Jump to content

User talk:Claygate: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
WP:AIV
Line 65: Line 65:


Just a note, summaries like [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Homestead_Act&diff=prev&oldid=98038853 this] are not made by the editors/anons themselves, but are actually [[WP:AES|automatic edit summaries]]. Thanks, :) [[User:Cbrown1023|Cbrown1023]] 23:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Just a note, summaries like [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Homestead_Act&diff=prev&oldid=98038853 this] are not made by the editors/anons themselves, but are actually [[WP:AES|automatic edit summaries]]. Thanks, :) [[User:Cbrown1023|Cbrown1023]] 23:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

: Thanks for the info. I didn't realize that and is good to know, as otherwise it make the vandals seem even more blatant. --[[User:Claygate|Claygate]] 00:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:05, 3 January 2007

Hi, Claygate, and welcome to Wikipedia! The size and scope of this project can sometimes be daunting for newcomers, so I thought I would say hello and offer you a few helpful links that might make contributing easier (and I do hope you will continue to stay and contribute).

If you've still got questions, the FAQ and the Help desk are good places to start. Listing yourself at the new user log will likely guarantee a response from friendly fellow editors as well. If there's anything I can help with, don't hestitate to drop me a note on my talk page -- just remember to sign your comments with four tildes (like this: ~~~~) and your signature will automatically be added.

Thanks particularly for your contributions and comments on Habitat for Humanity; I've edited your additions a little bit so they're a little better formatted for the wiki ("wikified") and switched a sentence or two. If you or another editor doesn't beat me to it, I plan on tackling the new criticisms section there shortly; I think it is important to have the material in there, but some of the assertions those paragraph make certainly do need to be verified or reworded to better align with a neutral point of view.

Again, welcome!

MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip 04:21, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Frost column

Hi Claygate! I just created the article frost column. The phenomenon appears to be somewhat similar to Frost flowers but the shape is unmistakenly different, also in the Japanese version ( ja:霜柱 ) which is where I got the information. What do you think? Is any merging required? Jason7825 02:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jason, I think it is different enough to keep in a separate article and I see that you have added it to the See Also section of both articles, which is good, thanks. --Claygate 03:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User 162.58.0.60

Hi, I unlisted that vandal because he had not vandalised for a long time: you reported him at 19:26, 30 December 2005; his last vandal activity was at 13:55 that same day - that's just under six hours later. The way I see it, he seems to have stopped. Also, in my opinion, he has not been sufficiently warned: he has only been given {{test3}} - what about {{test}}, {{test2}} and {{test4}}? Izehar 19:13, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

TAMU page

Just wanted to give you a heads up that I replied to your comment on the TAMU page. Thanks for all of your citations! Dothivalla 02:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of source of article.

I've reverted the removal for the source of the monk article. When I wrote this page, I used that source with the author's permission. Recently, I realized that it didn't have a link and I added it in. Please see the history of the page. My old username was AlexPlank. I will sign in with that name to prove it if you want. Perl 20:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alex, I don't understand why you need the author's permission since you were the author. It seems like just a way to promote your other website rather than a source of lots of Monk content. --Claygate 22:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correct version

Yes, I see that now. Thanks, Tom Harrison Talk 02:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't remove the report, I only commented on it. I realize that the user's edits go against consensus, but from what I saw, the user likely doesn't know that. All they've seen is being accused of vandalism, which a content dispute is not, and which is likely not what the user intended their edits to be. I suggest leaving a note on the user's talk page explaining about the page's consensus rather than biting a newbie's head off with a block. Regards, —bbatsell ¿? 04:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


templates substituted by a bot as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 08:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey James, Check out the wiki article ive been working on Andman8 03:24, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, really good article! --Claygate 12:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KISD

It's probably BS so I moved it to the talk page. Andman8 01:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KISD is one billion in debt so i also highly doubt "der fuhrer world" has any funding. Andman8 03:56, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia as a source

Uh - A lot of schools and organizations forbid using Wikipedia as a scholastic resource. Have you ever tried citing Wikipedia as a source in a university essay? Universities won't let you use Wikipedia because Wikipedia doesn't have quality control that other sources have. It's simple, really. WhisperToMe 19:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt very few universities block the access to it, though - that's the controversy. --Claygate 01:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in print or on google but maybe the katy sun will do an expose eventually. Andman8 02:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV

Just a note, summaries like this are not made by the editors/anons themselves, but are actually automatic edit summaries. Thanks, :) Cbrown1023 23:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I didn't realize that and is good to know, as otherwise it make the vandals seem even more blatant. --Claygate 00:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]