Talk:Gab (social network): Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Gab (social network)/Archive 11) (bot Tag: Replaced |
No edit summary |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:It may not be there, we do link to him though.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 18:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC) |
:It may not be there, we do link to him though.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 18:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
:General practice is to only link to a Wikipedia article once in the body. Alex Jones ''is'' linked in the '''2016 - 2018''' section. — <b>[[User:HandThatFeeds|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:DarkBlue;cursor:help">The Hand That Feeds You</span>]]:<sup>[[User talk:HandThatFeeds|Bite]]</sup></b> 18:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC) |
:General practice is to only link to a Wikipedia article once in the body. Alex Jones ''is'' linked in the '''2016 - 2018''' section. — <b>[[User:HandThatFeeds|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:DarkBlue;cursor:help">The Hand That Feeds You</span>]]:<sup>[[User talk:HandThatFeeds|Bite]]</sup></b> 18:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Opening paragraph is blatantly incorrect == |
|||
It ends with the sentence ′Researchers have written that Gab is "known to be hateful".[27]′, however the phrase does not occur in the reference, do a search and see for yourself.. |
|||
I'd fix it myself, but you know...I'm not allowed to correct it myself. |
Revision as of 08:27, 26 October 2020
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gab (social network) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 10 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Gab (social network). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Gab (social network) at the Reference desk. |
Do not feed the trolls! This article or its talk page has experienced trolling. The subject may be controversial or otherwise objectionable, but it is important to keep discussion on a high level. Do not get bogged down in endless debates that don't lead anywhere. Know when to deny recognition and refer to WP:PSCI, WP:FALSEBALANCE, WP:WIKIVOICE, or relevant notice-boards. Legal threats and trolling are never allowed! |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting. |
There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article, in a manner that does not comply with Wikipedia's policies. Editors are encouraged to use neutral mechanisms for requesting outside input (e.g. a "request for comment", a third opinion or other noticeboard post, or neutral criteria: "pinging all editors who have edited this page in the last 48 hours"). If someone has asked you to provide your opinion here, examine the arguments, not the editors who have made them. Reminder: disputes are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote. |
Freedom of speech | |||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Alex Jones Hot Link Missing?
Reading the body of the Artile listing prominent personalities using the site, I note that for example Ann Coulter's name is linked to her Wikipedia page, but Alex Jones' name is not. Is this oversight? If intentional, could someone please explain why? 2605:6000:6FC0:25:70F7:DBF:A3F2:E86D (talk) 18:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- It may not be there, we do link to him though.Slatersteven (talk) 18:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- General practice is to only link to a Wikipedia article once in the body. Alex Jones is linked in the 2016 - 2018 section. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 18:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Opening paragraph is blatantly incorrect
It ends with the sentence ′Researchers have written that Gab is "known to be hateful".[27]′, however the phrase does not occur in the reference, do a search and see for yourself..
I'd fix it myself, but you know...I'm not allowed to correct it myself.
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Unassessed Freedom of speech articles
- Unknown-importance Freedom of speech articles
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- Low-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Alternative views articles
- Low-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Low-importance
- All Software articles
- C-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- All Websites articles
- C-Class Free and open-source software articles
- Mid-importance Free and open-source software articles
- C-Class Free and open-source software articles of Mid-importance
- All Free and open-source software articles
- All Computing articles