Jump to content

Talk:Sam Loyd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 05:47, 18 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Pennsylvania}}, {{WikiProject Philadelphia}}, {{WikiProject Chess}}, {{WikiProject Biography}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Old talk

I'm not sure if the solution is best given on the image page (where I've put it) or on the article page, or somewhere else. The image page keeps it away from view for people trying to solve the problem, but it's clogged up with some stuff about the images edit history and so on. If somebody wants to move the solution therefore, go ahead. --Camembert

Just to note: the solution is now found at Excelsior (chess problem). Seems reasonable enough, I suppose. --Camembert 23:12, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think this page is too small for a genius like Sam Loyd Jeroje 14:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)jeroje[reply]

The ranking of 15th in the world seems suspect. From what I can see on the chessmetrics web site, at Paris 1867, Loyd (who had not been rated before) scored 0 against opponents rated 2686. For some reason that gets a performance rating of 2466, but that can surely only be a maximum limit. Athulin (talk) 13:09, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reception and balance

As a biography, it’s particularly important to provide balance – Loyd is recognized both as America’s greatest puzzler, but also as a liar, huckster, hoaxer, and has been called rather worse things besides (e.g., claiming credit for 15 puzzle, tangram history hoax, etc.).

I’ve had a stab at a balanced (and referenced) view of his reception in this revision, but please feel free to improve!

—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 01:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I aggree. This isn't a very good article yet for such an interesting character, and focuses too heavily on chess.

- Anonymous (2010-12-04) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.232.118.38 (talk) 19:47, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sam Loyd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A vandal edit was not corrected in time

It is this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Sam_Loyd&diff=next&oldid=1141645911 Now I'll edit out "Dudney" for the correct "dudeney" Santropedro (talk) 03:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]