User talk:Nerdboy8282

Welcome!

Hello, Nerdboy8282, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Norm The Genie, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
How to write a great article
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 17:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Norm The Genie

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Norm The Genie, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 17:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I’m trying to redirect this Nerdboy8282 (talk) 17:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. MOS:TVNOW wizzito | say hello! 20:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very fancy, mb Nerdboy8282 (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hermann Göring, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

nah😂 😂 😂 Nerdboy8282 (talk) 17:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 17:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nerdboy8282 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey! I admit I made some mistakes while on wikipedia and humbly request to be unblocked. I do not plan on doing it again and, if unblocked, understand that if I do do it again I will accept my punishment and be blocked for a much longer time. I love editing pages and I got carried away.

Decline reason:

I don't see any mistakes. I see deliberate destructive vandalism. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nerdboy8282 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, and I apologize for any ill effects of this vandalism, and sincerely promise to it do them again. I take full responsibility for my actions and humbly request to be able to edit again. If you look at my old edits, for the most part, they are all sincere and valid

Decline reason:

"to it do them again"? Not sure that's what you meant but I don't like the sound of that. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Apologies

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nerdboy8282 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, I do not want to do them again. That was a grammar mistake. I am so sorry. To put it clearly, I will NOT do anything like that again

Decline reason:

Please describe what constructive edits you would make. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.