User talk:Ronnie Macroni

Welcome!

Hello, Ronnie Macroni, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Draft:Battle Of Kangra (1333) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle Of Kangra (1333) (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle Of Kangra (1333) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ronnie Macroni! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle Of Ghanaur (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle Of Ghanaur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Delhi (1783), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Battle of Rohilla, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 10:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at First Battle of Chamkaur. - Arjayay (talk) 10:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Battle of Chappar Chiri, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 10:50, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Am I allowed to add battles in List of battles between Mughals and Sikhs and other? Ronnie Macroni (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Battle of Shahi Tibbi, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Silikonz💬 21:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to find the sumbit your draft for review option Ronnie Macroni (talk) 22:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Shahi Tibbi moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Battle of Shahi Tibbi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has too many problems of language or grammar and Re-draftifying article.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Shahi Tibbi (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Shahi Tibbi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 07:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sikh Attack on Nader Shah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sikh Attack on Nader Shah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikh Attack on Nader Shah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HistoryofIran (talk) 11:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Outnumbered Sikh battles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outnumbered Sikh battles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outnumbered Sikh battles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lennart97 (talk) 02:49, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ronnie Macroni! Your additions to Battle of Kahlur have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kahlur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Kahlur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kiratpur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Kiratpur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:55, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Battle of Sutlej is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:37, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kiratpur

Hello

Just so you know I added some reliable sources to the Battle of Kiratpur and added some details and have submitted the page for review. Good work on creating the page it just needed some touch up. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 07:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Battle of Pipli Sahib is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Pipli Sahib, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dal Khalsa. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Peshawar (1834), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your creation of articles related to Sikhism

		The Sikhism Barnstar
		Thank you for creating and improving many articles relating to Sikhism. Here is a token of my gratitude.

CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 07:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ronnie Macroni (talk) 14:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your creation of articles related to Sikh military history

		Military Barnstar
		Thank you for your creation of articles related to Sikh military history. You have created many articles covering various battles and we all appreciate your hardwork and efforts in doings so. Happy editing! ThethPunjabi (talk) 00:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ronnie Macroni (talk) 05:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Anandpur (1695) moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Battle of Anandpur (1695), is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thank you for creating new high quality articles about Sikh battles almost everyday. You have done an amazing job. Keep it up! CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 05:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]