User talk:Swil999: Difference between revisions
→December 2020: Removing Warning |
→Your thread has been archived: new section |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:Sergeant Bill]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> |
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:Sergeant Bill]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> |
||
== Your thread has been archived == |
|||
{| style="margin: 1em 4em;" |
|||
|- valign="top" |
|||
| [[File:WP teahouse logo 2.png|alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0]] |
|||
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> |
|||
Hi '''Swil999'''! The thread you created at the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse]], {{tq|Is there a reason Infobox Officeholder should be used over Infobox Judge?}}, has been [[WP:ARCHIVE|archived]] because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1087#Is_there_a_reason_Infobox_Officeholder_should_be_used_over_Infobox_Judge?|here]]. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1087#Is_there_a_reason_Infobox_Officeholder_should_be_used_over_Infobox_Judge?|Is there a reason Infobox Officeholder should be used over Infobox Judge?]]}}. |
|||
<small>The archival was done by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both [[WP:BOT|automated accounts]]. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. [[User:Muninnbot|Muninnbot]] ([[User talk:Muninnbot|talk]]) 19:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)</small> |
|||
<div><small></small></div> |
|||
</div> |
|||
|}<!-- User:Muninnbot/Teahouse_archival_notification --> |
Revision as of 19:01, 13 December 2020
Welcome!
Hello, Swil999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Talk:Mark Dice. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! valereee (talk) 12:59, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
A bowl of strawberries for you!
Thanks for your edits on Homer Tien. Spyder212 (talk) 03:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC) |
Move reverted.
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your bold move of Barack Obama Supreme Court candidates has been reverted because an editor has found it to be controversial. Per Wikipedia:Requested moves, a move request must be placed on the article's talk page, and the request be open for discussion for seven days, "if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested". If you believe that this move is appropriate, please initiate such a discussion to form the appropriate consensus. Again, please note that moving a page with a longstanding title and/or a large number of incoming links is more likely to be considered controversial, and may be contested. Note that such consensus is particularly required before moving a title with incoming links in order to create a disambiguation page at that title. BD2412 T 19:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Falun Gong. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 19:39, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sergeant Bill, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your thread has been archived
Hi Swil999! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|