Jump to content

1931 Polish census: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DumSS (talk | contribs)
Monkbot (talk | contribs)
m Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 14 templates: del empty params (2×); hyphenate params (12×);
Line 49: Line 49:
# Non-believers: {{in5|18}} 6,058
# Non-believers: {{in5|18}} 6,058
# Not Declared: {{in5|17}} 39,663
# Not Declared: {{in5|17}} 39,663
:<ref name="Polish Census 1931">{{cite web|url=http://statlibr.stat.gov.pl/exlibris/aleph/a18_1/apache_media/VUNVGMLANSCQQFGYHCN3VDLK12A9U5.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140317212240/http://statlibr.stat.gov.pl/exlibris/aleph/a18_1/apache_media/VUNVGMLANSCQQFGYHCN3VDLK12A9U5.pdf|archivedate=2014-03-17|title=Główny Urząd Statystyczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, drugi powszechny spis ludności z dn. 9.XII 1931 r. - Mieszkania i gospodarstwa domowe ludność|trans-title=Central Statistical Office the Polish Republic, the second census dated 9.XII 1931 - Abodes and household populace|language=pl|publisher=Central Statistical office of the Polish Republic|year=1938|format=PDF, direct download, table: page 30}}</ref>
:<ref name="Polish Census 1931">{{cite web|url=http://statlibr.stat.gov.pl/exlibris/aleph/a18_1/apache_media/VUNVGMLANSCQQFGYHCN3VDLK12A9U5.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140317212240/http://statlibr.stat.gov.pl/exlibris/aleph/a18_1/apache_media/VUNVGMLANSCQQFGYHCN3VDLK12A9U5.pdf|archive-date=2014-03-17|title=Główny Urząd Statystyczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, drugi powszechny spis ludności z dn. 9.XII 1931 r. - Mieszkania i gospodarstwa domowe ludność|trans-title=Central Statistical Office the Polish Republic, the second census dated 9.XII 1931 - Abodes and household populace|language=pl|publisher=Central Statistical office of the Polish Republic|year=1938|format=PDF, direct download, table: page 30}}</ref>
|}
|}
The number of Polish native speakers relative to the total number of Roman Catholics may be overestimated, and possibly closer 17-18 millions.{{fact|date=February 2020}}
The number of Polish native speakers relative to the total number of Roman Catholics may be overestimated, and possibly closer 17-18 millions.{{fact|date=February 2020}}
Line 87: Line 87:
== Mother tongue controversy ==
== Mother tongue controversy ==
{{POV section|date=October 2015}}
{{POV section|date=October 2015}}
The census used the concept of [[mother tongue]] and [[religion]] to classify the respondents, rather than [[nationality]]. [[Polish census of 1921|The 1921 census]] had included a nationality question which was replaced in the 1931 census by the "mother tongue" question; this change was protested by Ukrainians and Jews{{Dubious |1921 census Jews with Polish national identity vs. 1931 census Jews with Polish mother tongue |reason=in the census of 1921 a higher percent of Jews - over 25% - declared Polish nationality, than that which declared Polish mother tongue - almost 12% - in 1931. Considering that even many Jews whose mother tongue was Non-Polish considered themselves to be Poles by nationality in 1921, I see no reason why would they protest the replacement of "nationality" question by "mother tongue" question - unless the reason was that Yiddish-speaking Jews who considered their nationality to be Polish could not declare Polish mother tongue? See also the talk page and references to Ezra Mendelsohn's book. |date=March 2016}} among others, many of whom were [[Multilingualism|bilingual or trilingual]].<ref name="Stopnicka">{{cite book|author=Celia Stopnicka Heller|authorlink=Celia Stopnicka Heller|title=On the Edge of Destruction: Jews of Poland Between the Two World Wars|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GmVt-O3AR34C&pg=PA68|accessdate=17 October 2015|year=1993|publisher=Wayne State University Press|isbn=0-8143-2494-0|page=68}}</ref> Moreover, many Jews by religion - almost 12% - considered Polish to be their mother tongue in 1931.<ref name="Marcus">{{cite book|author=Joseph Marcus|title=Social and Political History of the Jews in Poland, 1919-1939|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=82ncGA4GuN4C&pg=PA17|accessdate=17 October 2015|year=1983|publisher=Walter de Gruyter|isbn=978-90-279-3239-6|page=17}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=5_OXOwvjqjwC&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30 |first1=Ezra|last1=Mendelsohn|title=The Jews of East Central Europe Between the World Wars|publisher=Indiana University Press|year=1987| pages=30–31}}</ref> However, a higher percent of Jews by religion - over 25% - considered themselves to be [[Ethnic group|ethnically]] (or in terms of [[national identity]]) [[Poles]], according to the previous census of 1921.<ref>{{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=5_OXOwvjqjwC&pg=PA29&lpg=PA29 |first1=Ezra|last1=Mendelsohn|title=The Jews of East Central Europe Between the World Wars|publisher=Indiana University Press|year=1987| pages=29–30}}</ref> Thus the number of Jews by religion increased as a percentage of the population in the 1931 survey, relative to the numbers of Jews as an ethnicity in the 1921 Census.
The census used the concept of [[mother tongue]] and [[religion]] to classify the respondents, rather than [[nationality]]. [[Polish census of 1921|The 1921 census]] had included a nationality question which was replaced in the 1931 census by the "mother tongue" question; this change was protested by Ukrainians and Jews{{Dubious |1921 census Jews with Polish national identity vs. 1931 census Jews with Polish mother tongue |reason=in the census of 1921 a higher percent of Jews - over 25% - declared Polish nationality, than that which declared Polish mother tongue - almost 12% - in 1931. Considering that even many Jews whose mother tongue was Non-Polish considered themselves to be Poles by nationality in 1921, I see no reason why would they protest the replacement of "nationality" question by "mother tongue" question - unless the reason was that Yiddish-speaking Jews who considered their nationality to be Polish could not declare Polish mother tongue? See also the talk page and references to Ezra Mendelsohn's book. |date=March 2016}} among others, many of whom were [[Multilingualism|bilingual or trilingual]].<ref name="Stopnicka">{{cite book|author=Celia Stopnicka Heller|author-link=Celia Stopnicka Heller|title=On the Edge of Destruction: Jews of Poland Between the Two World Wars|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GmVt-O3AR34C&pg=PA68|access-date=17 October 2015|year=1993|publisher=Wayne State University Press|isbn=0-8143-2494-0|page=68}}</ref> Moreover, many Jews by religion - almost 12% - considered Polish to be their mother tongue in 1931.<ref name="Marcus">{{cite book|author=Joseph Marcus|title=Social and Political History of the Jews in Poland, 1919-1939|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=82ncGA4GuN4C&pg=PA17|access-date=17 October 2015|year=1983|publisher=Walter de Gruyter|isbn=978-90-279-3239-6|page=17}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=5_OXOwvjqjwC&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30 |first1=Ezra|last1=Mendelsohn|title=The Jews of East Central Europe Between the World Wars|publisher=Indiana University Press|year=1987| pages=30–31}}</ref> However, a higher percent of Jews by religion - over 25% - considered themselves to be [[Ethnic group|ethnically]] (or in terms of [[national identity]]) [[Poles]], according to the previous census of 1921.<ref>{{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=5_OXOwvjqjwC&pg=PA29&lpg=PA29 |first1=Ezra|last1=Mendelsohn|title=The Jews of East Central Europe Between the World Wars|publisher=Indiana University Press|year=1987| pages=29–30}}</ref> Thus the number of Jews by religion increased as a percentage of the population in the 1931 survey, relative to the numbers of Jews as an ethnicity in the 1921 Census.


This situation created a difficulty in establishing the true number of ethnic non-Polish citizens of Poland. Some authors used the language criterion to attempt to establish the actual number of minorities, which was difficult considering that over 707,000 people in [[Polesia]] declared that they spoke "[[Tutejszy|local]]" rather than any other language.<ref name="Fowkes">{{cite book|author=Ben Fowkes|title=Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflict in the Post-Communist World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9S4pCKm9bUEC&pg=PA73|accessdate=17 October 2015|year=2002|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=978-0-333-79256-8|page=73}}</ref> Other authors used approximation based on both language and declared religion.<ref name="Tomaszewski">{{cite book|author=[[Jerzy Tomaszewski (historian)|Jerzy Tomaszewski]]|title =Rzeczpospolita wielu narodów|year=1985|page=35|publisher=Czytelnik|location=Warsaw|language=pl}}, as cited in Piotrowski, op.cit., page 294</ref> After [[World War II]] in [[Soviet bloc]] countries the interpretation of the census was used for political purposes, to underline the officially-supported thesis that pre-war Poland incorporated areas where the non-Polish population made up the majority of inhabitants. For this purpose some authors combined all non-Polish speakers in South-Eastern Poland (namely [[Ukrainians]], [[Belarusians]], [[Rusyns]], [[Hutsuls]], [[Lemkos]], [[Boyko]]s and [[Poleszuk]]s) into one category of "[[Ruthenians]]").<ref name="Zielinski">{{cite book|author=Henryk Zieliński|title=Historia Polski 1914-1939|year=1983|pages= |publisher=[[Ossolineum]]|location=Wrocław|isbn= |language=pl}}</ref> In fact, the census had counted speakers of Belarusian, Ukrainian, Russian, and Ruthenian languages as separate categories<ref name="Pol Census 1931">(Polish) Główny Urząd Statystyczny (corporate author) (1932) "Ludnosc, Ludnosc wedlug wyznania i plci oraz jezyka ojczystego" (table 10, pg. 15)</ref>
This situation created a difficulty in establishing the true number of ethnic non-Polish citizens of Poland. Some authors used the language criterion to attempt to establish the actual number of minorities, which was difficult considering that over 707,000 people in [[Polesia]] declared that they spoke "[[Tutejszy|local]]" rather than any other language.<ref name="Fowkes">{{cite book|author=Ben Fowkes|title=Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflict in the Post-Communist World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9S4pCKm9bUEC&pg=PA73|access-date=17 October 2015|year=2002|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=978-0-333-79256-8|page=73}}</ref> Other authors used approximation based on both language and declared religion.<ref name="Tomaszewski">{{cite book|author=[[Jerzy Tomaszewski (historian)|Jerzy Tomaszewski]]|title =Rzeczpospolita wielu narodów|year=1985|page=35|publisher=Czytelnik|location=Warsaw|language=pl}}, as cited in Piotrowski, op.cit., page 294</ref> After [[World War II]] in [[Soviet bloc]] countries the interpretation of the census was used for political purposes, to underline the officially-supported thesis that pre-war Poland incorporated areas where the non-Polish population made up the majority of inhabitants. For this purpose some authors combined all non-Polish speakers in South-Eastern Poland (namely [[Ukrainians]], [[Belarusians]], [[Rusyns]], [[Hutsuls]], [[Lemkos]], [[Boyko]]s and [[Poleszuk]]s) into one category of "[[Ruthenians]]").<ref name="Zielinski">{{cite book|author=Henryk Zieliński|title=Historia Polski 1914-1939|year=1983|publisher=[[Ossolineum]]|location=Wrocław|language=pl}}</ref> In fact, the census had counted speakers of Belarusian, Ukrainian, Russian, and Ruthenian languages as separate categories<ref name="Pol Census 1931">(Polish) Główny Urząd Statystyczny (corporate author) (1932) "Ludnosc, Ludnosc wedlug wyznania i plci oraz jezyka ojczystego" (table 10, pg. 15)</ref>


Some authors contend that the change in questions asked by the census officials was due to the Polish government's wish to minimise the presence of minorities<ref name="Marcus"/><ref name="Piotrowski">{{cite book|author=Tadeusz Piotrowski|authorlink=Tadeusz Piotrowski (sociologist)|title=Poland's Holocaust: Ethnic Strife, Collaboration with Occupying Forces and Genocide in the Second Republic, 1918-1947|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hC0-dk7vpM8C&pg=PA294|accessdate=17 October 2015|year=1998|publisher=McFarland|isbn=978-0-7864-0371-4|page=294|chapter=Belorussian collaboration}}</ref><ref name="Ther">{{cite book|author1=Philipp Ther|author2=Ana Siljak|authorlink2=Ana Siljak|title=Redrawing Nations: Ethnic Cleansing in East-Central Europe, 1944-1948|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oGmTs2SceAgC&pg=PA136|accessdate=17 October 2015|year=2001|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|isbn=978-0-7425-1094-4|page=136}}</ref> and represented an attempt to maximize the effects of a decade of educational policies stressing the Polish language.<ref name="Prizel">{{cite book|author=Ilya Prizel|title=National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fE2quB852jcC&pg=PA63|accessdate=17 October 2015|year=1998|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-57697-0|page=63}}</ref> [[Tadeusz Piotrowski (sociologist)|Tadeusz Piotrowski]] called the 1931 census official but "unreliable" for determining ethnicity, saying that by using language as an indicator of ethnicity it had underestimated the number of ethnic non-Poles, and that in particular, ethnic Poles were not a majority in the
Some authors contend that the change in questions asked by the census officials was due to the Polish government's wish to minimise the presence of minorities<ref name="Marcus"/><ref name="Piotrowski">{{cite book|author=Tadeusz Piotrowski|author-link=Tadeusz Piotrowski (sociologist)|title=Poland's Holocaust: Ethnic Strife, Collaboration with Occupying Forces and Genocide in the Second Republic, 1918-1947|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hC0-dk7vpM8C&pg=PA294|access-date=17 October 2015|year=1998|publisher=McFarland|isbn=978-0-7864-0371-4|page=294|chapter=Belorussian collaboration}}</ref><ref name="Ther">{{cite book|author1=Philipp Ther|author2=Ana Siljak|author-link2=Ana Siljak|title=Redrawing Nations: Ethnic Cleansing in East-Central Europe, 1944-1948|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oGmTs2SceAgC&pg=PA136|access-date=17 October 2015|year=2001|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|isbn=978-0-7425-1094-4|page=136}}</ref> and represented an attempt to maximize the effects of a decade of educational policies stressing the Polish language.<ref name="Prizel">{{cite book|author=Ilya Prizel|title=National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fE2quB852jcC&pg=PA63|access-date=17 October 2015|year=1998|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-57697-0|page=63}}</ref> [[Tadeusz Piotrowski (sociologist)|Tadeusz Piotrowski]] called the 1931 census official but "unreliable" for determining ethnicity, saying that by using language as an indicator of ethnicity it had underestimated the number of ethnic non-Poles, and that in particular, ethnic Poles were not a majority in the
[[Nowogródek Voivodeship (1919–1939)|Nowogródek Voivodeship]] and [[Polesie Voivodeship]].<ref name="Piotrowski2">Piotrowski, op.cit., [https://archive.org/details/polandsholocaust00piot/page/143 <!-- quote=piotrowski nowogrodek majority. --> page 143]: ''[The Belarusians] were distributed as follows: Polesie, 654,000; Nowogrodek, 616,000; Wilno, 409,000; Bialystok,269,100''</ref> A 1954 study of the Polish population by the [[United States Census Bureau]] concluded that "in presenting the results, the Central Statistical office emphasized the central role played by the Polish ethnic group by increasing the number of minority groups, and thus reducing the size of a given group, shown in the results, Ukrainian and Ruthenian were tabulated as separate languages, although Ukrainian was simply the newer name for Ruthenian, used by the more politically conscious and nationalistic elements. In the Province of Polesie, the census authorities returned most of the Belorussians there as speaking 'local languages'." <ref name="US Census Bureau 1954. pp.74-75"/>
[[Nowogródek Voivodeship (1919–1939)|Nowogródek Voivodeship]] and [[Polesie Voivodeship]].<ref name="Piotrowski2">Piotrowski, op.cit., [https://archive.org/details/polandsholocaust00piot/page/143 <!-- quote=piotrowski nowogrodek majority. --> page 143]: ''[The Belarusians] were distributed as follows: Polesie, 654,000; Nowogrodek, 616,000; Wilno, 409,000; Bialystok,269,100''</ref> A 1954 study of the Polish population by the [[United States Census Bureau]] concluded that "in presenting the results, the Central Statistical office emphasized the central role played by the Polish ethnic group by increasing the number of minority groups, and thus reducing the size of a given group, shown in the results, Ukrainian and Ruthenian were tabulated as separate languages, although Ukrainian was simply the newer name for Ruthenian, used by the more politically conscious and nationalistic elements. In the Province of Polesie, the census authorities returned most of the Belorussians there as speaking 'local languages'." <ref name="US Census Bureau 1954. pp.74-75"/>


After [[World War II]] the pre-war chairman of the Polish census statistical office [[Edward Szturm de Sztrem]] was quoted by communist sources to have admitted that the returned census forms had been interfered with by the executive. This it was claimed, affected particularly those forms from the south-eastern provinces. The extent of the tampering is not known.<ref>Joseph Marcus (1983), p. 17;</ref> Another English language account stated that he admitted "that officials had been directed to undercount minorities, especially those in the eastern provinces".<ref name="Blanke">{{cite book|author=Richard Blanke|title=Orphans of Versailles: The Germans in Western Poland, 1918-1939|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=80r6Mbnxf8IC&pg=PA95|accessdate=17 October 2015|year=1993|publisher=University Press of Kentucky|isbn=0-8131-3041-7|page=95}}</ref>
After [[World War II]] the pre-war chairman of the Polish census statistical office [[Edward Szturm de Sztrem]] was quoted by communist sources to have admitted that the returned census forms had been interfered with by the executive. This it was claimed, affected particularly those forms from the south-eastern provinces. The extent of the tampering is not known.<ref>Joseph Marcus (1983), p. 17;</ref> Another English language account stated that he admitted "that officials had been directed to undercount minorities, especially those in the eastern provinces".<ref name="Blanke">{{cite book|author=Richard Blanke|title=Orphans of Versailles: The Germans in Western Poland, 1918-1939|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=80r6Mbnxf8IC&pg=PA95|access-date=17 October 2015|year=1993|publisher=University Press of Kentucky|isbn=0-8131-3041-7|page=95}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 22:15, 14 December 2020

Polish census of 1931
Mother tongue in Poland, based on 1931 census
GUS languages 1931
Media related to Polish census of 1931 - Statistics of Poland at Wikimedia Commons

The Polish census of 1931 or Second General Census in Poland (Template:Lang-pl) was the second census taken in sovereign Poland during the interwar period, performed on December 9, 1931 by the Main Bureau of Statistics.[1] It established that Poland's population amounted to 32 million people (over 5 million more than in the previous census of 1921).

The census was organised following the rules established by an act of the Polish Parliament of October 14, 1931. In contrast to earlier census of 1921, the 1931 census did not count national minorities and detailed information on types of farms, leaving only the question of the overall area of land owned by the citizen.[2] The part related to education was expanded to include questions of ability to read and write.

The results of the census were being published in 39 volumes between 1936 and 1939 in a publishing series "Statistics of Poland". A list of all settlements in Poland was also prepared, but only a part related to Wilno Voivodeship was published.

Results

The population was categorized by mother tongue i.e. the primary language in the following categories: Polish, Ukrainian, Ruthenian (i.e. Rusyn), Belarusian, Russian, Lithuanian, German, Yiddish, Hebrew, Local, Other, and Not Declared. The category "Local" (Template:Lang-pl) versus "Other" (Template:Lang-pl) was hotly debated after the fact, because a number of significant languages were not on the list, e.g., Romani, Armenian, and/or what might constitute transitional language e.g. Polesian, Kashubian and others.[3]

1931 Census of Poland Table 10 "Ludnosc- Population", pg.15
Population by first language Population by faith
  1. Total:               31,915,779
  2. Polish:             21,993,444
  3. Ukrainian:          3,221,975
  4. Ruthenian:         1,219,647
  5. Belarussian:         989,852
  6. Russian:               138,713
  7. Czech:                    38,097
  8. Lithuanian:             83,116
  9. German:               740,992
  10. Yiddish:             2,489,034
  11. Hebrew:                243,539
  12. Local:                   707,088
  13. Other:                     11,119
  14. Not Declared:         39,163
  1. Total:                         31,915,779
  2. Roman Catholic:       20,670,051
  3. Greco Catholic:           3,336,164
  4. Orthodox:                    3,762,484
  5. Protestant Lutheran:      424,216
  6. Protestant Reformed:       33,295
  7. Protestant Unite:            269,531
  8. Protestant (gen.):           108,216
  9. Other Christian:              145,418
  10. Judaism:                      3,113,933
  11. Other non-Christian:          6,750
  12. Non-believers:                    6,058
  13. Not Declared:                   39,663
[4]

The number of Polish native speakers relative to the total number of Roman Catholics may be overestimated, and possibly closer 17-18 millions.[citation needed]

The population was also categorized by religion. Most Jews spoke Yiddish, and many spoke Polish and Russian. These were categorized as two groups.[5] Statistical differences existed between Ruthenians and Ukrainians. Ruthenians nationwide were 96.5% Greek Catholic but only 3.2% Orthodox, compared to Ukrainians who were almost equally divided at 52.4% Greek Catholic and 46.6% Orthodox.[4][6] Most Ruthenians lived in provinces where the majority of the Ukrainian population was Greek Catholic, too.

By cities

By voivodships

Mother tongue controversy

The census used the concept of mother tongue and religion to classify the respondents, rather than nationality. The 1921 census had included a nationality question which was replaced in the 1931 census by the "mother tongue" question; this change was protested by Ukrainians and Jews[dubiousdiscuss] among others, many of whom were bilingual or trilingual.[7] Moreover, many Jews by religion - almost 12% - considered Polish to be their mother tongue in 1931.[3][8] However, a higher percent of Jews by religion - over 25% - considered themselves to be ethnically (or in terms of national identity) Poles, according to the previous census of 1921.[9] Thus the number of Jews by religion increased as a percentage of the population in the 1931 survey, relative to the numbers of Jews as an ethnicity in the 1921 Census.

This situation created a difficulty in establishing the true number of ethnic non-Polish citizens of Poland. Some authors used the language criterion to attempt to establish the actual number of minorities, which was difficult considering that over 707,000 people in Polesia declared that they spoke "local" rather than any other language.[10] Other authors used approximation based on both language and declared religion.[11] After World War II in Soviet bloc countries the interpretation of the census was used for political purposes, to underline the officially-supported thesis that pre-war Poland incorporated areas where the non-Polish population made up the majority of inhabitants. For this purpose some authors combined all non-Polish speakers in South-Eastern Poland (namely Ukrainians, Belarusians, Rusyns, Hutsuls, Lemkos, Boykos and Poleszuks) into one category of "Ruthenians").[12] In fact, the census had counted speakers of Belarusian, Ukrainian, Russian, and Ruthenian languages as separate categories[6]

Some authors contend that the change in questions asked by the census officials was due to the Polish government's wish to minimise the presence of minorities[3][13][14] and represented an attempt to maximize the effects of a decade of educational policies stressing the Polish language.[15] Tadeusz Piotrowski called the 1931 census official but "unreliable" for determining ethnicity, saying that by using language as an indicator of ethnicity it had underestimated the number of ethnic non-Poles, and that in particular, ethnic Poles were not a majority in the Nowogródek Voivodeship and Polesie Voivodeship.[16] A 1954 study of the Polish population by the United States Census Bureau concluded that "in presenting the results, the Central Statistical office emphasized the central role played by the Polish ethnic group by increasing the number of minority groups, and thus reducing the size of a given group, shown in the results, Ukrainian and Ruthenian were tabulated as separate languages, although Ukrainian was simply the newer name for Ruthenian, used by the more politically conscious and nationalistic elements. In the Province of Polesie, the census authorities returned most of the Belorussians there as speaking 'local languages'." [5]

After World War II the pre-war chairman of the Polish census statistical office Edward Szturm de Sztrem was quoted by communist sources to have admitted that the returned census forms had been interfered with by the executive. This it was claimed, affected particularly those forms from the south-eastern provinces. The extent of the tampering is not known.[17] Another English language account stated that he admitted "that officials had been directed to undercount minorities, especially those in the eastern provinces".[18]

References

  1. ^ Główny Urząd Statystyczny (corporate author) (1932). Drugi powszechny spis ludności z dnia 9 XII 1931r. Formularze i instrukcje spisowe (in Polish). Warsaw: Główny Urząd Statystyczny. p. 128. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  2. ^ Council of Ministers of the Republic of Poland (1931). Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 2 września 1931 r. w sprawie przeprowadzenia drugiego powszechnego spisu ludności (PDF) (in Polish). Warsaw. Dz.U. 1931 nr 80 poz. 629.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. ^ a b c Joseph Marcus (1983). Social and Political History of the Jews in Poland, 1919-1939. Walter de Gruyter. p. 17. ISBN 978-90-279-3239-6. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  4. ^ a b "Główny Urząd Statystyczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, drugi powszechny spis ludności z dn. 9.XII 1931 r. - Mieszkania i gospodarstwa domowe ludność" [Central Statistical Office the Polish Republic, the second census dated 9.XII 1931 - Abodes and household populace] (PDF) (in Polish). Central Statistical office of the Polish Republic. 1938. Archived from the original (PDF, direct download, table: page 30) on 2014-03-17.
  5. ^ a b US Census Bureau, The Population of Poland Ed. W. Parker Mauldin, Washington-1954. pp.74-75
  6. ^ a b (Polish) Główny Urząd Statystyczny (corporate author) (1932) "Ludnosc, Ludnosc wedlug wyznania i plci oraz jezyka ojczystego" (table 10, pg. 15)
  7. ^ Celia Stopnicka Heller (1993). On the Edge of Destruction: Jews of Poland Between the Two World Wars. Wayne State University Press. p. 68. ISBN 0-8143-2494-0. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  8. ^ Mendelsohn, Ezra (1987). The Jews of East Central Europe Between the World Wars. Indiana University Press. pp. 30–31.
  9. ^ Mendelsohn, Ezra (1987). The Jews of East Central Europe Between the World Wars. Indiana University Press. pp. 29–30.
  10. ^ Ben Fowkes (2002). Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflict in the Post-Communist World. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-333-79256-8. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  11. ^ Jerzy Tomaszewski (1985). Rzeczpospolita wielu narodów (in Polish). Warsaw: Czytelnik. p. 35., as cited in Piotrowski, op.cit., page 294
  12. ^ Henryk Zieliński (1983). Historia Polski 1914-1939 (in Polish). Wrocław: Ossolineum.
  13. ^ Tadeusz Piotrowski (1998). "Belorussian collaboration". Poland's Holocaust: Ethnic Strife, Collaboration with Occupying Forces and Genocide in the Second Republic, 1918-1947. McFarland. p. 294. ISBN 978-0-7864-0371-4. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  14. ^ Philipp Ther; Ana Siljak (2001). Redrawing Nations: Ethnic Cleansing in East-Central Europe, 1944-1948. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-7425-1094-4. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  15. ^ Ilya Prizel (1998). National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge University Press. p. 63. ISBN 978-0-521-57697-0. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  16. ^ Piotrowski, op.cit., page 143: [The Belarusians] were distributed as follows: Polesie, 654,000; Nowogrodek, 616,000; Wilno, 409,000; Bialystok,269,100
  17. ^ Joseph Marcus (1983), p. 17;
  18. ^ Richard Blanke (1993). Orphans of Versailles: The Germans in Western Poland, 1918-1939. University Press of Kentucky. p. 95. ISBN 0-8131-3041-7. Retrieved 17 October 2015.