Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Anne Rothschild

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 14:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Anne Rothschild

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability beyond being one of the survivors of the Titanic, and apparently insisting that her dog be saved along with her. While it is an interesting tidbit, there are no reliable sources that establish any notability, and the subject does not pass WP:NBIO. AryKun (talk) 09:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, since I've been unable to make out any other conceivable claim to notability she might have, and what's there is obviously not enough. Also no objections to turning this into a redirect to Passengers of the Titanic, which already has a bunch of relatively random passenger names redirect to it, but I'm honestly fine with leaving it to whatever opinion the closer has of WP:CHEAP. AngryHarpy‍^talk 10:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are no verifiable sources to prove Wikipedia:Notability (people). 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 18:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Verifiable sources certainly exist for every claim in the article. They might not be WP:SIGCOV, but we have no reason to suspect anything in the article is false or original research. pburka (talk) 16:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has no evidence of notability.Mwinog2777 (talk) 05:19, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. According to her 1943 obituary in the New York Times, Pius XII gave her a Papal Distinguished Merit Cross in 1941 (presumably a Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice). That may be sufficient for WP:ANYBIO. pburka (talk) 14:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found references to two museum exhibits related to the dog: Titanic dogs (National Museums Liverpool) and Remembering the 12 dogs aboard the Titanic (Today, discussing an exhibit at Widener University Art Gallery, in Chester, Pennsylvania). Beccaynr (talk) 04:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that counts as in-depth coverage, as both mention her only in passing as the owner of the dog. In any case, these sources don't seem like enough to make an individual dog notable, let alone the owner of one of them. AryKun (talk) 10:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletedoes not meet WP:GNG--Rrmmll22 (talk) 00:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.