Jump to content

Talk:Bolivia: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Bolivia/Archive 2) (bot
Line 295: Line 295:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pueblos originarios de Bolivia.png|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 02:38, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pueblos originarios de Bolivia.png|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 02:38, 12 July 2020 (UTC)


== Notice to editors who delete enormous amounts of info with ZERO "VALID" REASONING - discuss first, don't delete ==
== Notice to editors who delete paragraphs from the page - discuss first, don't delete ==


: Personally, I have added some info to the bolivia page. If you disagree with my previous edits- we can talk it out. Seems obvious but needed to be said given today's incident - don't delete enormous amounts of info on this page either recklessly or deliberately with political intent, but discuss here first.
: My last bad edit was simply using Grammarly to correct some mistakes from other editors, and click publish but it somehow came out weird and was not on purpose. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/984985592 I also tried to fix those errors but it was reverted really quickly before I had the chance. I don't mind at all with materialscientist reverting my bad edits. That was valid. I however do mind alot and am very disappointed when he also deletes all my GOOD edits, and that should be investigated if this proves to be a trend. But I am willing to take this to the talk page if anyone wants to argue but just don't censor illegally. As I have done nothing wrong prior to one bizarre accidental computer error.


Considering this is indeed a political topic, I would expect there will be no shortage of people wanting to delete certain info and use partisan and questionable reasoning. Examples in the past day, was disputes on Ethical Hacking and David Rosnick. Ie. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985021134 and https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985023721
My edits were not warrnted to be deleted. Like I wrote that Anez issued a decree to give security forces immunity from criminal charges and a massacre did occur against the indigenous people and the fact that new york times, a reputed paper had stated the OAS methods were flawed yet fueled chaos in the country and gave my sources to back that info. All my info is backed by sources and should not be censored yet was COMPLETELY deleted and censored ONLY due to a single computing error that wasn't even intentional. I disagree with that and how it was being deleted. If you got an issue with the above info and more. Take it to the talk page.


Of course, edit warring is not okay. Hence if you want to delete such info about Ethical Hacking or David Rosnick, take it to here and make your arguments here and show your proof. And if anyone deletes large amounts of info prematurely using flawed reasoning or no reasoning, do expect an editor to nudge you to give your reasoning on the talk page and to discuss it out first.
Again can't stress this more than enough, discuss, don't delete prematurely. I have reverted to my last good edit plus finally fixed a few of those grammatical errors that I targeted prior to the buggy external Wikipedia computer errors. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/984984458 If you disagree with my previous edits- we can talk it out. Seems obvious but needed to be said given today;s incident - don't delete enormous amounts of info on this page either recklessly or deliberately with political intent, but discuss here before deleting tremendous amounts of info. Cheers from down under. [[Special:Contributions/49.180.129.245|49.180.129.245]] ([[User talk:49.180.129.245|talk]]) 09:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Cheers from down under. [[Special:Contributions/49.180.129.245|49.180.129.245]] ([[User talk:49.180.129.245|talk]]) 09:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:13, 24 October 2020

Template:Vital article

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage


This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2018 and 22 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nikki048 (article contribs). This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2018 and 22 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tnorman27 (article contribs).

Aircraft Inventory

Aircraft Origin Type Versions In service[1] Notes
Trainers
Aerotec T-23 Uirapuru  Brazil trainer T-23 7
k-8  China trainer K-8 6
Beechcraft T-34 Mentor  United States trainer FMA T-34B 21
Canadair T-33 Silver Star  Canada Attack/Trainer AT-33A 19
Lancair 320  United States trainer 1
NEIVA T-25 Universal  Brazil trainer 6
Pilatus PC-7 Turbo Trainer  Switzerland trainer 9
Helicopters
AS 350 B3  France utility helicopter 2
Eurocopter AS 532 Cougar  France transport 2
Aérospatiale SA 315 Lama  France utility helicopter SA 315B 2 one was suffered an accident months ago, 4 people died at least
Bell UH-1 Iroquois  United States utility helicopter UH-1H 12
Bell UH-1 Iroquois  United States utility helicopter UH-1H 15
Bell 212 Twin Huey  United States utility helicopter 14
Transports
Basler BT-67  United States transport 1 An upgraded turboprop powered DC-3
Beechcraft Baron  United States Utility 55 2
Beechcraft Bonanza  United States utility V35 2
Beechcraft King Air  United States staff transport Super King Air 200 4
BAE Systems 146  United Kingdom transport 146–100 4
CASA C-212 Aviocar  Spain transport 3
Cessna 152  United States utility 10
Cessna 172 Skyhawk  United States utility 172K 2
Cessna 185 Skywagon  United States utility 2
Cessna 206 Stationair  United States utility 11
Cessna 210 Centurion  United States utility 4
Cessna 310  United States utility 1
Cessna 402  United States utility 402B 1
Cessna 421 Golden Eagle  United States utility 421B 1
Convair 580  United States transport 2
Fokker F27 Friendship  Netherlands transport F27-400M 4
Learjet 25  United States VIP transport 25B
25D 		1
1
Lockheed C-130 Hercules  United States transport C-130A
C-130B
C-130H 		2
4
1
McDonnell Douglas DC-10  United States transport DC-10-10F /DC-10-30F 2 acquired in late 2007[2]
Piper PA-34 Seneca  United States utility 2
Rockwell Sabreliner  United States VIP transport Sabreliner 60 1

References

  1. ^ Aerospace Sourcebook. Aviation Week & Space Technology 2009, 26 JAN 2009 240. Web. 14 Aug 2009.
  2. ^ Bolivian military aviation OrBat

Administrative divisions section

The sentence beginning 'Original indigenous government' needs reworking slightly - perhaps along the lines of 'vested in the local (geographical-administrative units).' Jackiespeel (talk) 10:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:38, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to editors who delete paragraphs from the page - discuss first, don't delete

Personally, I have added some info to the bolivia page. If you disagree with my previous edits- we can talk it out. Seems obvious but needed to be said given today's incident - don't delete enormous amounts of info on this page either recklessly or deliberately with political intent, but discuss here first.

Considering this is indeed a political topic, I would expect there will be no shortage of people wanting to delete certain info and use partisan and questionable reasoning. Examples in the past day, was disputes on Ethical Hacking and David Rosnick. Ie. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985021134 and https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985023721

Of course, edit warring is not okay. Hence if you want to delete such info about Ethical Hacking or David Rosnick, take it to here and make your arguments here and show your proof. And if anyone deletes large amounts of info prematurely using flawed reasoning or no reasoning, do expect an editor to nudge you to give your reasoning on the talk page and to discuss it out first. Cheers from down under. 49.180.129.245 (talk) 09:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bolivia&oldid=985146378"