User talk:WikiAgent013

WikiAgent013, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WikiAgent013! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with Die Hard 2. Your edits appear to be an act of disruptive editing and have been or will be reverted. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BattleshipMan (talk) 20:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey! Stop screwing my edits! If you don't like my additions you can start your own website! You don't own the Wikipedia Die Hard pages. If you delete any more of my contributions I will file harassment complaints against you. Thank you for your time!

October 2020

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

It is you who are engaging in harassment. This is a collaborative project. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

1) Trying to intimidate me to not report harassment is harassment! 2) The Special Edition content is part of the movie! 3) If special edition details are not normally included on Wiki then they should be because they are part of the film's history. Mention of any and all special features are a legitimate contribution on Wiki! Therefore, its removal is NOT in line. 4) Do not vandalize my work! It took time to research all of the extra features for this movie. If you have a problem with my contributions then contact me first. Don't just delete other people's legitimate work simply because you think that what they have to say is not relevant. I have been a fan of this franchise for more than 30 years. Who are you to suddenly come along and dictate what I can or cannot contribute? I made these contributions so that new fans of the franchise can expand their experience and learn more about these movies. Do not vandalize my work!

You have failed to address the reason for your block and are continuing on your confrontational path. Please read WP:VANDALISM. Making false accusations of vandalism is disruptive. If you resume this behavior after your current block expires, the next block will be for a longer time. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it

No, I have addressed. I have been making contributions to the Die Hard movie pages. BattleshipMan keeps deleting my contributions and is also complaining about me to other people on Wiki to get them to gang up on me. All of my contributions are legitimate. They help tell about the history of these movies. New fans of these movies have a right to know these important details. My contributions were deleted without contacting me first first. None of my contributions have violated policy. I have not made accusations of vandalism! I am the victim of vandalism and false accusations. BattleshipMan keeps deleting my work. He does not own Wiki! Harassing someone is disruptive.

Do you plan on filing an unblock request? If so, follow the directions I gave you above, and another administrator will decide. Please be aware that Wikipedia is based on consensus and you do not have the right to insist on your preferred version when other editors disagree. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

TBH, if you fly off the handle like this every time you have a disagreement with someone, your tenure here will be short-lived. Please read up on WP:CIVIL and WP:DR. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Well, you might as well read WP:BRD. Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 35931

UTRS appeal #35931 is now closed. My reply is carried over below.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You are blocked for making personal attacks, which you have continued to do here. You will need also to explain how to deal with editing disputes. (We don't call each other names.) Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. (Please do not criticize or find fault with anyone else. Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior.) Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) . As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 

Thank you for your attention to these matters.

deepfriedokra

English Wikipedia Administrator

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiAgent013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

How my edit was "unconstructive"? No, my edits were constructive. Another user keeps deleting my work and I was suspended in retaliation. I didn't attack anyone. I'm the one who has been attacked and when I warned the other user to stop deleting my posts I was suspended. I am requesting to be unblocked so that I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia.WikiAgent013 (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- ferret (talk) 23:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• @Cullen328, Deepfriedokra, and Masem: As information, while reviewing this appeal I reverted and revdel'd three instances of COPYVIO, plot summaries copied from other sites and/or official summary. -- ferret (talk) 23:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Ferret, thank you for the update and for doing that essential work. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

@WikiAgent013: You introduced content copyrighted elsewhere

• HERE and
• HERE and
• HERE and
• HERE and
• HERE and
• HERE.
• Please do not do so again. If you do, you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Wikipedia is a free content encyclopedia. Any content here must be licensable under GFDL, creative commons or in the public domain. The source of such copied content must state explicitly and categorically that it it is not copyright protected. The sources you copied from explicitly state that the content is copyright protected. Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:19, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

sourcing requirements

"All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." A blog like Explosive Action may not meet that requirement. I too have a blog. It is not suitable for use as a source on Wikipedia. Though, come to think of it, it is compatibly licensed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Godzilla 2014

Please do not add special features list like you did here (1). It is WP:FAN and has no value to the article. Armegon (talk) 20:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 23:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

After blocking you for continuing your past disruptive edits and copyright violations, I realized this was not your first account. Do not appeal your block here, do so on your original account. -- ferret (talk) 23:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

• @Cullen328, Deepfriedokra, and Masem: As information. -- ferret (talk) 23:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)