Talk:Action Tae Kwon Do

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Hong Kong: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Low-importance).

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (297)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,067)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,516) • Stub-Class articles (6,677)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (379) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,339)

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Film: Chinese

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts

The article dont stand alone.

This should merge with the 1972 film hong kong film crush and in fact is the same film. This dhould be merged Waltzingmogumogupeach (talk) 07:29, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From this comment made in the article by an editor that was later blocked for inserting unsourced content: "However, the movie might be non existent and rather a mistranslation of the chinese title of the 1972 hong kong movie Crush (1972 film) which is 唐手跆拳道 in chinese.跆拳道 means tae kwondo."

The 1972 film Action Tae Kwon Do was directed by 楊曼怡 (Yang Man Yi) according to these two sources:

"戰北國 (Action Tae Kwon Do) film poster". Hong Kong Movie Database. Archived from the original on 2022-02-05. Retrieved 2022-02-05.
"戰北國". Sin Chew Daily (in Chinese). 1974-01-04. p. 11. Retrieved 2022-02-05 – via NewspaperSG. Ministry of Communications and Information.

The 1972 film Crush [zh] was directed by 屠光启 (Tu Guangqi) according to these two sources:

"唐手跆拳道 (The Crush) film poster". Hong Kong Movie Database. Archived from the original on 2022-02-05. Retrieved 2022-02-05.
""唐手跆拳道"四院今天起獻映". Nanyang Siang Pau (in Chinese). 1972-09-30. p. 25. Retrieved 2022-02-05 – via NewspaperSG. Ministry of Communications and Information.

Since the films have different directors, they are different films. Cunard (talk) 11:07, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cunard: Thanks for illustrating that the two films are indeed distinct and that was educational because I did not know and seems you got most of the info correct. Thanks again. Waltzingmogumogupeach (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]