Talk:Green retrofit: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Technical 13 (talk | contribs) |
Include Non-residential? |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
— [[User:SebastianHelm|Sebastian]] 08:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC) |
— [[User:SebastianHelm|Sebastian]] 08:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
: Seems to me "Green retrofit" also embraces non-residential buildings, so is a more inclusive term? [[User:Adabhael|Adabhael]][[User talk:Adabhael|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 05:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:04, 20 December 2020
Name of the article
After I created the article, I realized that "home energy retrofit" is actually more common than "green retrofit". I thought about renaming the article, but it would be a bit more work, because "home energy retrofit" probably doesn't contain some of the Simple steps. If other editors feel that the article should rather focus on home energy retrofits then I won't mind those entries that are unrelated to home energy to be removed.
Here's a table with the google counts:
term | google count | comment |
---|---|---|
home energy retrofit | 459,000 | |
green retrofit | 93,800 | |
home retrofit | 74,500 | |
energy retrofit | 61,100 | |
home performance retrofit | 7,690 |
— Sebastian 08:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Seems to me "Green retrofit" also embraces non-residential buildings, so is a more inclusive term? AdabhaelTalk 05:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)