Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2021/2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MusikBot (talk | contribs) at 04:35, 9 February 2021 (Archiving 5 nominations (0 approved, 5 unapproved)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Google


Google – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 24000 daily hits

  1. Support per nom, Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 19:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. North America1000 14:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Football Manager 2021


Football Manager 2021 – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 500 daily hits

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days MusikBot talk 04:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of fact-checking websites


List of fact-checking websites – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 500 daily hits

Comment: This article is, to be blunt, not very good. While the WP:NPOV issues would be obvious on an article titled "List of correct websites" or "List of websites that post the truth", for some reason a "List of fact-checking websites" is festooned with entries cited to themselves, entries with no citation at all, or entries cited to press releases. Since there are obvious political implications to inclusion (or exclusion) of any given site, I figure that involving myself with this cleanup would be a rather strenuous process, but I think someone ought to do it. jp×g 20:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days MusikBot talk 04:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apple Arcade


Apple Arcade – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~300 daily hits

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days MusikBot talk 04:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khmer Rouge


Khmer Rouge – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 2,800 daily hits

  • This is a top-importance article in several WikiProjects but is only C-class for all of them. It's frequently visited and is one of the most vital articles on Cambodia, the Vietnam War and Southeast Asia. It does not appear to have had any talk page discussion since 2009. Although the structure seems pretty good and a lot of content is there, it needs citation checks for unverified statements, some grammatical and content edits and this could be a big job. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 22:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    1. Oppose. This is definitely a big, important article, and the lack of any talk page activity is a little perplexing, but looking over it, I'm tempted to reassess it to B-class, as it looks pretty well-developed. I'm not sure this project could do much to help—I'd suggest perhaps requesting a peer review might be a better venue to seek review. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 00:43, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Support- definitely enough hits each day. Formatting issues could be a project work.BabbaQ (talk) 20:16, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days MusikBot talk 04:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Compendium


Compendium – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 181 daily hits

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days MusikBot talk 04:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia


Encyclopedia – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 4722 daily hits

  • Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001 and coming January 15 will be of 20 years. Even after 20 years articles Encyclopedia and Compendium are still incomplete and not at their best. Articles Topic is assessed as high important but rating is just B class. Needs to be improved.

Some of the issues and sources are shared @ Talk:Encyclopedia#Any takers ? . Thanks Bookku (talk) 13:20, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Neutral. Certainly an important article, and could use some expansion on certain facets. Still, we don't normally take on B-class pages and I don't see a compelling case for an exception here. Maybe if I examined closer I'd see it doesn't merit that assessment. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 05:12, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days MusikBot talk 04:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Mecca – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 2500 daily hits

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days MusikBot talk 04:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Visva-Bharati University


Visva-Bharati University – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 341 daily hits

  1. Support. Seems like an established institution worthy of our efforts, and I see things that could be improved. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 05:18, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days MusikBot talk 04:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sialkot


Sialkot – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 950 daily hits

One of Pakistan's main industrial cities eg.[1]. Could do with expansion as it is C class. CreativeNorth (talk) 17:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose I'm not seeing major issues that would require this project's help. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 05:03, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days MusikBot talk 04:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]