Jump to content

Talk:List of individual trees

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 08:52, 5 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "List" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Plants}}, {{WikiProject Forestry}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Removal

Removed from the List of individual trees:

"*Tyburn Tree, the name given to a gallows which stood in London, England between 1571 and 1783. The name is derived from elm trees which stood near the site, which was used as a place of execution before the construction of the gallows."

Tyburn 'tree' is not a tree at all, it is a figurative term for a (wooden) gallows, and derives from the gallows situated at Tybrun in London. The place name does not derive from elms, but means 'boundary place'. - MPF 09:35, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

"The General Grant tree, the official Christmas tree of the United States..." My impression is that the official tree is on the White house lawn. Wetman 06:36, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Verified. Official designation is "Nation's Christmas Tree."

Page title

This page should be moved back to List of famous trees. It is a listing of notable individual trees; List of trees instead suggests a list of tree species or genera. - MPF 20:44, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Agreed. Either that or add in famous/important tree species/groups. EG - Wollemia
Agree here as well. - Briarfallen (talk) 12:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

adding to list

What criteria are being used for addition of trees to this list?

Courtland 02:58, 2005 May 29 (UTC)

The Wonderboom

The article at Wonderboom is pretty lame, but maybe it could be fleshed out and added to this list.72.196.104.129 01:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should the joshua tree from U2's album be included?

Has there been any prior discussion on whether the actual joshua tree, as seen on the cover of U2's "The Joshua Tree" album, belongs on this page? It could be added to the list of famous North American historical trees, or under the North American "other" section.

Pros: It's well recognized, or at least the album cover is. People make pilgrimages to the site of the tree.

Cons: Joshua trees technically aren't trees. But there's no "List of famous yuccas" page. Its location isn't well-known.

GMOTSL 02:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

methuselah still the oldest tree?

I just read this article on MSN talking about five thousand to seven thousand year old hybrid scrub oaks: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19577541/

Anne Frank Tree

How about the Anne Frank Tree? What is the criteria? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.73.44.61 (talk) 17:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

North America: added Atlas Grove Iluvatar & Lost Monarch

Just added Atlas Grove Iluvatar.

It's even more famous than the largest known redwood Lost Monarch - which probably is worth adding too.

Atlas Grove Iluvatar was the tree focused on the most, by best-selling author Richard Preston. Iluvatar is the tree that became promoted in Ilustrations. And researcher Robert Van Pelt, further expanded the tree's fame in his book about Pacific Coast giant trees. Atlas Grove Iluvatar is basically on par with Hyperion. Both trees were introduced to the public via the same handful of big tree hunters.ThreeWikiteers (talk) 16:14, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added Lost Monarch too, which is the largest known coastal redwood. It's less illustrated than Iluvatar, but equally famous, since it's the largest.

Newton

I've heard that the apple tree (or at least a relative of it) Isaac Newton was sitting under when he had his 'eureka' moment with the law of gravitation is still standing. Anyone know where? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thisnamestaken (talk • contribs) 19:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a page about it, and I agree that it should be listed. The page describes the original tree, and mentions several clones that have been cultivated. I have seen the one in Cambridge (UK); it is very popular with tourists. Poslfit (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

South America

What About South America??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.1.6.227 (talk) 15:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure the amazon doesn't contain anything interesting. 173.17.186.20 (talk) 04:11, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lech, Czech and Rus (Oaks of Rogalin)

It strikes me that the trees representing the mythical fathers of the Poles, Czechs and Russians ought to be included in this list. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lech,_Czech_and_Rus#Oaks_of_Rogalin 24.23.168.135 (talk) 06:45, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Other trees

If we're listing the Disney Tree of Life, why not the Swiss Family Treehouse tree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.69.193 (talk) 08:44, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another old tree

I just read this story.

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/weird-wide-web/1200-year-old-tree-blown-down-wind-wales

Unfortunately this tree is now uprooted due to a windstorm. Based on the stated information it is older than some others listed in this article.

Wanderer57 (talk) 23:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Girth

Does girth mean the diameter of the tree trunk? If so, at what height please? Wanderer57 (talk) 23:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The drive-through redwood (or sequoia)?

Shouldn't that Northern California redwood (or perhaps sequoia?) that they carved an automobile drive-through hole into be listed? [signed] FLORIDA BRYAN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.153.234.136 (talk) 01:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of trees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:09, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Be positive

I just removed unnecessary negative tags at the top of the article, {{refimprove}} and {{cleanup}}, plus unnecessary multiple issues packaging, which have made the article look bad since mid-2015. They displayed approximately: 

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. 
(Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2015)
This article contains embedded lists that may be poorly defined, unverified or indiscriminate. (August 2015)

Hey if you have specific referencing concerns state them here or use inline tagging to mark what you have a problem with. But the majority of rows in this list-article have no sources because the topics are well-sourced in their linked articles, which is FINE. The sources do not need to be here, unless there is something controversial. Trees are not controversial, are they? Have a nice day. :) --doncram 22:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of notable trees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of notable trees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Old Oak Tree NJ North America

This tree has died and been taken down. It should be moved to the historical section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.163.254.158 (talk) 00:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of notable trees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hollow Tree

I assume Hollow Tree should be added to the list? ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:15, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:07, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Geography Error

Multiple trees in Mexico are listed in the South America section. Mexico is in North America. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.211.64.215 (talk) 17:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restructuring

I think this page should be restructured for easier reference based on reason of notability. The main categories will remain geographical (continental), then subcategories such as Religious, Otherwise Historical, Size, Age, and Other. I don't want to unilaterally change this page entirely. Is there any support for this idea? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubbleobviously (talk • contribs) 17:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico is geographically in North America, NOT South America!

List of trees in Mexico should be placed under North America 2600:1700:46B3:3000:31AE:72AF:F6C5:22BB (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done (Well, moved under Central America heading.) Tdslk (talk) 18:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Door Tree

Hello all, I just started an article for Door Tree in Hamden Connecticut. Can someone help me add it to the list? Thanks much Bruxton (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I figured it out. Bruxton (talk) 18:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico is North America

Mexicos trees are listed as Central American. Under no standard classification is Mexico in Central America. For reference: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continent Maybe drop the separation by continent and just have a big list, sortable by age, location, and such? 186.18.86.218 (talk) 02:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_individual_trees&oldid=1203651052"