Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zebraic: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:01, 4 January 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect all to ApologetiX per consensus (non-admin closure). HĐ (talk) 09:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zebraic

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this album meets the criteria at WP:NALBUMS and the only cited source is the record sleeve. FalconK (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages which are substantially identical (there is a page for each album this band released, having exactly the same format and general lack of citations or any evidence of notability):

Redirect all to ApologetiX - no justification for a separate article for any of them Spiderone 11:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I second this suggestion and reasoning. Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect all to ApologetiX - 44 albums in 28 years, plus 14 compilations and live albums and Xmas albums etc. etc., and not a single one of them got any reliable media notice and are only ever discussed within the band's esoteric fan community. The band themselves are low on media coverage too. It looks like they enjoy cranking out material for a committed group of fans but haven't crossed to the maninstream. If they're having fun with such an effort, good for them, but their releases have never attracted the notice necessary for notability in Wikipedia. Also, all the articles are mostly the work of the same two or three editors, and it looks like they're trying to assemble a comprehensive discography for purposes of fan trivia. That must be done elsewhere. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all to ApologetiX - I worked on a few of these, but that was a long time ago. I don't think any of them are notable per Wiki's standards.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''redirect all to [[ApologetiX]]''' per consensus (non-admin closure). [[User:HĐ|HĐ]] ([[User talk:HĐ|talk]]) 09:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 ===[[:Zebraic]]===
 {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}
@@ Line 40: / Line 47: @@
 *'''Redirect all''' to [[ApologetiX]] - 44 albums in 28 years, plus 14 compilations and live albums and Xmas albums etc. etc., and not a single one of them got any reliable media notice and are only ever discussed within the band's esoteric fan community. The band themselves are low on media coverage too. It looks like they enjoy cranking out material for a committed group of fans but haven't crossed to the maninstream. If they're having fun with such an effort, good for them, but their releases have never attracted the notice necessary for notability in Wikipedia. Also, all the articles are mostly the work of the same two or three editors, and it looks like they're trying to assemble a comprehensive discography for purposes of fan trivia. That must be done elsewhere. ---<span style="font-family: Calibri">[[User:doomsdayer520|<b style="color:#C71585"><small>DOOMSDAYER</small>520</b>]]<small> ([[User talk:Doomsdayer520|TALK]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Doomsdayer520|CONTRIBS]]) </small></span> 16:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 *'''Redirect all''' to [[ApologetiX]] - I worked on a few of these, but that was a long time ago. I don't think any of them are notable per Wiki's standards.--<span style="font-family: Arial Black;">[[User:Gen. Quon|<span style="color: #B22222;">Gen. Quon</span>]] [[User talk:Gen. Quon|<span style="color: #708090;">(Talk)</span>]]</span> 01:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>