Talk:Jonas Alster

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 February 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by Onel5969 (talk · contribs) on 4 February 2021.

Biography: Science and Academia Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Physics: Biographies Start‑class

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Notability

Here are words from the nuclear physicist Professor Eli Barkai. Yeshurun (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Editors,

>> The merits of an article on the academic will depend largely on the >>extent to which it is verifiable.
The work of Jonas Alster was verified in the top facilities dealing with nuclear physics world-wide. This was emphasized in the text, for example we mention there the experiments in SLAC and Los-Alamos. The work of Jonas is rigorous and tested.

>>The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly >>discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable >>sources.
The work of Prof. Alster was the subject of a review in Physics Report, that he wrote. Physics reports, together with Review of Modern Physics, are the top two review journals in Physics. Very few people get invited to contribute such  reviews. Further, the journal is devoted to the whole community of physics, spanning all disciplines, e.g. Astro-physics, bio-physics, classical mechanics, fundamental particle physics, etc. The fact that Jonas wrote such a monograph is highly prestigious.   Further it is a great honor,  indicating the scholarly significance of his results and also to  his recognition, beyond  his specific field. The review in Physics Reports, is of course cited in the  page we created (Ref. [4]) and the subject of the report is based on his own work, which again indicates to the importance of his  achievements.

Sincerely
Eli Barkai