Talk:Uroplatus phantasticus: Difference between revisions
m Kevmin moved page Talk:Satanic leaf-tailed gecko to Talk:Uroplatus phantasticus over redirect: Controversial move, and NOT supported by the guideline referenced. |
→Article name change: new section |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
The image is photo-shopped. No such variant exists.[[Special:Contributions/2607:FEA8:879F:F270:0:0:0:4|2607:FEA8:879F:F270:0:0:0:4]] ([[User talk:2607:FEA8:879F:F270:0:0:0:4|talk]]) 01:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC) |
The image is photo-shopped. No such variant exists.[[Special:Contributions/2607:FEA8:879F:F270:0:0:0:4|2607:FEA8:879F:F270:0:0:0:4]] ([[User talk:2607:FEA8:879F:F270:0:0:0:4|talk]]) 01:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Article name change == |
|||
Kevmin has reverted this article's name to its scientific one, even though it already has a common name that is well in use. I don't find this to be a very wise decision. [[User:Ddum5347|Ddum5347]] ([[User talk:Ddum5347|talk]]) 17:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:11, 8 December 2020
Amphibians and Reptiles C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This article uses text donated by Wildscreen from their ARKive project (see below). For further information, please see Wikipedia:GLAM/ARKive. |
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Wildscreen ARKive texts. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2011090810014488. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Name
Why is it known as the Satanic Leaf Tailed Gecko? I don't see anything particularly demonic about it. Xavius, the Satyr Lord (talk) 10:29, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately the picture on there is a very bad one. It's called 'satanic' because when upset, surprised, or otherwise emotionally distressed, it turned almost jet black and has bright red eyes. Try googling the name, but even those results don't do it justice. 67.249.178.169 (talk) 22:30, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
IUCN Category
This species is not included in any of the categories of the IUCN Red List. Only one species of genus Uroplatus (U. henkeli) is included in the category vulnerable (http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/178653/0) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.91.68.237 (talk) 12:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Order
I wonder if anybody with more expertise than me could clarify what order this gecko is in? There seems to be a conflict between information on the ARKive website ARKive.org and the Wikipedia page that could do with clarifying. Cheers Wikisamia (talk) 20:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
variant with wings?
On 2016-01-27, the Uroplatus phantasticus was featured in the Bing wallpaper of the day. A Bing search reveals this picture, in which one of the two appears to have wings. Through some searching, I haven't found any more information on that. Any ideas? - Paul2520 (talk) 16:22, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Variant With Wings
The image is photo-shopped. No such variant exists.2607:FEA8:879F:F270:0:0:0:4 (talk) 01:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Article name change
Kevmin has reverted this article's name to its scientific one, even though it already has a common name that is well in use. I don't find this to be a very wise decision. Ddum5347 (talk) 17:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)