User talk:109.249.185.105

Marriage of the Virgin (Campin)

I get where you are coming from, but can we let this one slide. Your revert also includes changes I made, and as its a new article by an other new editor, lets not marr their expeirence. Later. Ceoil (talk) 11:59, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

I’ve not reverted any of your edits, only the edit https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Marriage_of_the_Virgin_(Campin)&diff=990987884&oldid=990770030, which is by a sock. Have a look at the sock edit and my reversion and you’ll see. If you really, really want to revert again, I promise not to intervene again, but it sends the wrong message to the sock if people defend them. 109.249.185.105 (talk) 12:39, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Ya, ok. But where do we go from here. Franky the article was not very well written to begin with, Campin is one of my favourite painters and one way or the other, I'm going to put those changes back. For the love of Jesus can you let this one instance slide. Note, we are both on 3RR at this stage and each liable tobe blocked shortly....I wont tell anybody if you don't. Also, I won't want to go to page protection, as you seem to be acting in good faith, and it would be cheap. But please! Can we keep these specific edits! Ceoil (talk) 12:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

The problem is that many of the edits are not good (adding spaces and line breaks is something this sock has been doing for some time). I’ve already said that I will not intervene on that page again, so if you want to just revert the bad and the passable, I’ll leave it to you. 109.249.185.105 (talk) 13:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)