Jump to content

Talk:Gameplay of World of Warcraft: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m Reverted 1 edit by ArchePaladin (talk) to last revision by Harryboyles
Line 86: Line 86:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

== Will need a new “Subject”, World of Warcraft is forcing illegal, illogical views of women into the gameplay mechanics ==

World of Warcraft a sexist scandal to encourage the detriment of women as a paid service; irrefutable

I have impunity in Minneapolis, Minnesota and it is verifiable.

I, Brandon Holden, am a person without narcissisms therefore I can do no wrong. I cannot lie and I speak without bias.

I have discovered, using telepathy, instant recall, and non-narcissistic based observation, that Chris Metzen allowed world of Warcraft to be developed to support sexism through a baked in mechanic which functions through the algorithm of the game, a RNG variable known as the “Sex differential Modifier”. Or SDM. This is a real variable inside of the logic of the game and describes the illogical sexist nature of World of Warcraft.
To truly understand the SDM, or Sex differential modifier, it’s a variable, something which stores information to be accessed, inside of the RNG which takes information from female based characters through logging from within the combat sequence of WoW, and during each “roll” performed within that combat sequence. This modifier is filled with variables that the AI uses to handicap women reducing their effectiveness through performance reductions, it was placed Inside of the RNG to avoid detection, instead of it being raw data where it could Be observed easily.
The reasoning it was placed within the RNG is because they could still advertise Man/woman characters as equal but only up until they began combat. RNG unless dismantled by the logic Used to create it; is undetectable - which in this case required someone not sexist, therefore something can be said to appear in a sexist environment to be equal but not perform as such since the RNG abstracts possible differences between comparisons. This is because no one will question what is normally seen as “normal”. Sexism is ingrained into human dna, I was born conscious and with empathy, so I am an anomaly, this gives me the ability to see outside and observe usual human logic.
This modifier exists because during the time of development for world of Warcraft Chris wanted it to mimic what he perceived as reality, also influenced by the belief that not many women would play, and also within his perspective that no man would play a woman thus no one would actually discover this mechanic, and that it could be argued that the game was intended for men since men are the fighters Incase this particular modifier got them in trouble and they needed a scapegoat.

It is such logic as this that allowed for the programming of the “Sex difference modifier” and it impacts every woman character in the game. This modifier is implemented into the RNG of the game and permanently handicaps women characters in combat. The modifier is designed so that the game may “imitate” women being “weaker” in combat thus needing to be more “desperate” and require more “effort” to beat a male. This means the RNG could modify women based on variables such as how long they’ve been in combat, abilities and items used to create RNG which gets progressively worse to handicap the performance of a woman’s character.
I am able to actually express that Chris Metzen, in game chat (to make my statements verifiable) is “a sexist” without being banned or reprimanded. This is because the SDM ;sex differential modifier) can be confirmed through the sole operation of the game; making logging in, by default, a sexist nature and purpose designed to the intention handicap of women. This puts the head designer, Chris metzen, at fault which he allowed the SDM to exist and inspired its creation.
It is within this illogical nature, where I cannot be banned for these statements while also rendering the game unplayable by imbalanced nature, which proves the sexist, illegal, illogical nature of its design that no one can actually play WoW until they remove the “sex differential modifier” or SDM, but that would also declare Chris Metzen and the development team sexists. This means no one should actually be capable of logging in since sexism is actually against ingame rules (and outside world laws as well). So the fate of declaration as sexism is irrefutable and unavoidable. In addition to this, later additions of WoW still feature the SDM as the SDM reaches beyond into expansion packs and gets progressively worse as it operates through “far analysis assumptions”. This means it becomes a more integral part of the games source code as time goes on. The SDM was “altered” for the last time in 2007 for the burning crusade, which introduced “ego boosting” which is an effect of the SDM to enhance the performance of men near women during combat. So this means it’s still persistent in modern forms of the game and is a conscious effort to subject women to inferiority.

The game is essentially running illegally and illogically. [[User:ArchePaladin|ArchePaladin]] ([[User talk:ArchePaladin|talk]]) 16:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:02, 13 September 2020

WikiProject iconVideo games C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Wikiproject videogame assessment

Article re-assessed as B class, here's a few suggestions:

  • The article lead is weak, there is now enough information available for two full-sized paragraphs which give the reader all the relevant information, currently it takes an extremely distal view.
  • Watch out for short paragraphs, try and merge them into larger ones, it's not a major problem with this article but it could be improved. For instance, in the second half of characters there's details about character classes and jobs, as well as guilds and players banding together, try to separate these two and leave more rounded paragrpahs.
  • Under questing:"These are indicated by having yellow exclamation marks (!) above their heads, while yellow question marks represent quests ready to hand back and complete." Does the exclamation mark need to be there in brackets? The second part of the sentence is odd, a quest isn't a physical object so there's nothing to "hand back". Also it could use some clarification, does a question mark mean that the quest has been completed and that talking to the NPC again will result in a reward?
  • Dungeons: is there anything remarkable in terms of geography or strategies available in different dungeons?
  • Peer review - suggest taking it for a PR, this article could be a GA candidate but I'd suggest getting more opinions first.

Nice work on this, hope the above are of some use. Someoneanother 22:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the assessment, it's much appreciated. I'll try to incorporate your changes and organise for a peer review or two, possibly aiming for GA or A class. I'm also considering appropriate illustrations in order to improve the article, but it's still early days. Gazimoff WriteRead 14:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the template

Is it really necessary to add this article to the games section at the template? -71.190.180.67 (talk) 00:49, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean here. Could you explain please? Many thanks, Gazimoff WriteRead 14:46, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
At the bottom of the page, at the world of warcraft template, this is listed at the games section. I think only games should be in that section not gameplay. -150.108.232.25 (talk) 02:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Combination

I think that this article and the main WoW article should be combined. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eoghan1234 (talkcontribs) 20:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a good spinout as it is used in the main WoW article, as well as the Burning Crusade and Wrath of the Lich King expansions. If anything, now that we have this spinout article the section in World of Warcraft should be trimmed down further. Hope this helps, Gazimoff 13:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrath of the Lich King

There is a fair bit of stuff about the Burning Crusade (first expansion), and as such, i think some more info about the second ex-pac, wrath, should be added! I would do this myself, but a-levels are taking up so much time.. -.-

86.129.210.214 (talk) 22:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meeting Stones

I removed a sourced passage on the function of meeting stones. The information was incorrect. They do not serve to help players find groups. There is an interface option that allows players to do that from anywhere for up to three different instances that can group them automatically or allow them to see who else is looking for a group for that instance. The purpose of meeting stones is to summon party members to that instance, since the game world is large and it is inconvenient for every player to run there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.129.148.191 (talk) 14:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

World map picture

I noticed that the picture of the world map is out of date, as it does not include Northrend. This could use being updated. 204.185.177.250 (talk) 19:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grinding

This article doesn't talk about grinding, which is the entire gameplay experience when you get to endgame. That and hanging around at mount parties waiting for something entertaining to happen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.50.131.77 (talk) 05:37, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a rather point of view thing to include, and as such would not really be worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a fansite, or a list of gripes had with the game. --Taelus (talk) 07:59, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Very POV, as it's only your experience within the game. "Endgame", meaning level capped? No one is required to grind anything at that point. Or endgame meaning 70-80? There are far more quests in the game required to fill that gap of experience. Personally, I was able to do 70-80 in three Northrend zones of quests, no grinding at all. Gpia7r (talk) 12:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia...ahhhh, that made me laugh out loud. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.78.205.178 (talk) 19:34, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Character Creation Image

It's not really that large of a change, but it seems the Character Creation Screenshot on the Article is out of date and doesn't include the new races for Cataclysm. Just wondering if:

  1. It would be possible to update it.
  2. Make it a bit larger for people to actually see it.

Thanks, Swifty705 (talk) 18:40, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Fairly new to Wikipedia, so any help would be appreciated :)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Gameplay of World of Warcraft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]