Jump to content

User talk:Cromulent Kwyjibo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Edgarde (talk | contribs) at 14:58, 6 June 2007 (Glenn Quagmire citation). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Cromulent Kwyjibo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Lst27 18:11, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome and thanks for the advice! Cromulent Kwyjibo 18:13, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Family Guy Band

I know where but its much easier to just upload a photo. File:Genes tounge.jpg

Hey Cromulent Kwyjibo

For improving the Wiki, I award you this barnstar. Redwolf24

I would love to award you the TV Barnstar for your work on television related articles, but alas, there is no such thing. So you get the regular ol' barnstar. Redwolf24 21:53, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar. Perhaps for future awardees, we could design a TV Barnstar. Maybe the regular barnstar with a circular 50s TV design in the center. Cromulent Kwyjibo 17:21, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deletionists target Family Guy episode articles

Hey, Cromulent Kwyjibo, just thought you should know a VFD has been convened for the article on the Family Guy episode "Mr. Saturday Knight." ShutterBugTrekker 21:32, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I missed the vote. Cromulent Kwyjibo 19:42, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Future tvshow

File:Future-tv-stub.jpg
New stub picture.

On Wikipedia:Requested images, you requested a picture for Template:Future tvshow. I created Image:Future-tv-stub.jpg. I was wondering, is it what you expected? Thelb4 17:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC) P.S. Sorry about the name - I do so much work in stubs![reply]

Unfortunately, I haven't been able to see it. Wikipedia's being extremely slow with images today and I don't know why. Cromulent Kwyjibo 21:59, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your name

I just have to say I love your name! I love when TV shows create made up words, and what better way than to use two of Simpson's best fake words. Hurricanehink 02:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think those two words describe me pretty well, too. Cromulent Kwyjibo 21:10, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One of the anons provided a source on this episode, considering its from blog.familyguy.com I think its fairly likely not to be a hoax. Discordance 00:49, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is the blog entry from a viewer of the show or is it from a producer of the show? Cromulent Kwyjibo 23:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The episodes director, Zac Moncrief, Road to Rupert was announced by director Dan Povenmire. I wasnt asking for the article not to be deleted i was just making sure the page wasnt locked in case it needs recreating in future. And no the site doesnt appear to be hosted on the familyguy.com server its at sethmacfarlane.org but the fact that it uses a subdomain of familyguy.com means they have permission from fox and fox are willing to associate the blog with the official site.Discordance 01:19, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete redlinks such as the redlink you deleted from Cote de Pablo. Redlinks are perfectly acceptable under Wikipedia policy as they are signals that articles are missing and need to be written. Although a case can be made that wikilinking obscure names is unnecessary, a television series title is fine to leave as a wikilink, especially since there is a WikiProject underway to create articles on these series. There is no onus placed on the person adding the redlink to create the article in question, though on many occasions they will do just that. 23skidoo 23:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. Cromulent Kwyjibo 21:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sibling Rivalry

I used the promotional picture distributed by Fox, you can sometimes find them on FOX's website a few days before the episode aires. --lightdarkness (talk) 22:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for reverting my inadvertant blanking at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of neologisms on Family Guy. I don't know what happened, I'm guessing it was software related. Anway, thanks again, Addhoc 19:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Fitch

It's A7, no assertion of notability. Being a porn star doesn't merit an article, unless they are a particularly significant porn star, and the writing indicates this is a fairly low key porn star, hence not notable. The Lynne Stopkewich article has a small indication of notability that she is particularly known for something, though this may not be enough in itself to keep the article. Tyrenius 03:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your list IS valuable

The list you created is/was up for deletion. I want you to know there is a place for it: http://wikitistics.com . No one will be able to nominate it for deletion because it fits one simple rule: it's a statistic, list, or figure. Good luck with your endeavors! JM

Thanks. Cromulent Kwyjibo 23:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Regarding comments like this[1] and the one left on my talk from before, I would like to remind you to treat all editors in a respectful manner. Thank you, Yanksox 23:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok, just keep those things in mind. I'm stunned that you trust me with personal information, and just wish to extend a hand of "wiki-friendship" reminding you that you can contact me (on my talk or e-mail) if you ever need anything. The best, Yanksox 00:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New epsiode article problems for American dad and Family guy

Two issues. First there is a new format for the articles so just copy in the format from a previously aired episode to avoid confusion. Also, you are using the wrong season code for American Dad episodes

That's exactly what I did, I copied the format from a previously aired episode. As for the season codes, I copied those, too, so that's a carryover mistake. Also, did you know you can sign with four tildes? Cromulent Kwyjibo 23:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what episode did you copy it from intially because that one probably needs to be fixed as well....Grande13 03:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Family Guy Image Placeholder

Yeah im aware the placeholder blows for family guy, so see if you can find some other generic placeholder to replace the current one instead of just removing it. Grande13 02:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chick Cancer

http://www.thefutoncritic.com/listings.aspx?id=20061103fox14

For me that has all the authoritativeness of a Kirk/Spock fanfic. Cromulent Kwyjibo 22:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Family Guy layout

It had been discussed earlier and decided that the order would be cultural references then notes, so everything up to this point has been changed accordingly, sorry to cause any inconveniance Grande13 00:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who discussed it? You all by yourself? Why wasn't I invited to that discussion? Cromulent Kwyjibo 19:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was on one of the episode discussion pages for wikipedia. The standard form was to be used should be alphabetical, so please revert your editsGrande13 20:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

L Reference?

Thanks for your reference for Helena. Any chance you might know of a good reference for List of characters from The L Word? Donnabella 17:10, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Besides Welcome to our Planet? No, sorry. But if you just want to shut up the deletionists right away, we could use that one. Cromulent Kwyjibo 20:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Format

why are you going about reverted the formula for format. It goes alphabetically (Cultural references, notes, trivia, references). Any more violations and you will be reported, as what makes your layout correct? as there are no guidelines that support it 216.177.121.212 20:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetically? Do you even know what that word means? R goes after T? What a stupid idiot! And what makes your layout correctly? Maybe one person is more than five or ten in your weird world view. Cromulent Kwyjibo 20:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Episode Summary

You do realize that the futoncritic gets their press releases from fox right? as the futoncritic usually provides the link to the intial information as well. Well most sites have crappy previews, thefutoncritic should be a reliable one as it only updates its datebases with pressreleases from the networks themselves Grande13 01:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right now I only have your word that "futoncritic gets their press releases from fox." I looked at the website for a few seconds and couldn't find a link to the "initial information" (and being that I'm a kwyjibo I'm not the most tech-savvy person in my household). Cromulent Kwyjibo 00:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"That novel you've been working on?"

In "Brian the Bachelor" Stewie spends two minutes questioning Brian about his novel. There was a later episode where he started to do this again but was stopped. What episode was that? Anton Mravcek 16:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Brian goes back to college." Cromulent Kwyjibo 00:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ada Dietz

I think you've got Ada Dietz all wrong. She's not a "math crank", she's a former math teacher who developed a weaving pattern based on the binomial expansion. She is regarded today by weavers, for the creativity of her designs, and by certain math professors and others interested in the marriage of art and mathematics. I think that you mistakenly afd'd her because her stub was categorized as a "mathematician", a title which she clearly doesn't deserve.

Anyhow, I reworked her article to make it clear that she's a weaver, not a math crank. I'll leave it to you whether to reconsider the afd. Irene Ringworm 04:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Quagmire citation

The offline citation for Glenn Quagmire won't make much of a case. Can you find a statement worth including in the article? Here's an online source: http://bobspoetry.com/Bobs03Ja.pdf

A citation template (perhaps {{Cite web}}) might be good for this. A quote helps plenty. / edgarde 14:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]