Talk:Alltel: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
: Oh yeah! The commercials where the Alltel guy hangs out with the other brands' logos. That should be mentioned. [[User:Sweetloulou|loulou]] 00:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC) |
: Oh yeah! The commercials where the Alltel guy hangs out with the other brands' logos. That should be mentioned. [[User:Sweetloulou|loulou]] 00:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
: Yeah, thats the whole reason I looked this up. im dissapointed it wasnt there :/ |
|||
== 206.82.89.114 - NPOV/Vandal == |
== 206.82.89.114 - NPOV/Vandal == |
Revision as of 06:14, 4 January 2007
United States: Arkansas Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
Is there *really* a need to provide a listing of all those corporate subsidiaries? Most of them are quite obscure and are not recognizable to the average person. Perhaps that list should be moved to a separate article. – Swid (talk | edits) 18:59, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate these links as if Googling a subsidiary, this is one of the few places to find the connections.
"My Circle"
- On April 21, 2006 Alltel launched a unique program called "My Circle".
I don't think this program is very unique - as it is simply MCI's old "Friends and Family" plan made for wireless networks. Anyone else agree? 70.106.220.156 19:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
It is unique, no other plan is currently available that is similar. Strunke 09:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)strunke
I think it should be struck. Regardless of whether it's unique, Wikipedia should not be used as a platform for promoting companies, selling services or promoting stock. That's what a company Web site is for. There is much more on this site that also should be struck. 19:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Removed
Subsidiary companies
I agree that the list of corporate subsidiaries is way too long. Corporate entries should not be advertisements is indeed an ad, it would seem. I vote to pull the list of subs off.
It may be worth keeping but in a separate article.
Advertising section
I'd like to see a section on their slogans and advertising campaigns. Their latest campaign featuring look-alike spokepeople for Cingular, Verizon, T-Mobile and Sprint is pretty entertaining. (And something they got in legal hot water for, too) --Navstar 03:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yeah! The commercials where the Alltel guy hangs out with the other brands' logos. That should be mentioned. loulou 00:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, thats the whole reason I looked this up. im dissapointed it wasnt there :/
206.82.89.114 - NPOV/Vandal
Would the person from 206.82.89.114 please stop adding NPOV bashing to the opening paragraph. Jonathan Auer 17:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Corporate Equality Index
Should the result of 0% ALLTEL reciveed (the lowest in the study) in the 2004 Human rights campagin be added to the page?--Cosmoincarlow 15:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Simple Freedom
Simple Freedom is actually owned by Walmart. Alltel simply provides some back-end opertions.
Shareholder friendly but not customer friendly?
I removed both the statement about Alltel priding itself on producing shareholder value, and the one saying that producing shareholder value is not always in customer's best interests. I think both are vacuous statements that lend nothing to the article.
18:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Tom G.