Jump to content

User talk:MrOllie: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Confused new editor: not that new, actually. Strange
Not Adding Spam!: new section
Line 61: Line 61:


:You have me confused with someone else. - [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie#top|talk]]) 21:27, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
:You have me confused with someone else. - [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie#top|talk]]) 21:27, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

== Not Adding Spam! ==

Hey there!, I'm adding website links with the motive to add knowledge to the Wikipedia pages (wherever citation or broken links are present). The Link on [[Social media optimization|Social Media Optimization]] ( Reference 8) is also a blog. Please let me know how can we consider a blog from Oracle (that's outdated and broken)as worthy to stay live instead of a fresh and researched blog on some other website.

Revision as of 00:24, 23 December 2020

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Community ban discussion on Sievert 81/75000cases

Since you were involved in the investigation regarding Sievert 81/75000cases, I would like to notify you that there is currently a proposal to community ban them, if you weren't already aware. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 16:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rude comment

Mr. Ollie,

I appreciate the comment I left may seem rude and I'm not as such contesting that it be removed. It's simply that I tried to edit an article elsewhere that the user Tercer has been quite disparaging of. Calling standard references and terminology that I used "nonsense" and "idiotic" and clearly editing the article despite having little knowledge of the area (he made basic mathematical errors). I just became curious as to what other articles he has been present on as I think he is basically just censoring out positions he disagrees with. I even think Superdeterminism is a bit silly, but you can't just pull a reference describing it on an article devoted to it, especially if it is in fact referenced by an expert in Foundations. Again this isn't to contest or disagree with you. I simply tried editing Wikipedia a few days ago on an article related to my own expertise and found it controlled by somebody with little requisite knowledge and I'd be concerned how broadly this is occuring. 64.43.31.141 (talk) 18:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you get a warning for personal attacks, writing a message repeating them is an usual strategy. Just stop talking about other editors entirely, and focus on the content. - MrOllie (talk) 20:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undid revision 994117324 by MrOllie (talk) - Hoping to learn how to fix this properly.

Hello,

I'm very new to editing on Wikipedia so I'm writing here to try and learn what I did wrong in my recent edit to Job description that you undid. I was doing research for work to try and better understand the process of creating a job description. The article was very informative and helpful. The next day I looked at the article again and most of the useful information that was added by :Punsalang had been removed. The content that was put in its place didn't seem to make sense in terms of how it related to the section, and it was also just lacking much info at all, specifically the "roles and responsibilities," and "developmental goals," sections.

What can I do to make this right? Could I use the content originally put in by :Punsalang and just fix the broken references and broken grammar that you mention? My contribution so far has just been to revert changes, not add any content, but I'm happy to do what's necessary to fix this article and hopefully learn something along the way.

Thanks.Rumblyfish (talk) 20:01, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Software - Comparison List

MrOllie - I'd like to know why you reverted QuestionPro from the list of tools for survey platforms. Here are some citations about QuestionPro;

Can you please let me know if QuestionPro can be added? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubek~enwiki (talkcontribs)

That's a list of software that already has an article. Wait to see if your draft is approved first. And since you have declared a COI, you should use the requested edit process on the list's talk page rather than making edits yourself. - MrOllie (talk) 13:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - Kinda makes sense now. I'll wait for the Draft and see. Thansk for the tip on request edit vs doing it myself. Good point. Bubek~enwiki (talk) 23:34, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

job interview

Is it ok to leave my edits until after my job interview next Wednesday? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnchuaibd (talkcontribs)

No. Wikipedia is not for self promotion. - MrOllie (talk) 23:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with Changes

As per your comment, my changes are not neutral. I never understand your point because I added additional information for the readers to understand more about the page. I think the Wiki Pages should be updated with new information instead of keeping old information, that's why I added this information. If my content is promotional then I can agree with your comment, but my published content is totally user-friendly and worthy of them. I request to review again my content and it would be great if can publish it with as per knowledge. Nilesh (talk) 05:58, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place for you to simply add your personal opinion, you must write neutrally and you should base all additions on sources. Additionally, Wikipedia is not a howto site - you should not address the reader directly. - MrOllie (talk) 13:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confused editor

Nonsense? That sounds pretty opinionated to me. And very rude. My addition of the distinguish template was made in good faith, as I think the two diseases are very similar sounding and someone searching for one disease may get confused w Crazytonyi (talk) 21:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have me confused with someone else. - MrOllie (talk) 21:27, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Adding Spam!

Hey there!, I'm adding website links with the motive to add knowledge to the Wikipedia pages (wherever citation or broken links are present). The Link on Social Media Optimization ( Reference 8) is also a blog. Please let me know how can we consider a blog from Oracle (that's outdated and broken)as worthy to stay live instead of a fresh and researched blog on some other website.