User talk:Calhobbs11/Protein folding: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Peer Review - Mark Parsons |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Here is the link to my peer review: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Calhobbs11/Protein_folding/Jimmyjohnslaser_Peer_Review [[User:Jimmyjohnslaser|Jimmyjohnslaser]] ([[User talk:Jimmyjohnslaser|talk]]) 18:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC) |
:Here is the link to my peer review: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Calhobbs11/Protein_folding/Jimmyjohnslaser_Peer_Review [[User:Jimmyjohnslaser|Jimmyjohnslaser]] ([[User talk:Jimmyjohnslaser|talk]]) 18:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
Nice work! Reading the original article, I definitely agree that this is a relevant addition, since it has hardly anything on protein NMR. |
|||
You've done a great job researching the topic. I liked the intro sentence explaining NMR. It is a little bit hard for me to understand as you go into more detail, so any small tweaks to help that would be beneficial. |
|||
The flow was great. I liked that you had an intro, discussion on different techniques, disadvantages of NMR, and an example of its application. Also, nice job linking terms and integrating references. |
|||
One of the easiest sections to understand was when you talked about limitations of NMR compared to other techniques. I thought it would also be nice to talk about the benefits of NMR in comparison with other techniques, as well. Then you could even consider putting that info at the start of the section, before diving into the types of NMR etc. |
|||
It will still need a figure (like where most of ours are at right now, I think). |
|||
Nice work! This is a really interesting and relevant topic, and I think you're doing a great job on it.[[User:Vazi97|Vazi97]] ([[User talk:Vazi97|talk]]) 18:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:20, 7 December 2020
Your first review article look great. I think you will have plenty of information to adequately do the project. Jimmyjohnslaser (talk) 17:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
I like what you wrote about NMR. I am wondering what your plan is? Are you just adding that one section? If you are I think you should hyper link NMR to the Wikipedia page on Nuclear magnetic resonance. Jimmyjohnslaser (talk) 03:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Yeah I'm just going to add to the NMR section of the article because most of the rest of the article is quite good. The NMR part seems to only have a couple sentences and is used just as frequently as the other techniques. Calhobbs11 (talk) 03:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- Here is the link to my peer review: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Calhobbs11/Protein_folding/Jimmyjohnslaser_Peer_Review Jimmyjohnslaser (talk) 18:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Nice work! Reading the original article, I definitely agree that this is a relevant addition, since it has hardly anything on protein NMR.
You've done a great job researching the topic. I liked the intro sentence explaining NMR. It is a little bit hard for me to understand as you go into more detail, so any small tweaks to help that would be beneficial.
The flow was great. I liked that you had an intro, discussion on different techniques, disadvantages of NMR, and an example of its application. Also, nice job linking terms and integrating references.
One of the easiest sections to understand was when you talked about limitations of NMR compared to other techniques. I thought it would also be nice to talk about the benefits of NMR in comparison with other techniques, as well. Then you could even consider putting that info at the start of the section, before diving into the types of NMR etc.
It will still need a figure (like where most of ours are at right now, I think).
Nice work! This is a really interesting and relevant topic, and I think you're doing a great job on it.Vazi97 (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)