Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Martin (cricketer): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:36, 27 November 2020

Christopher Martin (cricketer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of subject receiving significant coverage in reliable sources; fails WP:GNG. Hack (talk) 07:08, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:20, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment a little information on him here. (Still not enough coverage, but might be a helpful start for anyone possibly looking for more.) Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 08:34, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - are we here again? Why not just delete every article I created? Not having heard of someone isn't a reason to delete an article. To be honest I'd rather see all minor counties' cricketers deleted if we're going to come here again. Every article I've ever written runs to exactly the same template, and none of them have been updated in the last eleven years. Delete them all. Bobo . 10:14, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge to List of Shropshire County Cricket Club players, which would have to be created. Playing one solitary List A game does not make a cricketer notable, especially when that appearance was for a minor county and their contribution was so insignificant. Seemingly nothing spectacular about any of their other minor counties appearances either. As such, it seems highly unlikely that there is enough substantial coverage to be found to warrant a standalone article. Fails all guidelines except NCRIC/CRIN, which does not enjoy community support (per recent discussions at NSPORT and elsewhere). _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 14:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:BASIC in that there is seemingly no in-depth coverage available Spiderone 14:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Forgive the double comment - once again this is not alone in being the only article which needs to be discussed if so. Why and how do people randomly come across these articles after 11 years? Still makes me suspicious. If this article needs looking at then still do - presumably, given the size of the category - dozens of others. Anyone prepared to do the legwork in improving the articles or checking them out? *tumbleweed* Bobo . 15:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Delete''' or merge to [[List of Shropshire County Cricket Club players]], which would have to be created. Playing one solitary List A game does not make a cricketer notable, especially when that appearance was for a minor county and their contribution was so insignificant. Seemingly nothing spectacular about any of their other minor counties appearances either. As such, it seems highly unlikely that there is enough substantial coverage to be found to warrant a standalone article. Fails all guidelines except NCRIC/CRIN, which does not enjoy community support (per [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)/Archive 37#Recent English FC cricketers fail WP:GNG / WP:BIO|recent discussions at NSPORT]] and elsewhere). <sub>[[User:Wjemather|<span style="color:#0D5218">wjemather</span>]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Wjemather|<span style="color:#520D0D">please leave a message...</span>]]</sup> 14:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' - does not meet [[WP:BASIC]] in that there is seemingly no in-depth coverage available [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]] 14:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' - Forgive the double comment - once again this is not alone in being the only article which needs to be discussed if so. Why and how do people randomly come across  these articles after 11 years? Still makes me suspicious. If this article needs looking at then still do  - presumably, given the size of the category - dozens of others. Anyone prepared to do the legwork in improving the articles or checking them out? *tumbleweed* [[User:Bobo192|Bobo]][[User talk:Bobo192|.]] 15:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)