MediaWiki talk:WikiLove.js: Difference between revisions
→Deleting goats: new section |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:::::Yeah, agreed — given that they don't work on all screens. Also: wiki-links as they're missing from the other WikiLove options too.-[[User:DoctorWho42|<span style="background-color:#ff0000; color: #e8ff00">🐦Do☭torWho42</span>]]<span style="background-color:#ff0000; color: #e8ff00"> ([[User talk:DoctorWho42|<span style="background-color:#ff0000; color: #e8ff00">⭐</span>]])</span> 19:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC) |
:::::Yeah, agreed — given that they don't work on all screens. Also: wiki-links as they're missing from the other WikiLove options too.-[[User:DoctorWho42|<span style="background-color:#ff0000; color: #e8ff00">🐦Do☭torWho42</span>]]<span style="background-color:#ff0000; color: #e8ff00"> ([[User talk:DoctorWho42|<span style="background-color:#ff0000; color: #e8ff00">⭐</span>]])</span> 19:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
::::::{{done}}. I can see them on my home computer, but at work they are looked the same. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 20:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC) |
::::::{{done}}. I can see them on my home computer, but at work they are looked the same. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 20:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Deleting goats == |
|||
{{edit fully-protected|MediaWiki:WikiLove.js}} |
|||
[[File:Herd of goats Saanen.JPG|thumb|So many goats, so few kittens.]] |
|||
A while back some people added goats to WikiLove during the [[meta:Wikimedia Cuteness Association/Goatification|goatification]] craze of 2017. While I love goats just as much as anyone else (within healthy limits), I fear that their inclusion is reducing the use of the kittens option, which scientific studies have shown are most effective at increasing fine-motor dexterity[https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bf52/2a95f41b0fb9bcb9d6170665977f6dd1499a.pdf] and attentional focus,[https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0046362] both of which contribute to productive Wikipedia editing. Leaving a goat on someone's page, while it may evoke temporarily feelings of joy, euphoria, or confusion, doesn't have as much of a lasting positive impact on the viewer. As such, I'm asking to add the following line to [[MediaWiki:WikiLove.js]]:<br> |
|||
<code>delete $.wikiLoveOptions.types.goat;</code><br> |
|||
Respectfully, [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 20:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:46, 23 October 2020
Protected edit request on 29 June 2017
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
could someone add toast sandwich to the template? I started Template:Toast sandwich for you and Template:WikiLove-toast sandwich, and would love to see the sandwich on there.-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 07:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Not done for now: Please provide the exact code to be inserted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: I hope this code is sufficient for its addition to the already lovely WikiLove list: -🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 03:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
// Adding toast sandwich to food options $.wikiLoveOptions.types.food.subtypes.toast.sandwich = { fields: [ 'header', 'message' ], option: 'Toast sandwich', descr: 'Toast sandwiches are made by putting a thin slice of toast 🔥🍞 between two thin slices of bread 🍞 🍞 with a layer of [[butter]], and adding salt and pepper to taste. 👅 Its origins can be traced to the [[Victorian era|Victorian]] years.', header: 'A toast sandwich for you!', image: 'An image of a toast sandwich, shot from the side.jpg', imageSize: '120px' };
- @MSGJ: is the above code correct or no?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 22:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Seems to be working, but perhaps we can remove the funny symbols 🔥🍞👅 because you can't see them clearly anyway. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, agreed — given that they don't work on all screens. Also: wiki-links as they're missing from the other WikiLove options too.-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 19:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Done. I can see them on my home computer, but at work they are looked the same. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, agreed — given that they don't work on all screens. Also: wiki-links as they're missing from the other WikiLove options too.-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 19:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Seems to be working, but perhaps we can remove the funny symbols 🔥🍞👅 because you can't see them clearly anyway. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: is the above code correct or no?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 22:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleting goats
It is requested that an edit be made to the interface page at MediaWiki:WikiLove.js. (edit · history · last · links)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any interface administrator. Remember to change the |
A while back some people added goats to WikiLove during the goatification craze of 2017. While I love goats just as much as anyone else (within healthy limits), I fear that their inclusion is reducing the use of the kittens option, which scientific studies have shown are most effective at increasing fine-motor dexterity[1] and attentional focus,[2] both of which contribute to productive Wikipedia editing. Leaving a goat on someone's page, while it may evoke temporarily feelings of joy, euphoria, or confusion, doesn't have as much of a lasting positive impact on the viewer. As such, I'm asking to add the following line to MediaWiki:WikiLove.js:
delete $.wikiLoveOptions.types.goat;
Respectfully, Kaldari (talk) 20:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)