Talk:Louder Now: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:10, 6 January 2007

Albums Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Name

I wrote that the name came from the song "What's it Feel Like to Be a Ghost?" because, y'know, there are lyrics in there saying "Louder now, Louder now." Someone changed it. Was I wrong?

On "7th Avenue Drop", a FUSE show where bands play songs from their new records before they are released, the band confirms that "Louder Now" came from "What's It Feel Like to be a Ghost?".

In their previous album there is a lyric "So Scream louder now..." I thought that's where it came from.

Well except for no that is not where it came from. I've seen the show. 67.142.130.17 04:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kerrang! Review

There is a ^{[citation needed]} template on the Kerrang! review of 5/5, yet in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums page it states:

The third bit is preferably a link to the actual review on an official page; it may also be a summary of the review located elsewhere (if the original publisher doesn't include it online). If there are no online sources, you may include no link at all.

And judging as the review was in a magazine, I do not think you will find an online link. So unless someone find an online link, I will remove the ^{[citation needed]} template.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Well except for no that is not where it came from. I've seen the show. [[User:67.142.130.17|67.142.130.17]] 04:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
+== Kerrang! Review ==
+There is a {{fact}} template on the Kerrang! review of 5/5, yet in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums]] page it states:
+<blockquote>
+The third bit is preferably a link to the actual review on an official page; it may also be a summary of the review located elsewhere (if the original publisher doesn't include it online). If there are no online sources, you may include no link at all.
+</blockquote>
+And judging as the review was in a magazine, I do not think you will find an online link. So unless someone find an online link, I will remove the {{fact}} template.