User talk:Materialscientist

• If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, cite your references in the article you edited; there is no use bringing them here.
• I turned off most notifications in my preferences, and therefore can't see pings, sorry.
• New messages go at the bottom.

August 2021

Hi, Recently you are reverting my edits in Draft: Tiruchirappalli metropolitan area, that I have nominated for deletion. I nominated this article for speedy deletion because the main Article is also available Tiruchirappalli metropolitan area, there is no need to have a draft with a exact name and content, hope you can understand can I nominate again for deletion? Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 08:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Fine, and I've deleted, but next time please specify the actual reason; G2 obviously did not apply. Materialscientist (talk) 08:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you,Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 08:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Syntechno

Hello Materialscientist, You deleted the article Draft:Syntechno (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) on the due to the 'G11'. This was the second version, which I completely rewrote in order to remove all signs of advertising, and added only the facts in an encyclopedic way. This article was written in exactly the same way as other companies from the list of laboratory diamond manufacturers (example , Apollo Diamond Gemesis Scio Diamond Technology Corporation ) and it seems to me that the removal of the only large company from Russia looks at least strange. It is made according to the same encyclopedic templates as other articles (despite the fact that in other articles there are much more advertising texts). I am not exaggerating its importance, but this company is one of the largest in the country and the only public company in Russia supported by the government (as indicated in 9 authoritative sources). Could you explain exactly what things seemed to you to be advertising, and whether it is necessary to create a new version? Best regards, Igor erferger (talk) 10:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello User:Materialscientist, I created a page for Alturki Holdings for the first time. It's not advertising as it's mentioned in the reason. This is a well known Holding Company in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and hence I created a page for it after researching it well. Mufaddalboxon (talk) 11:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC) Mufaddal

Basilico's

??? Confused what happened/is happening... Why did you delete the talk page and not the main page (not that I want you to but was there really some "unambiguous advertising" there that someone else placed? Couldn't that particular revision just be removed without having to delete the whole talk page. And there's still a speedy tag on the article.) Very confused... Ps https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Basilico%27s 🤦‍♂️Kingoflettuce (talk) 12:26, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

IP's sole contribution has been to speedy the article. Anti anti vaxxer?!🤣 Kingoflettuce (talk) 12:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

I dunno about the IP's motivation, but generally I'm reluctant to delete an article based on IP's tag. Not that there's any policy that pevents an IP from speedy tagging an article ... In any event, I declined the G11 tag. I did not restore the Talk page because I didn't want to undo Materialscientist's action without understanding more about what happened, but there is a DYK going on, and unless the article is deleted, the record of that DYK should be allowed to remain on the article's Talk page, not that I'm really familiar with the DYK process.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Restaurant articles almost always balance on the edge of deletion, as promos or due lack of notability. This one is well written, so I didn't delete it and left for a 2nd look. Talk page deletion was an error that I've fixed. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 14:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, I sort of realised that about restaurant articles--tough to toe the line. Thanks for the compliment though, I do what I can :) Kingoflettuce (talk) 06:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Faisal Al Ahmari

This may be a strange request-comment. I saw this article, and thought that it didn't satisfy biographical notability, and was working on an AFD. It was a poorly written stub, and an article should speak for itself, which this one did not. However, I was then checking the references by Google Translate. What I found is that two of them state that he received an award for a short film. I don't think that it looks like a major award, so I don't think that it satisfies notability. At about this point another reviewer tagged it for G7, and then you deleted it as G7. I disagree with G7, although I think it should be deleted at AFD. I think that the film award is a credible claim of significance, except that his flack doesn't know how to write a decent stub that will pass the credible claim of significance bar. So should it be restored only to go to AFD? Robert McClenon (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Please help get back my draft content

You deleted my early draft work while I am in the process of editing it. Please help show me where is the log so that I can save an off-line copy of my work. Thanks. It was here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PDS6502/sandbox

User:PDS6502 - Admins never restore copyvio. And you know where you copied it from. Put it in your own words before you put it in your sandbox. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

These were my own words. Actually, my Dad's own words and my own typing through dictation (Dad has glaucoma and can hardly see to use computer anymore). We did not copy any of this original material from anywhere, we were creating draft in place, on the fly, in the sandbox, with hope of comradely collaboration to help us wiki editing novices. Surely would have been nice for a warmer reception for us newbies. Feel so hurt and saddened with the reception we've since received.

Block Request

If you can please block ip "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:1700:8641:2FA0:180B:148A:4E92:6B9C" I believe this ip is evading blocked User (Dariuskantihero) here are the edits from 2600:1700:8641:2FA0:180B:148A:4E92:6B9C and blocked user Dariuskantihero This ip (2600:1700:8641:2FA0:180B:148A:4E92:6B9C) is clearly a direct block evasion of Dariuskantihero

2600:1700:8641:2FA0:180B:148A:4E92:6B9C https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Survivor_Series_(2006)&oldid=1038806930

Dariuskantihero https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Hell_in_a_Cell_(2021)&oldid=1028358227

This is clearly the same person that created the user Dariuskantihero. Chip3004 (talk) 22:04, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

nimapanathrang

Hello !!

Greetings,

How have you been ?

I created a page by the name of Pandit Vishwanath, this is my first article kindly help me to rectify my mistakes and help me to publish the page. Pandit vishwanath is an excellent artist, his voice touches the soul, if you have not heard about him i request you to kindly watch some videos on you tube.

i humbly request you to kindly help me to create his page and publish it.

regards

Gal Yosef

Hi, where is my draft please? speedy for what? i want to contest the nomination but where is the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion"? this is very unfair and I do not understand why you did this. ברטוביניו (talk) 07:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi again, you have deleted my draft and im trying to contest it but you are not anwering. please undelete it and restore the draft and alow me to contest the deletion which is unjust in my opinion and the reasons i believe arent right. I thing forbes, vouge and the other source in the draft are enough and also there is no advertising in the draft - if you see some, please indicate them and it will be fixed. I have consulted 2 editors as well and they agree with me but you deleted it without a way to do anything. Please help asap! ברטוביניו (talk) 10:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I've undeleted it, so that another admin could have a look. Materialscientist (talk) 11:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you but it was dleleted after a few minutes with no reason, can you help and please restore the draft to me so i can have it? becuase i cannot see it? ברטוביניו (talk) 14:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Please ask the deleting admin. Materialscientist (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Sanya SY150-9F

Hello, My page was deleted with speedy deletion under section G11. And it says my page promotes company,group etc and I need to rewrite it to be considered. Can you please explain the flaws with my content so that I can correct it accordingly.

ThanK you

Anu380 (talk) 11:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

WHY WOULD U DELETE MY ARTICLE

I was working on my article for 3 hours why would you delete it?????? Lbj23goat (talk) 13:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC).

Assistance needed

Good morning,

Hope you are well.

I don't understand why the page Ritamendozag had been deleted, it was a draft that I was working on it. This contest is about nonprofit foundation information, with the intention to let the public know about its existence, not to intent to promote or sell anything. I am not sure if the problem was that I created a Spanish language version of it or it's something else. All the content is original.

Can you please let me know how I can fix this situation?

Best Rigards

Deleted page Jay Prakash

Hi, you have just deleted page Jay Prakash for (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject) reason. page was a tag with 'under construction' and I was expanding the article. Jay Prakash has received the Wikimedians of the Year 'Tech Innovator' award for the year 2021 today and I can also see other award recipient pages, can you please help me to understand why this 'A7' is applicable to Jay Prakash page only?, Thanks -Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 19:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

References

A1 and A7

Could you please explain your deletion of Kinta Utara (federal constituency) per A1 and A7? I am struggling to see how the page fit under either of the criteria, given that there was sufficient context and a constituency is not a "real person, individual animal, commercial or non-commercial organization, web content, or organized event". It was a bad article, no question about it. But it did not fit those criteria and did not deserve to be speedily deleted. If another criterion applied, please point to those criteria. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Look, it was a 7-word article, with no references, a possible hoax created by a sock (puppet or master) on a defunct federal constituency. What do you want to do with it? Materialscientist (talk) 04:40, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Not use the wrong criteria? You're far more experienced than me: if it was sufficiently blatant G3 could have been used (though not in this instance) and G5 could have been used if it was in violation of a ban/block (I didn't make a note of who wrote it, so can't be sure). A PROD would probably have been appropriate, but A1 and A7 were not. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:59, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy re-create of speedy deleted

Just re-created Draft:I am in love with the imposter from among us, god i just want to suck on his nipples so bad. Time for a speedy block? 10mmsocket (talk) 08:09, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

/32 block?

I just blocked 120.29.97.74, but I see you previously blocked 120.29.97.74/32. Did you specifically include the /32 for some reason? If nothing else, it seems to be confusing the "Strike out usernames that have been blocked" gadget. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

There is an annoying bug in Wiki software, which is being resolved: we can't block an IP if it is autoblocked (due to a block on an account that edited from that IP). Adding /32 is a temporal solution. Materialscientist (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Ah, I remember seeing that. I even opened T288587 on it :-) I just didn't connect that the /32 was the workaround. Oh, but wait. I did manage to block it without the /32. Maybe that just means the autoblock expired by the time I got to it? My brain hurts. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

I just updated T287798 with some of this. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

User:Bhm yashwanth 765

Hi Materialscientist! It looks like you blocked User:Bhm yashwanth 765 as a sockpuppet but something seems to have gone wrong as they are still able to create articles. They created Draft:B H M Yashwanth today despite being blocked. Thanks. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:13, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of Blui Draft

Hi, you deleted my article Blui. I believe this was wrong and here is the evidence to support it. Blui is the mascot for the startup company ReMeLife. You can find evidence of the companies existence on remelife.io, remelife.com and remindmecare.com. On remelife.io you can see Blui flying in his spaceship at the bottom.

I believe that is enough proof that he is a part of the company but just incase I will continue with more evidence. There are three videos on the remelife youtube channel that he is a part of. The first is a video showing his journey that can he found here. The second is him landing, and can be found here. The third is him popping up at the end of a meet the team video that can be found here.

My final pieces of evidence are from the remelife subreddit which can be found here. As you can see, Blui is at the forefront of the subreddit with him being included on the banner. Him in his spaceship is also the profile picture of the subreddit. You can also find multiple posts that he is a part of. The first being a link to one of the YouTube videos, which you can find here. Another is, again, a link to a youtube video that Blui was in, which can be found here.

My only other point is that perhaps you thought that I was trying to pass of Blui as a real alien but in the first line I clarify that he is a fictional alien and the mascot for remelife. If you want that to be clearer then please let me know how you want it to be disclosed

Thanks!

Speedy deletion of Arturo Calle

I noticed you deleted a stub I had created about Arturo Calle. I created the article with two facts aiming to demonstrate his notability backed by two independent good references. I would like to continue to develop the article, please let me know what you think would address the concern and undelete the article. Do you have concern over the notability of the subject or is it that you think it needs more content to satisfy NPOV? Alan.ca (talk) 13:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

I have restored your article at User:Alan.ca/Arturo Calle. Notability aside, it was written in an unencyclopedic, promotional tone. Materialscientist (talk) 13:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

It’s a difficult situation when you want to make a small start on a BLP, I assumed the primary point was to highlight why the person is notable. I am not sure what I am going to do if all the sources on the man are positive. Can you give me some guidance on what I need to make an acceptable small stub about him? I have no need to promote the man, just found out he is a notable person in Colombia and wanted to help out by getting an article started about him. Alan.ca (talk) 20:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Block Request

Can you please Block Twistedriott, what Twistedriott has been doing is for example is changing content from summerslam 2016 is match5 Charlotte Flair defeated Sasha Banks (c) to Mickie James defeated Charlotte Flair (c), This user has received Final Warning which i warned Twistedriott that next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the Edit Summary and Twistedriott may be blocked without further Warning, See this below

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=WrestleMania_32&oldid=1039201015 https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Roadblock:_End_of_the_Line&oldid=1038551721 https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Royal_Rumble_(2017)&oldid=1038549949 https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=SummerSlam_(2016)&oldid=1039203995 https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_WWE_Raw_Women%27s_Champions&oldid=1039204429 https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_WWE_SmackDown_Women%27s_Champions&oldid=1039205533 https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Brie_Bella&oldid=1039204647

Clearly this User appears to ignore Warnings, Changes content from Wrestling Articles, Adds false information and Continues to do it even after many users including me had to revert Twistedriott's edits. Twistedriott is getting on my nerves because the user continues to do the same thing everyday despite Multiple Warnings from other editors. Chip3004 (talk) 18:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion review for Kinta Utara (federal constituency)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kinta Utara (federal constituency). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Moved

Hi, there Materialscientist can you moved Draft:Tropical Storm Fred (2021) to mainspace thank you HurricaneEdgar 09:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done thank you HurricaneEdgar 09:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Undeletion Request for Draft:Ebstar (Zimbabwean DJ)

Hi. I recently created a draft about Ebstar who is a DJ at Spinnin Records sublabel and it was speedily deleted with the reasons being its promotional stuff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ebstar_(Zimbabwean_DJ) There were over 12 citations and references here and I kindly ask for a review as I didn't intentionally promote this fellow,,, i simply cited official sources such as Genius & Spinnin Records as well as Apple Music for the discograhy. Please kindly point out where its promotional because i wrote this with transparency for a client, quoting and citing proven sources. You can put the article back in the draft space and i edit it again (after you clearly state where this is promotional so i remove. Facts are facts but i am willingly to conform the article to your requirements. I'm willing to ensure transparency and getting this page up for my client. I put a lot of work here and i hope you understand and help out

Please help Ebstar EMT2001 (talk) 17:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC).

References

Draft: Artiplanto page was seen as promotional. I stripped it of any promotional language and unverified/uncited claims.

I wrote an entry under Draft: Artiplanto. It was recommended for speedy deletion and was deleted before I could edit it.

All promotional language has been removed. All unverified claims. It should be good to go. Please review. Thanks so much.

Deltion of clever (Company)

hey don´t delete official Websiteses on Wikipedia.

Disruptive Editing

I would like to give you a heads up that Twistedriott has been Disruptive Editing in these article- List of WWE Raw Women's Champions, WWE Raw Women's Championship, List of WWE SmackDown Women's Champions, Roadblock: End of the Line, Hell in a Cell (2016) and Hell in a Cell (2017). It appears that Twistedriott ignores warnings and continues to do the same thing every day, I had enough of Twistedriott's Disruptive Editing, if Twistedriott continues to do it after being blocked and once the block expires I'm sure that 100% sure that Twistedriott will come back and do the same thing over and over every day. If you want to extended page protect these articles-List of WWE Raw Women's Champions, WWE Raw Women's Championship, List of WWE SmackDown Women's Champions, Roadblock: End of the Line, Hell in a Cell (2016) and Hell in a Cell (2017) then i am ok with that. Chip3004 (talk) 15:24, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Block

Hi Materialscientist--please have a look at User_talk:216.170.48.162#August_2021. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

• Materialscientist, you haven't responded: please see that same page for my explanation. I see that you don't see pings--that's unfortunate. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

  Sorry, I've missed why you invited me there. Now I see. Feel free to lift or amend my block at will - it was likely caused by an AIV report UW Dawgs, which I didn't analyze in detail. Materialscientist (talk) 16:52, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Draft:SpaceBEE

Hello, Materialscientist,

You recently deleted this as a CSD G13 but it was not eligible yet for this deletion criteria. Please, with any draft or user page tagged G13, check the edit history of the page to ensure that it hasn't been edited by a human editor in the past six months. Some new editors assume any draft can be deleted with a G13 tag but if the page has been recently edited by a human being (since, well, February 19, 2021), it is not eligible for deletion under this criteria. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Northern Mariana Islands CSD

• Was an incorrectly labelled talk archive. Created the correct archive and did a copy/paste. This page is now an orphan and duplicates the talk archive created. This CSD you have reverted doesn't have Talk in the page name. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:17, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Intesa Sanpaolo

Hi, I tried to revert a large deletion edit to the above article, but I couldn't because a message said there was a link to a Wikipedia blacklist site. This is too technical for me. Can you help? Thanks Denisarona (talk) 07:09, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Many thanks for your help. Denisarona (talk) 07:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

A beer for you!

You are a star. Thanks Denisarona (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Request

Hello, I have been struggling with vandalism on the English Wikipedia for a while. Can you put me in the "rollback" user group? Thanks. ×Elvorix^talk 12:13, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

@Elvorix: Have you tried tools like RedWarn and Twinkle? (Also, apply for rollback at WP:RFP/R) - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 13:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Tox (protocol) undo

"toxchat" is an TLA infesting a bunch of instant-messaging and related software. Too wide a range to block if I recall. I don't think there's an SPI filed yet, will take care of that detail tomorrow. DMacks (talk) 03:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Materialscientist. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Clovermoss (talk) 00:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

User talk:Onejokeaway#August 2021

Seems like you didn't actually set the block. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 05:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks.

User:Phenolla

It looks like you meant to block Onejokeaway instead? I have gone ahead and unblocked Phenolla. Sro23 (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Adtually I don't understand how the block ended up on Phenolla. Apologies. Materialscientist (talk) 05:37, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

G7 of the Userbox MfD

Hi MaterialsScientist,

I object to your deletion of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Politics/Ideology. I gave that some consideration, and the withdrawal is worth recording, and G7 did not apply. Please restore it. SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

User:Materialscientist, hello? SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

And I object to your objection. No, really, MarshallKe had a reason to delete that page; start your own if you wish to continue. Materialscientist (talk) 14:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

What was MarshallKe’s reason? And then, in any case, it was not G7 eligible (“the only substantial content of the page was added by its author” was not true). He was in a position to Withdraw and request a speedy close, not to remove all history of the discussion. These “delete all non-project-focused userboxes” MfDs are a developing trend, and the discussion in that MfD was meaningful. So please, reverse the improper G7 deletion. SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Materialscientist (talk) 14:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Do you want to close it? Or courtesy blank it? SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

I read MarshallKe’s last post to it, and think courtesy blank. Personally, I don’t know where the community is going with this, but it may be somewhere. SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, original author of the MfD here. The reason it should be deleted is because it is proposing deletion of the wrong page (also I don't know how to properly propose deletion of a bunch of items at the same time, which is the goal). I would like someone more knowledgeable than me to re-create the MfD or whatever post is appropriate and to delete this malformed MfD. MarshallKe (talk) 16:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Ray Blanchard

Hi, perhaps you can block to real vandal, and rev/delete the defamatory content. Thank you, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Politics/Ideology

Why did you restore this? I am the original author of the deletion request and I removed it because it was malformed. MarshallKe (talk) 15:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) looking at the page history, Matsci didn't restore it??? -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 15:49, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

it shows up here MarshallKe (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Oh, I just needed to rotate my eyeballs slightly upward and read the conversation above MarshallKe (talk) 16:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Unexplained revert

Can you give a reason for this revert? The editor who added the material (BananaPlant9999) has expressed confusion since no reason was given. (Admittedly, the section was over-heavy with primary sources, but a courtesy explanation to the new user might be in order.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Huggle showed me only one part of their 4-step edit. Materialscientist (talk) 19:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

That doesn't really clarify the issue. What part of their edit did you think you were reverting, and for what reason? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

This. I thought it was unnecessary. Doesn't matter, my revert was in error. Materialscientist (talk) 19:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Umm?

Hello, admin, I've shocked when you removed Aung Myo Min, a government minister of NUG. Clearly passes WP:NPOL. As I am one of the main editors of Burmese project, I still can't believe my eyes the minister's article was deleted. Government minister is default notable on Wikipedia. It is very one-sided and unresearched. I disagree your decision and pls kindly nominate for deletion of you disagree. Pls kindly restore the article if you agree. Thanks. Taung Tan (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Materialscientist (talk) 14:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks admin for your justice.There are strong reliable sources from the international and local major media [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] and many many more. Hello the nominator FULBERT It is bullying and you did nonsense case even you are a senior new page reviewer. Taung Tan (talk) 14:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

This should not happen at all. I do not understand yet. I noted that the government ministers and members of Parliament are auto notable on Wikipedia according to my experience on Wiki. It is very over. I want to put this to ANI. Taung Tan (talk) 14:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

FULBERT should've dug deeper before he tagged for a speedy deletion; it's totally clear that Aung Myo Min meets NPOL. Regards, Htanaungg (talk) 14:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Wasei-kango

Hello. I noticed that you reverted an edit by 206.174.197.170 on the said article. They proceeded to remove more content even after you gave out your reason for removing their contribution. Their newer edits aren't balantant vandalism, but they have left profane edit summaries. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 16:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Article: Atul Raghav

Hi,Materialscientist (talk · contribs). The article Atul Raghav should not be deleted. Kindly revert the edit and undelete the article. I know the fact, this page was made by some other user and was deleted earlier due to lack of independent sources because it's hard and takes a lot to show a 16 year old notable and significant personality. Taekwondo is not much highlighted in India but this boy has achieved a lot and is very well known for his game in our nation. Infact, the result of his matches and news coverage are there on internet. Instead of deletion, you can site this article to improve it further but this page should not be speedily deleted.--Divineplus (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC).

Moontime777 (talk) 17:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC).

Hello Materialscientist,

BabyDogeCoin wikipedia page got deleted by you. I am not involved with them in anyway. I just inform people that they help dogs out, i was neautral at that subject.

I want that you know that. I talked before i posted it to @Girth_Summit and it was all fine. Helped me out 96% of writing the texts.

So i really don't know what made you think its a advertisment.

Please put it back. Thank you, have a nice day!

Kind regards, Moontime777

Re: Tanya Selvaratnam Edits

Hi Material Scientist,

I am Tanya's personal assistant and I am simply removing information per her request. Please do not revert any changes.

Thanks

Jeremiah's Grotto

MSc, thanks a lot for helping out with that redirect deletion! Liz warned me that if it doesn't happen more or less instantly, I'm in trouble. ♫ It ain't necessarily so! Thank you, Arminden (talk) 18:09, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Erroneous G3 deletion

English subtitles for the 20-second sample of Freakum Dress by Beyonce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

You erroneously deleted this page per G3 after someone else had tagged it, but it should have been moved back to TimedText:Beyonce_FreakumDress.ogg.en.srt, from which it was moved erroneously by the creator. This was a plausible good-faith attempt to provide subtitles to this audio file. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Materialscientist blocked 206.15.252.222 with an expiration time of 9 years, 364 days, 19 hours, 37 minutes and 12 seconds

What the heck it was be that there!?! 2405:9800:BA31:F6:4C39:B710:9495:1CD5 (talk) 05:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

It's actually common practice to place school IPs under such long blocks if the people using them are habitual vandals whose unconstructive behavior leads the IP to get repeatedly blocked.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:44, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

The block was for 10 years, but Wiki software changes it according to some calendar, hence 9 years, 364 days, 19 hours, 37 minutes and 12 seconds. Materialscientist (talk) 06:00, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

There is an older block to this IP with unusual block duration: 4 years, 365 days, 43 minutes and 12 seconds (blocked on 18 October 2012). Why? 2405:9800:BA31:F6:4C39:B710:9495:1CD5 (talk) 06:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Same reason. Input numbers are always simple integers, 5 years in the latter case. Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 25 August 2021 (UTC)