Jump to content

Talk:Human origins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 196.189.54.49 (talk) at 06:56, 3 March 2022 (Contents). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Untitled

I disagree with having a redirect from human origins to human evolution. I think Wikipedia should give more attention (than it has) to religious ideas such as Young Earth Creationism (which I personally disagree with) and Old Earth Creationism (which I agree with).

If we do this, of course, we should be careful not to give any impression that we (as an encyclopedia) are endorsing any view, as this would violate NPOV. Nor should we give the impression that scientific community (in general) - or any significant minority of individual scientists - give any more support for non-materialist positions than they actually do.

We must be fair and impartial, not partisan. --Uncle Ed 19:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a link to the alternative supernatural explanations at the top of the human evolution page. However, the scientific explanation is the only one backed by verifiable, reliable sources, so has to be given precedence under Wikipedia's core policies. Tim Vickers 22:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contents

visit Ethiopia VISIT ETHIOPIA visit Ethiopia VISIT ETHIOPIA visit Ethiopia VISIT ETHIOPIA visit Ethiopia VISIT ETHIOPIA visit Ethiopia VISIT ETHIOPIA visit Ethiopia.