User talk:Baileymlr/Climate ethics: Difference between revisions
peer review by morgan stockmeyer |
peer review |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Overall, I thought you did a nice job introducing your topic and explaining climate ethics. Your bibliography looks good and I was able to access all of the links. One suggestion that I have is doing a grammar and sentence structure check. Your intro sentence is a little long and could be rearranged and reworded to make it easier to read. I liked how you mentioned an alternative viewpoint on climate being a humanitarian issue and it did not sound biased. [[User:Morgans02|Morgans02]] ([[User talk:Morgans02|talk]]) 15:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC) |
Overall, I thought you did a nice job introducing your topic and explaining climate ethics. Your bibliography looks good and I was able to access all of the links. One suggestion that I have is doing a grammar and sentence structure check. Your intro sentence is a little long and could be rearranged and reworded to make it easier to read. I liked how you mentioned an alternative viewpoint on climate being a humanitarian issue and it did not sound biased. [[User:Morgans02|Morgans02]] ([[User talk:Morgans02|talk]]) 15:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
You did an excellent job describing climate ethics, I can tell you know the information you are talking about. The entire article offered, for the most part, an unbiased viewpoint on climate ethics. All your links worked when I tried them, and they all look relevant and recent. The only suggestion I would make would be that at times there is just a lot of information. It would be nice to see it either summed up or trimmed down a little, only because at times the sentence just carries on. [[User:Maxmcq11|Maxmcq11]] ([[User talk:Maxmcq11|talk]]) 17:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:15, 3 December 2020
Overall, I thought you did a nice job introducing your topic and explaining climate ethics. Your bibliography looks good and I was able to access all of the links. One suggestion that I have is doing a grammar and sentence structure check. Your intro sentence is a little long and could be rearranged and reworded to make it easier to read. I liked how you mentioned an alternative viewpoint on climate being a humanitarian issue and it did not sound biased. Morgans02 (talk) 15:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
You did an excellent job describing climate ethics, I can tell you know the information you are talking about. The entire article offered, for the most part, an unbiased viewpoint on climate ethics. All your links worked when I tried them, and they all look relevant and recent. The only suggestion I would make would be that at times there is just a lot of information. It would be nice to see it either summed up or trimmed down a little, only because at times the sentence just carries on. Maxmcq11 (talk) 17:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)