Jump to content

Comparison of anti-plagiarism software: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rm entry without article
Tag: Reverted
Line 45: Line 45:
| 2004
| 2004
| 2017
| 2017
| [[Proprietary software|proprietary]]
| [[Software as a service|SaaS]]
| Latin
|
|-
! [[Plagramme]]
| Lingua Intellegens
| 2018
| 2018
| [[Proprietary software|proprietary]]
| [[Proprietary software|proprietary]]
| [[Software as a service|SaaS]]
| [[Software as a service|SaaS]]

Revision as of 07:56, 25 November 2020

The following tables compare software used for plagiarism detection.

General

Software Developer First public release Latest stable version License Deployment options Scripts supported Notes
Copyscape Indigo Stream Technologies, Ltd. 2004 freemium[1] SaaS Latin Targeted at website managers.[2]
Grammarly Grammarly, Inc. 2016 freemium SaaS Latin Checks against ProQuest databases and (public) web pages.[3]
HelioBLAST Virginia Bioinformatics Institute ? (free of charge web service) Latin Submissions are limited to 1,000 words. Checking against abstract and titles in Medline/PubMed.[4]
iThenticate iParadigms 2004 2017 proprietary SaaS Latin
Plagramme Lingua Intellegens 2018 2018 proprietary SaaS Latin
PlagScan PlagScan GmbH 2008 limited SaaS, On-Premises[5] Latin, Cyrillic & Arabic[6][7] Submissions are checked against (public) online documents, a (private) shared repository, and the user's own (private) repository.[8]
PlagTracker Devellar 2011 freemium SaaS Latin, Cyrillic Rated as "Useless for academic purposes" by Plagiats Portal[9]
Turnitin iParadigms 1997 proprietary SaaS Latin & multiple scripts through translation [10] Automatically stores uploaded texts (submitted for checking) in its own database.[11]
Unicheck Unicheck 2014 SaaS proprietary SaaS Latin, Cyrillic Pricing "per page" based on 137.5 words per nominal page.[12]

References