User talk:LocalContributor281: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:05, 4 December 2020

Note About Removing Messages

Hello. I noticed that a user, Something I feel regret for, was trying to defend me, but an admin, Ponyo, removed the message and blocked him indefinitely. Please do NOT remove any messages from my page unless I have expressed full permission. Thank you. LocalContributor281 (talk) 02:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, LocalContributor281! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify I noticed you've been around regularly about a month or so but never received a proper welcome. Despite our current dispute I am always happy to help and if you need any help anywhere (especially with TV articles) I'm always around. I know my way around MOS:TV and WP:TV quite well and have created numerous TV series articles, season articles, and episode articles and have edited many so that's definitely my area of expertise. If I can't help you answer your question I'm also sure I could point you to someone who can. I'm never trying to make an enemy here so please know I never said anything in bad faith. Anyways, I hope some of the above links help, thanks!

TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. You're not getting me angry about anything. But hey, we have different opinions, maybe at some point, we can talk a deal. LocalContributor281 (talk) 08:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've seen a LOT of television articles that go based on what I'm trying to project. I have no idea if those articles would be incorrect in a state of fashion, but forgive me for trying to say that's the normal way. LocalContributor281 (talk) 08:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really what I've always gone by is whether or not the actor received main billing. If the actor in question was just like Dudek but was on a different show and credited as "guest starring" instead of "starring" than I would say not to include them with the main cast and in the infobox. But, if the actor was credited as starring I believe they deserve credit even if it only was for one episode. Is it possible that in articles you speak of that do this are the actors credited as guest stars? TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen that in some cases. For example, (I'm using this show, because I like it a lot), DuckTales 1987, Tony Anselmo was credited as main cast several times, including in the pilot episode. Even though he appeared in 8 of the 100 episodes, they still have him in the infobox, just at the bottom with the indication that he was only in Season 1. In addition to that, several other show infoboxes on Wikipedia use the same strategy. Do you think it would be reasonable to at least have her either above or below Nelson with the indication that she only appeared in Season 1? Let me know if that sounds good, or if you have something else in mind. LocalContributor281 (talk) 07:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Just... why?

@Sro23, are you seriously blocking me because I exposed you and your wrongdoings? If so, then this is bluntly pathetic. LocalContributor281 (talk) 08:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I swear to god, you are connected with all the other fascists on Wikipedia. It's like a damn cult to put it in short. Complaints are being sent about you all, and it's pissing me off. Cut the BS and be kind to others rather than spreading lies and making things up. I'm getting sick of having to deal with this crap, and clearly, it's not just me who's complaining about this. This has gone too far and obviously, nothing is being done about it. You people choose to use your power to abuse others and make things up just so that you can get your way. If that's the case, why the hell is Wikipedia an open-source and free website? Fact of the matter is, change your ways, because now, all hell is breaking loose and it's because of you guys. LocalContributor281 (talk) 12:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another complaint that even I have to give out is whenever you make a hell of a number of unnecessary edits and a user makes ONE single revert, you threaten them with a ban. But when the tables are turned, you all play retarded and act like you don't know what they're talking about. So this shows that you can dish it out, but you can't take it when it comes back to you. LocalContributor281 (talk) 12:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response from the complaint department

Hello. Regarding this query, here's the deal. I offer you this as evidence, where you and your friend offer no evidence. I know you can't view that revision, but you're welcome to ask any administrator whether reality matches your statement. And his other complaint, also nonsense. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 09:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just him, several other people are giving out complaints and it seems that they are pretty accurate. Your reasoning, not so much. LocalContributor281 (talk) 12:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you're wrong. Go on then, be specific, provide some evidence, and stop hand-waving. You should also stop thinking everything you read on the Internet is accurate. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:50, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SIGH I'm not dealing with this again. Users have provided EVIDENCE that appears to be factual and that make sense. Also, the people who sent complaints about you, other people replied saying that they can relate to his problems because apparently, you have been doing the same thing. I'm not going to waste my time explaining any further. Just look here and that should explain. LocalContributor281 (talk) 12:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Facts too much for you? If that's the best you can do, there's clearly no substance to your complaint. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, CLEARLY, you should stop being biased. I have looked at the history and everything that they're complaining about is true. You can't hide facts, because then guilt will just come back and bite you real hard. LocalContributor281 (talk) 13:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So, let's be clear, you were obviously wrong in your original complaint, and provide no evidence of anything else. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See what I mean? You can dish out and chew me out about something that is completely laughable, but when I call you out, you pretend like you don't know what you did. I'm not stupid and neither is anyone else. You need to stop. LocalContributor281 (talk) 13:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to respond to any complaint you make, with evidence and detailed rationales. Your original complaint has been rubbished, and now you're just hand-waving. If there's ever anything specific you want to complain about, anything you want to call me out on, just let me know. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I gave you evidence. That's my REASONING for even calling you out. Now you're calling everybody else wrong. Maybe something's WRONG with you. LocalContributor281 (talk) 13:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've provided no evidence, and the only thing you've been specific about (the original complaint) is false. When you're willing to be specific, give me a shout. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

God damn it, I can't stand you and your stuck-up behavior. If you have a problem and you want to call their complaints false, here's a bright idea, "ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING REASONABLE AND TALK TO THEM". In addition, they are calling your replies "snide". Talk to the guy, Conner, if you want to take your anger out on him. Don't do it to me, because I swear, I'm going to wind up saying something out of order and you'll be complaining that I'm being "mean" to you. LocalContributor281 (talk) 13:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An Apology

Sorry for those last few comments. I may not have made this aware, but I can become really short-tempered when something angers me. Including the fact that I was diagnosed with Autism 5 years ago. I know that most of you won't take that for a reasonable excuse, but I have noticed that my anger only goes downhill. I'm currently taking private classes so that I can get this problem under control and I think it's working, quite slowly. My main apologies would go out to TheDoctorWho, whom we've settled our disputes with a nice conversation, Peteforsyth, whom I used to refer to. I did make a horrific wish stating that I'd wait for the day that he died, but I am terribly sorry for ever saying that. Also, Toughpigs, even though we don't really agree, that doesn't mean that I need to necessarily hate her. So hopefully this note will show you that who I presented out really isn't who I am. If you still find this to be a little far-fetched, then understandably so. However, I can assure you all that I'm better than that and am generally a caring and nice guy. LocalContributor281 (talk) 12:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, if you're still wondering why I used alt accounts that got taken down, it was because my original account was Shaddai Wright. I only used FTVA Official, because I forgot my password for the former account. In addition, nobody mentioned to me any policies linking towards why I got blocked. After both accounts got banned, I used FTVA, because I couldn't find any contacts that I could appeal to, because both my accounts got their talk page access removed. This was done by Kinu, Wugapodes, and Peteforsyth, who accused me of promoting, which I wasn't. On almost any platform I'm on, I tend to use that username. Also the only reason why I used "official" is because there have been people impersonating me in the past and there was nothing that I could do about it. It's still an issue and I got reported on some platforms because of their malicious intentions. LocalContributor281 (talk) 13:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Daisy Duck.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Daisy Duck.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Donald F. Duck.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Donald F. Duck.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I Call a Meeting

I'm trying to get in touch with some admins, such as Sro23 and Zzuuzz, but clearly, I'm being ignored and they refuse to discuss anything. Please respond below ASAP. LocalContributor281 (talk) 03:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
 Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 18:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
+== I Call a Meeting ==
+I'm trying to get in touch with some admins, such as [[User:Sro23|Sro23]] and [[User:Zzuuzz|Zzuuzz]], but clearly, I'm being ignored and they refuse to discuss anything.  Please respond below ASAP. [[User:LocalContributor281|LocalContributor281]] ([[User talk:LocalContributor281#top|talk]]) 03:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)