was found to contain a mummified liver and intestine, as well as a molar tooth that lacks one root.[8] The tooth was found to match the size, shape, and density of the remaining molars, as well as lacking the same root that is still present in the jaw.[6][2]

However, doubt has been cast on the validity of this attribution; the tooth may have been misidentified,[9] and the match has yet to be confirmed by DNA testing.[10][11]

A large resin-covered coffin fragment recovered from the burial chamber was found, when cleaned, to name a hitherto unknown templesinger called Ty. Ryan suggests in his retrospective that, given the concerns over the accuracy of the identification of KV60A as Hatshepsut, it may have been readily accepted that the tomb belonged to a royal nurse and a singer if Elizabeth Thomas had not suggested Hatshepsut as one of the occupants.[12]

KV60B

This well-preserved mummy is about 1.5 metres (4.9 ft) tall. She has long red hair remaining on her head. Her right arm at her side, and the left arm is placed across her torso; the left hand is closed. She was eviscerated through a V-shaped embalming incision. Traces of fine linen bandages remain, with the fingers individually wrapped. Robbers looking for valuables have torn away much of the bandaging, which is bundled at the bottom of the coffin.[13] She was once thought by Hawass to be the mummy of Hatshepsut.[14]

The 2.13 metres (7.0 ft) coffin base she was found lying in was inscribed with the name and title wr šdt nfrw nswt In, meaning the Great Royal Nurse, In. This personage has been widely identified with Sitre In, the royal nurse of Hatshepsut, who is known from her sandstone statue from Deir el Bahari.[13]

References

Notes

  1. ^ Highfield, Roger (27 June 2007). "How I found Queen Hatshepsut". Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 14 July 2020. Retrieved 2014-09-22. {{cite news}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 25 March 2010 suggested (help)
  2. ^ a b "Search for Hatshepsut".
  3. ^ a b c d Ryan, Donald P. (1990). "Who Is Buried In KV60?". KMT: A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt. 1 (1): 34–63.
  4. ^ Carter, Howard (1903). "Report of Work Done in Upper Egypt (1902-1903)". Annales du Service des antiquités de l'Egypte. 4: 176–177. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  5. ^ Reeves, Nicholas; Wilkinson, Richard H. (2010). The Complete Valley of the Kings : Tombs and Treasures of Egypt's Greatest Pharaohs (Paperback reprint ed.). London: Thames and Hudson. pp. 186–187. ISBN 978-0-500-28403-2.
  6. ^ a b c Hawass, Zahi; Saleem, Sahar N. (2016). Scanning the Pharaohs : CT Imaging of the New Kingdom Royal Mummies. Cairo: The American University in Cairo. pp. 59–63. ISBN 978-977-416-673-0.
  7. ^ Thomas, Elizabeth (1966). The Royal Necropoleis of Thebes. Princeton. p. 138.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  8. ^ Hawass, Zahi; Saleem, Sahar N. (2016). Scanning the Pharaohs : CT Imaging of the New Kingdom Royal Mummies. Cairo: The American University in Cairo. pp. 54–55. ISBN 978-977-416-673-0.
  9. ^ Thimes, J. L. (2008). "A Dental Observation". KMT: A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt. 19 (3): 6–7.
  10. ^ Bickerstaffe, D., The Burial of Hatshepsut. The Heritage of Egypt, Issue 1 - January 2008, pp. 2-9.
  11. ^ Marchant, J., (2013), The Shadow King: The Bizarre Afterlife of King Tut's Mummy, Da Capo Press, 2013, Chapter 13.
  12. ^ Ryan, Donald P. (2019–2020). "KV60: A Retrospective". KMT: A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt. 30 (4): 61–66.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  13. ^ a b Hawass, Zahi; Saleem, Sahar N. (2016). Scanning the Pharaohs : CT Imaging of the New Kingdom Royal Mummies. Cairo: The American University in Cairo. pp. 58–59. ISBN 978-977-416-673-0.
  14. ^ Hawass, Zahi (2006). "Quest For The Mummy Of Hatshepsut: Could She Be the Lady in the Attic of the Egyptian Museum, Cairo?". KMT: A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt. 17 (2): 40–43.

Further reading

  • Siliotti, A. Guide to the Valley of the Kings and to the Theban Necropolises and Temples, 1996, A.A. Gaddis, Cairo.