User talk:Mulder1013

May 2020

Hello, I'm PCN02WPS. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rod Blagojevich have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How is it not constructive? The man himself said he was a Trumpocrat. His party affiliation needs to be changed to reflect that. Mulder1013 (talk) 17:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He may have said that, but the fact is that the Trumpocrat Party does not exist and that particular statement (which was preceded by his saying "my fellow Democrats") was more so intended to show his support or thanks for President Trump. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm AeschyIus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ezra Furman—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. aeschyIus (talk) 23:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom sanctions standard notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 10:14, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at White pride. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 08:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 08:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it ok to have black pride, Asian pride, and gay pride but for some reason White pride is bad? This is bullshit Mulder1013 (talk) 08:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest reading the FAQ at the top of Talk:White Pride, it's not the same concept as other prides. FDW777 (talk) 09:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. The liberal left say it's bad...fuck them losers. I'm proud to be white, doesn't make me a bad person. Stop making it bad to be white. You're embarrassing yourself. Mulder1013 (talk) 18:48, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I'm Schazjmd. Your recent edit to the page Brent Venables appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 01:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brent Venables

My changes are not premature. It's all over the news now Mulder1013 (talk) 01:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then include a citation to a reliable source with your edit. Schazjmd (talk) 01:56, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brent Venables

How?? Its on ESPN. Mulder1013 (talk) 01:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then you wait for a published source to cite. (And why are you starting a new thread for each of your replies? You've been an editor for six years, you should know how to use a talk page. And to cite sources.) Schazjmd (talk) 01:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on my phone. This shit is difficult to do via phone. All you gotta do is look on ESPN. Mulder1013 (talk) 02:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A guy I know who writes for TigerNet talked to some of Venables family and was at the airport to watch Venables and his family board a plane with the Oklahoma president and AD. I'd say that's pretty solid sources. Plus Chris Low and ESPN are reporting, the OU AD tweeted a 🔒 emoji. Brent Venables is the new Oklahoma head coach. Mulder1013 (talk) 02:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at DC Extended Universe. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How is it disruptive?? The OFFICIAL name was NEVER the DCEU. A writer came up with that as a joke. A press release from Warner Bros. Discovery has announced the name is the DCU or the DC Universe. This article should be changed to reflect the official name. Mulder1013 (talk) 21:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We don't care that it's not the official name. See WP:COMMONNAME. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But you do care that the MCU is the official name. Kinda lame if you ask me... Mulder1013 (talk) 21:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not read what I said? "MCU" is the common name and so is DCEU. Sometimes the 2 happen to coincide. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]