User talk:Kukini: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:56, 8 January 2007

edit count | edit summary usage

Talk

The box below was created by User:Sango123.

Current discussion

My admin logs:
• blocks • deletions • moves • protects • uploads •

I will likely revert any attacks made on this page as well as any unsigned comments [1].

Aset

sorry! i just presumed there was a reference to it on the Isis page as Aset is used on other pages, eg Aset Ka, and that other Aset terms redirect to the appropriate page. Heru-sa-Aset redirects to Horus for instance. Coda littleking 17:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen and edited many pages with a top disambig link instead of a whole page. I presumed that you would only use a disambig page if there was three or more entries that someone might be looking for. In fact I just looked up the page on disambiguation and it is standard to do so, even though i appear to have not used the correct template.Coda littleking 20:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

chaparral page

why, may i ask, do you continually edit the chaparral high school page? what knowledge do you have of the school? (unsigned comments by User:68.231.87.34)

changes

what you determine to be porn sites, i do not know. in addition, there have be no personal attacks made on this wiki entry, only truth, which can be confirmed if you only give me the chance to find the citations. please, refrain from deleting an entry until you have given the poster proper time to find a citation. or, better yet, instead of deleting a new member's changes, message him and suggest how he might better post...thank you for your concern. (unsigned comments by User:68.231.87.34)

changes

sorry about forgetting to sign, my bad. if you look at who made the changes you just referenced, it was not i. i would ask you not to delete changes made that do not reference porn cites or make personal attacks. again, thank you so much for your concern. 68.231.87.34 18:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:70.246.18.216's comments

look read what i removed before tagging me. obviously i had a good reason for it as the part i removed talked bout sound clipping, which had nothing to do with the article. read my comments for the rick rubin section discussion.--70.246.18.216 06:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok thats my bad. i apologize. now will u change back the article as i had it? --70.246.18.216 06:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page

I've responded to the posts by subwayguy on his talk page - so deletion should not be seen as hostile? And as per the link you've referred me to (under the Etiquette section), this now means I am free to remove his posts, without insult. I have done three major articles in the past, discussed them, and removed old posts. In any case, thank you for the advice. --Kelly Kohnen 06:33, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you prefer I pull old, deleted comments back on the page before archiving then?--Kelly Kohnen 06:43, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've begun creating an archive page... seems better practice than to have people refer to deletion history. I've taken no offence, and appreciate your desire to maintain organization among the many users. Happy holidays! --Kelly Kohnen 06:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editorial of my recent submission

Hi Kukini. I am new to the world of contributing to Wikipedia and don't [yet] understand all the protocol nor means involved. You cited my Spiritual house entry as lacking appropriate references and/or citations. My thought when I submitted such was that the article itself links to sufficient references within Wikipedia. However, I now realize that existing references may not be sufficient. Could you offer me suggestions as to how to bring Spiritual house up to par? If it matters to you and/or facilitates such improvement, I've found that Crossway Bibles of Good News Publishers in Wheaton, IL, who publish the English Standard Version, post the verses I referred to in the page under probation at http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?q=1+Peter+2%3A5 and http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?q=1+Cor+3%3A9.

Thank you for you time any help,

Ben Winsor

Benwinsor 07:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Request for Adminship

Kukini

Thanks for your support on my successful Request for Adminship (final result 78 Support /0 Oppose / 1 Neutral) I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months. I am humbled by your kind support and would certainly welcome any feedback on my actions. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Once again, many thanks and happy new year! All the best, Asterion^talk 15:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Fosnez

Hi, you recently added a warning to my talkpage. Unfortunatly in the process you removed some of the comments on my talkpage. I am fully aware that I am to leave comments on that page. But I refuse to have it filled up with spam from that bloody Orphanbot beacuse of images I uploaded over a year ago. Fosnez 16:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings once again. Have a look at Image:Cobb & Co. coach No 48.jpg and at my talk page. This is what annoys me and why I "archive" botspam the way I do... Fairuse has been satisfied but still the bot spams me... Fosnez 18:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Users

I now that Louis23rd is a sockpuppet of Shadez. Shadez should also be deleted as he stole my account from wikipedia. Can my user talk page be deleted? please. RealShadez

I am leaving wikipedia today and making sure that the Shadez and Louis23rd names are taken away too. Please could you delete my talk page, the Shadez userpage and both pages of Louis23rd. Louis23rd is a sockpuppet account, it should be blocked as should Shadez. Once this is done I will leave. RealShadez

Yes, I would like to close the account permanently. But first can you delete the Shadez page and LOuis23rd pages and make sure they are blocked. Please at least delete the pages. RealShadez

Promise me you will look into there accounts and monitor for any obvious sockpuppeting. Please close my account. thanks RealShadez

This is the duty of every administrator. --Kukini 19:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please close my account. RealShadez

When will my account be deleted along with my talkpage? How will i now? RealShadez

'RealShadez' has contacted me by email to ask that I give myself in. Well, yes, I am Shadez and Louis23rd and I found out the password for the Shadez account. Not much of a challenge. You might as well block my account if you wish, I am a sockpuppet afterall. Delete my userpage and talk page too if that's what RealShadez wants. I won't be using this or any other account for malicious intentions and under the rights of the Right to vanish on meta. Thank you for your time in reading. Louis23rd 19:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message

I don't really get your message about my activity on Wikipedia. I pretty sure I'm free to edit, am I not? semper fi — Moe 22:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

school counseling category

That's a good idea for a category. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Whicky1978 (talk • contribs) 05:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

History of school counseling

I have added a new article, and moved "Jesse B. Davis" to that one. I have reccomended that the "category:counseling and guidance" be removed b/c "school counseling" is more appropriate.This article needs to be linked to the appropiate history categories and articles.whicky1978^talk 05:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...

Thanks, for your comment. I have a question though. By policy, do you mean what the purpose of this project is? I mean, I think I understand this seeing that I have over 3.500 edits on the Bosnian Wikipedia and I am an bureaucrat on the Bosnian Wikinews. you are one of the first to give a useful criticism. Thanks, Kukini 23:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

I'm pretty sure I've been using edit summaries, aside from a few instances of reverting obvious vandalism where I used rollback--71.247.246.54 21:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Sorry for driving you nuts, i'm just a new user. are you really able to block people?

thanks for the welcome, how long to you have to edit wikipedia to be an admin, do you work for company? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wariovvare-2007 (talk • contribs) 04:30, January 2, 2007 (UTC).

Mak82hyd comment

Its Not written in a neutral manner. it looks more like critism page then islamophopia watch page.Mak82hyd 21:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry slow computer

My computers slow i try to be fast and you already reverted the page before it was done so it was reverted twice once by you once by me.The Great White Hunter 21:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)User:MikeWinters

Noel Mewton-Wood article

Hello,

What do suppose is going on with the vandalism of the Noel Mewton-Wood article by 172.203.47.53? Do you think it should be protected for a while, or is that an over reaction?

Curious,

Michael David 01:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I'll keep it on my watchlist. Thanks. -- Michael David 01:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

67.36.63.229

Well, right now this user is adding some aesthetic changes to Street Fighter character articles. Most of them are okay. Danny Lilithborne 02:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- After me repeatedly removing Britain as a birthplace from Cammy's article, the anon stuck it in "residence". It's not part of the template so it won't show up, but it probably shouldn't be there and I don't feel like reverting *again*. ^_^ Danny Lilithborne 03:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - He's at it again. Danny Lilithborne 23:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - I've had to ask for Street Fighter II to be protected at WP:RPP because of his antics. :( Danny Lilithborne 02:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:212.30.31.19

ok i know how to warn people, now how do i ban people this guy has reached his vandislism limit. --The Great White Hunter 12:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Mike_Winters

S_Vecchiato

And thank you anyway for welcoming me (>^_^<) --S vecchiato 21:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was me. Erm... Perhaps you are talking about the edit summary ? (*^_^*) --S vecchiato 21:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are right but the comment I cut was mine, I am User:82.52.183.188, I only thought of replacing the comment in another section. Sorry--S vecchiato 21:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"I am not an expert of telecommunication and relied on Basilio Catania's work, available on the net. However, through helping for this article I discovered how many pioneers of telephone were there at the very same time. The word "telephone" was used for everybody. Look at wikipedia articles about: Emile Berliner Charles Bourseul Thomas Edison Elisha Gray Innocenzo Manzetti Philipp Reis What should the name "telephone" only be precluded to Meucci, if many scientists developed several models of telephones at the same time?--82.52.183.188 21:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

Weasel

I mentioned it in the discussion page, but I tried to highlight where the problems are by using the tag. There should no part in Wikipedia where a study is mentioned without a reference or words such as "some people say" "some people claim" and "it can be argued that"... it almost invariably leads to bias or unfounded claims. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.14.135.82 (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Rklawton

Thank you. Rklawton 22:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Starwars1955

I have no idea what you're doing on Starwars1955's talk page, but please stop. He has every right to remove stuff from his talk page. I've asked him to leave the unblock notice, which I see he's done, but he can remove anything else. Your threat to block him for removing items from his talk page is completely unwarranted. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We see this differently. I see deleting notices on a user talk page, and not archiving them as a form of vandalism. --Kukini 23:19, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, he does have the right to delete the notices; there was a recent ArbCom ruling that supported this. Removing notices or warnings is considered an acknowledgement that they've been read. See Wikipedia:Talk_pages#Etiquette, which says that reverting removals of notices is "not proper," especially for vandalism warnings. You are also at three reverts on that talk page, and if you revert again, you will be in violation of WP:3RR. I hope you haven't blocked any other users for removing notices from their talk pages, but if so, you should unblock them. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just because we're admins doesn't mean 3RR doesn't apply to us; you reverted three times, and your reverts were improper (although I understand now that you didn't know the rules on talk pages). All the user was doing was editing his own talk page, and violated no policies while doing so. There really wasn't any reason for you to give him a hard time, especially since he's in the midst of a week-long block already. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy editing to you as well, and no hard feelings. I was unaware of the ArbCom ruling myself until 2-3 weeks ago, but hey, things change quickly around here. Take care. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We seem to handle anon accounts and pages differently - besides, I don't think talk-page-protection really causes as much harm as a block, so I certainly wouldn't squawk at what you did there. | Mr. Darcy talk 00:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like we've opened up a large can of worms, but perhaps in a good way - this bot idea sounds very interesting, and if this arbcom case doesn't exist, then people need to stop referring to it at AN/I. (I do believe it exists - I may not be the brightest bulb in the chandelier, but I know what I read!) Pleasure to meet you as well! | Mr. Darcy talk

No worries

I just remembered this because I had the same issue before. I am not an admin, so it's all good. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 00:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am unblokced

its over. i can write here now72.184.201.3 02:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your congrats

Hi Kukni :-) I appreciate your congrats very much! Take care, FloNight 04:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

S_Vecchiato again

Almost all my changes of yesterday in Antonio Meucci's page were deleted!!! What happened??? I provided every quotation as possible(-_-#) --S vecchiato 09:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock

It appears to be an autoblock to a pool of aol ip address. CarmenBryan 04:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

thanks for the tip CarmenBryan 07:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it wasn't vandalsim

what you all find vandalism is mostly fact. you are not the curator of information

@@ Line 192: / Line 192: @@
 thanks for the tip  [[User:CarmenBryan|CarmenBryan]] 07:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
+== it wasn't vandalsim ==
+what you all find vandalism is mostly fact.  you are not the curator of information