Epistle of James

The Epistle of James is a book in the Christian New Testament canon.

Authorship and Composition

The author identifies himself in the opening verse as "James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ". From the middle of the third century, patristic authors cited the Epistle as written by James the Just, a relation of Jesus and first Bishop of Jerusalem. This James was not one of the Twelve Apostles, but was first of the Seventy Disciples, and Paul described him as "the brother of the Lord" in Galatians 1:19 and as one of the three pillars of the Church in 2:9. John Calvin and others suggested that the author was Saint James the Less, son of Alphaeus, apparently the brother of Matthew the Evangelist. To confuse the matter, James the Just has sometimes been considered the same individual as James the Less. If written by James the Just, the place and time of the writing of the epistle would be Jerusalem, where James was residing before his martyrdom in 62.

Authorship has also occasionally been attributed to the apostle James the Great, brother of John the Evangelist and son of Zebedee. The letter does mention persecutions in the present tense (2:6), and this is consistent with the persecution in Jerusalem during which James the Great was martyred (Acts 12:1). However, the early date is challenged by some of the letter’s content, which appears to be a clarification of St. Paul’s teachings on justification found in his Epistle to the Romans, written c. 54. If written by James the Great, the location would have also been Jerusalem, sometime before 45.

A contrarian view regarding authorship that is emerging, is that the book of James was wrtitten during the earthly ministry of Jesus. The basis for this being the lack of any refrence to the Resurrection within the book of James. The entire New Testament is based on the fact that Jesus was seen alive after he died. The fact that James does not mention this is a disturbing precedent that distinguishes him from all the other New Testament writers. A solution to this problem is that James the Great hadn't yet experienced the event. Another reason for this viewpoint is the commonality of concerns between James and the Gospels. The lifestyle that the author is advocating is very similar to the things that James the Great is hearing from Jesus during the Gospel period, including adhering to the Mosaic law. Also, the overwhelming Old Testament influence is out of step with the ideas that Jesus promotes after the Resurrection. For instance Abraham is mentioned as many times as Jesus, and [[Elijah] is used as anample of how to pray. These are at odds with Jesus commandment to accentuate Him above all other things.

Lastly, some consider the epistle to be pseudepigraphical, and if so then the author could have been anyone.

Those were first definitely quoted by Origen, and possibly a bit earlier by Irenaeus of Lyons as well as Clement of Alexandria in a lost work according to Eusebius.

The letter of JAMES is, therefore, logically thought to have been written at any time from 29 to 200.

Canonicity

The Epistle of James was included among the 27 New Testament books first listed by Athanasius of Alexandria and was confirmed as a canonical epistle of the New Testament by a series of councils in the fourth century. Today, virtually all denominations of Christianity consider this book to be a canonical epistle of the New Testament. See Biblical canon

In the first centuries of the Church the authenticity of the Epistle was doubted by some, and amongst others by Theodore, Bishop of Mopsuestia in Cilicia; it is therefore deuterocanonical. It is missing in the Muratorian fragment, and because of the silence of several of the western churches regarding it, Eusebius classes it amongst the antilegomena or contested writings (Historia ecclesiae, 3.25; 2.23). St. Jerome gives a similar appraisal but adds that with time it had been universally admitted. Its late recognition in the Church, especially in the West, may be explained by the fact that it was written for or by Jewish Christians, and therefore not widely circulated among the Gentile Churches. There is some indication that a few groups distrusted the book because of its doctrine. In Reformation times a few theologians, most notably Martin Luther, argued that this epistle was too defective to be part of the canonical New Testament. This is probably due to the book's specific teaching that faith alone is not enough for salvation (James 2:24), which seemed to contradict his doctrine of sola fide (faith alone).

Contents

The epistle was addressed to the Jews of the dispersion, "the twelve tribes scattered abroad."

The object of the writer was to enforce the practical duties of the Christian life. The vices against which he warns them are: formalism, which made the service of God consist in washings and outward ceremonies, whereas he reminds them (1:27) that it consists rather in active love and purity; fanaticism, which, under the cloak of religious zeal, was tearing Jerusalem in pieces (1:20); fatalism, which threw its sins on God (1:13); meanness, which crouched before the rich (2:2); falsehood, which had made words and oaths play-things (3:2-12); partisanship (3:14); evil speaking (4:11); boasting (4:16); oppression (5:4). The great lesson which he teaches them as Christians is patience, patience in trial (1:2), patience in good works (1:22-25), patience under provocation (3:17), patience under oppression (5:7), patience under persecution (5:10); and the ground of their patience is that the coming of the Lord drawing nigh, which is to right all wrong (5:8).

Doctrine

Justification

Main articles: justification (theology), Justification by faith alone, and Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification

The letter contains the following famous passage concerning salvation and justification:

“What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? …You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only…? For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.” (James 2:14, 24, 26)

This passage has been cited in Christian theological debates, especially against the Protestant doctrine of Justification by faith alone. This passage has also been contrasted with the teachings of Paul of Tarsus, especially in his Epistle to the Romans (see Romans 3:28). One issue in the debate is the proper rendering of the Greek δικαιωθηναι (dikaiōthēnai). But see also New Perspective on Paul.

Anointing of the Sick

Main article: Anointing of the Sick

James' epistle is also the chief biblical text for anointing of the sick (also called "Last Rites"). James wrote:

"Are any among you sick? They should call for the elders of the church and have them pray over them, anointing them with oil in the name of the Lord. And their prayer offered in faith will heal the sick, and the Lord will make them well. And anyone who has committed sins will be forgiven." (5:14,15).

External links

Online translation of the Epistle of James:

• Online Bible at GospelHall.org
• Catholic Encyclopedia article
• Jewish Encyclopedia: JAMES, GENERAL EPISTLE OF
• Encyclopædia Britannica: James, Epistle of
• Biblaridion magazine: Examining the background to the epistle of James

References

 This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

i rule