User talk:Pahunkat

Pahunkat, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pahunkat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Your opinion of AI on Wikipedia?

Hi @Pahunkat:

It looks like you’ve been editing on Wikipedia for a while. Welcome! I’m a researcher working on Wikipedia algorithms and artificial intelligences (AIs). Maybe it seems a little random to hear from someone like me…if you’ve only been here for a little while, why would we care about your opinion?

You may or may not be aware of them, but the algorithms that operate on Wikipedia affect new editors like you in very important ways. Even if you’ve only made a few edits, we really need to understand how you feel about your initial experiences -- good or bad -- so that we can make sure that the AIs we build in the future do what users like you want them to do.

Would you consider talking with me briefly about AI on Wikipedia? I will send you a $15 Amazon gift card to say thanks. Reply to this message here or send me an email at smit3694@umn.edu and I can share more info and plan a time to connect.

Best, Estelle, aka FauxNeme (talk) 16:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Alan Turing Cryptography Competition

Hello, Pahunkat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Alan Turing Cryptography Competition.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Turing Cryptography Competition (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan Turing Cryptography Competition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alan Turing Cryptography Competition, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Mary's Church, Welwyn has been accepted

St Mary's Church, Welwyn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pahunkat! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help with WP:NOTABILITY, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

The Triplets

That cast section is not real! I don't know who did the English voices but they're certainly not the actors I deleted. Want it to STAY deleted 24.46.81.92 (talk) 13:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page... Please read comments I've made. Thanks Pahunkat (talk) 13:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

You may benefit from using RedWarn

Hello, Pahunkat! I'm Ed6767, a developer for RedWarn. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to try RedWarn, a new modern and user friendly tool specifically designed to improve your counter-vandalism experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by over two hundred other Wikipediansand feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor.

It's easy to get started with RedWarn. Unlike other anti-vandalism programs, it only takes a moment to get started. There's no setup or download. It runs on Windows, macOS, Chrome OS, Linux and more, and can be installed and used by any autoconfirmed user.

Installing RedWarn is risk-free and only takes a minute, and you can uninstall it at any time. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install and use it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on RedWarn's talk page at WT:RW. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed talk! 13:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ed6767: Sorry for the late reply (over one month now!), I've tried to install RedWarn a few times but my computer can't access toolforge.com. However, it does work when I'm not at home. Is there a way to circumvent this or should I continue using twinkle? Thanks! Pahunkat (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Pahunkat, it's no problem. What browser are you using? Second, have you made sure to whitelist toolforge.org (not .com) from any firewalls/other software? 🎄🎄 Ed talk! 🎄🎄 15:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

@Ed6767: - That did the trick! Just whitelisted toolforge.org and now it's working. Thanks! :-) Pahunkat (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Great to hear! Thanks for choosing RedWarn :) 🎄🎄 Ed talk! 🎄🎄 15:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

a notice

"Unexplained removal of content" wasn't "unexplained"

just explained to user Thumperward to delete and these ones since was going to delete everything — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.251.211.194 (talk) 21:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Just noticed you have been blocked as a proxy... Do you have an account I can talk to? Pahunkat (talk) 17:34, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion about First Lady and Second Gentleman-designate titles in infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff

Please join a discussion here regarding whether the terms "First Lady of the United States Designate" and "Second Gentleman of the United States Designate" should be in the infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff, spouses of the president-elect and vice president-elect, respectively. We need to come to a consensus. Thank you for your participation. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:26, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

@CookieMonster755: Have joined the discussion but will withhold my opinion until Pkeets clarifies what congress has said. Thanks! Pahunkat (talk) 18:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Pahunkat. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 02:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Anarchyte (talk • work) 07:53, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

What constitutes G1

For the recent pages you tagged under G1, only Draft:Why is silk produced ? is correct. Remember, G1 is only applicable if you can't understand anything being said. ToThAc (talk) 15:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know - I'll keep that in mind @ToThAc: Pahunkat (talk) 15:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Zoomcar edit

Thanks Pahunkat for being a contributing member of Wikipedia and all. I just wanted my refund back from zoomcar, which interestingly I did a few hours of making the edit on wiki and posting it on Twitter, and sending the screenshots of my edits to zoomcar support via mail.

So even though the edit might help others who have been waiting for their refunds from zoomcar for a few months now, I got my money back so I am gonna take some rest. Vivianjeet (talk) 10:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

@Vivianjeet:, you really shouldn't be taking your grievances against a company to Wikipedia - the edits on Zoomcar constitute vandalism and were reverted by another user. Just don't do it again. However contribute to wikipedia constructively from now on and we can probably forget about this incident in the future. Thanks! Pahunkat (talk) 11:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Is it vandalism if it is true? Vivianjeet (talk) 15:35, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

@Vivianjeet: Even if it is 'true', please refrain from posting your personal experiences with the company - especially without a valid source. Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 12:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Published Article

This is RadixxTheNefarious, and I wanted to let you know that I've published the Social Security Scam Wikipedia article, so you can take it off your "Ideas for articles" section on your user page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RadixxTheNefarious (talk • contribs) 17:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@RadixxTheNefarious: Thanks for letting me know, did you use any of the content I put in the sandbox? Pahunkat (talk) 17:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@Pahunkat: Yes, was that alright, or should I try rewording some more?

@RadixxTheNefarious: Of course that was fine! I was hoping to work on it before it was published but now that it's done we can work on it in article space. Is it ok if I request a move to SSA impersonation scam though, because that was the revised title that I think would represent it better? Pahunkat (talk) 17:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@Pahunkat: Yeah, that's fine.

how do you correct a name?

Poet Forugh Farrokhzad's name has been incorrectly spelled as Forough Farrokhzad. Most contemporary translators, essayist and film makers spell her name correctly as Forugh. We are trying to correct the error on Wiki. Therefore, we decided to create a page under the correct spelling. Yet you undid our work and redirected it back to the page with the incorrect spelling. Do you have another solution? Thank you.