Talk:Great Flood of 1862

A fact from Great Flood of 1862 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 October 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Great Flood of 1862 inundated or swept away towns, mills, dams, flumes, houses, fences, and domestic animals in Oregon, California, Nevada, and Arizona?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/October.

Wikipedia

Oregon Top‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

California B‑class Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Utah B‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Low-importance).

Weather: Non-tropical / Floods Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Floods task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sourjax.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bankruptcy Reference

I think statement "State of California went bankrupt" in the opening section should have a reference. Kevink707 (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

see Great_Flood_of_1862#Economic_impact --Asiaticus (talk • contribs) 00:38, 2016 September 28 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Flood of 1862. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Flood of 1862. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

City rebuilding section

I was reading the section on the flood's impact on Sacramento, and saw this: "At the time, Chinese labor force consisted of immigrants accustomed to the Mediterranean climate that closely resembled that of their homeland." What part of China is Mediterranean climate?? When I look at a Koppen climate map, southern China's climate is the same as the American South -- wet and humid, not dry summers like Spain/Italy etc. The northern part of China is also nothing like Sacramento. There's no part of China I see with Mediterranean climate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:7C0:C500:3540:2CAC:6E32:F6CF:E7C3 (talk) 05:34, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That does sound strange, I agree. I checked the text and it was added by a WikiEdu editor; when I checked their source in that paragraph, it made no mention of "Mediterranean climate". Maybe a bit of original research. Anyway, that sentence made no sense in context either so I've removed it. Schazjmd (talk) 15:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Financial Impact - One of these numbers is wrong

In the introduction it says:

The storms caused approximately $100 million 1861 USD in damage, approximately equal to $299.9 billion

One (or both) of these numbers is wrong, and the financial impact needs a reference. There is no way that $100M is worth 3000x more even after 150 years. Online inflation calculators say $1 in 1862 would be worth $27.16 today. So either it's $100M --> $2.7B or the $299.9 billion would need to be put into 1862 dollars (around $11B - which I seriously doubt). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.202.116.61 (talk) 08:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That content was added last month by @LightandDark2000:; pinging them to address the sourcing and conversion questions. (Probably just a typo, but does need a source.) Schazjmd (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is in the billions. Not only is it referenced, but the inflation calculator shows that that $100 million (1861 USD) is worth around $3.117 billion (2021 USD) today. Do your research next time before criticizing others. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 20:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for correcting the figures in the article. Schazjmd (talk) 21:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

graphic

The overlaying of modern satellite pictures with the flooded areas is problematic as various geographical features have changed, it particular the quite visible salton sea did not exist in 1860s. I might be better to do that overlay with a map show the california of the 19th century than a current satellite picture.--Kmhkmh (talk) 07:07, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 17 is gone

But it is on the wayback machine

https://web.archive.org/web/20160307013237/http://www.parkerdesign.info/AR_site/html/history.html

http://www.parkerdesign.info/AR_site/html/history.html

If I knew how to repair that I would.

Also https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/atmospheric-rivers-california-megaflood-lessons-from-forgotten-catastrophe/ contains infor not found in the article Fxmastermind (talk) 11:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fxmastermind: I fixed the reference to parkerdesign.info, but it's not clear that was ever a reliable source (despite probably looking like a spiffy-looking website at one point). Also, I haven't read the Scientific American article, so I'm not sure what information you hope someone will add to the "Great Flood of 1862" article from SciAm. -- RobLa (talk) 03:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will get to it eventually. It's a lot to take on, but fortune favors the bold, and there is no hurry. Fxmastermind (talk) 02:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]