User talk:Herostratus

I will usually respond to your messages on your talk page unless otherwise requested.

_

Herostratus: I'm sorry I don't know HTML very well so this might mess up your page. Nonetheless, I wanted to talk to you about an article I have posted several times that you have removed. It is an extremely important part of my historic town's history, and I can unbiasedly say is far more relevant than thousands or articles that are on wikipedia right now. I posted about it biasedly once, and it was removed. I then reposted it with an unbiased description, but it was again removed (the reason given was repost, but it was not a repost). It is very important to me to get this article posted. Can you please find a way to contact me (site won't let me e-mail you). I'd like to figure out what I need to do to get my article posted. I understand your job is difficult, but this article is legitimate. Thank you for your time and please get back to me.

EDIT 1: - The name of the article is "Zeotrope Theatre". Is it possible for me to respond message you in the manner that you messaged me?
EDIT 2: Small world that the editor lives in Franklin. I'm assuming that you can't tell me his/her identity.. but anyway, I feel like the fact that the individual lives in that town clouds his/her ability to judge the the importance of the theater beyond the immediate local area. I don't want to use the fact that there are thousands of far more localized articles on wiki as an argument to allow this one. However, as an expert on the history of the theater, would you allow me some time to rewrite an article for it, focusing on how it is culturally and historically significant beyond the local area, and then reconsider it for posting? Lastly, this is unrelated but where do you make the cutoff for "local"? For example, a landmark that is only important "locally" to a larger city would obviously be allowed. Franklin is a city of 33,000.

User:Kirbytime is requesting pictures of rape, child porn and sex

Like you, I find it alarming to see User:Kirbytime repeatedly requesting pictures of child porn for example like his recent request here which he tried to bring back in after you took it out rightfully. There are tonnes of other requests [1] and interestingly he wanted to know the name of a child model in a sexually controversial image here. AND he's also a member of "Pedophilia Article Watch Project". That would be ok, if he wasnt going around Wikipedia requesting sexually pictures of child and rape. Whats going on? I wonder if there's any Wikipedia policy to deal with this. Is there anything that can be done to put a stop to him? I think an administrator has to come up and recognize the disturbing nature of this editing activity. I think we could make a collection of all his disturbing edits (there are many) and report them in the appropriate manner. Edit: Oh I see, I did not realize that you're an administrator. Well my whole message takes a different meaning now. I only hope that this user can be blocked and that there's some way to deal with his requests for child porn pictures and other stuff. He is definitely trying to test the limits of WP policy, that is for sure. --Matt57 04:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm glad someone noticed. I'll let you know if I notice any more abuse, trolling or disturbing editing activity from him. --Matt57 04:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More talking behind my back. Could you stop it? Stop the defamation.--Ķĩřβȳ♥♥♥ŤįɱéØ 09:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then stop requesting child porn. The Behnam 11:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jürgen Barth

Hi Herostratus, i'm german too ;-)

However, this redirect is useless since it redirects to his father Edgar Barth. Both are racedrivers, but have nothing in common. Please delete Jürgen Barth. -- Stahlkocher 15:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arabella Kennedy (2nd nomination)

Dear Editor, just for your information, redirects do already support redirecting directly to section headers. Test it for yourself using the redirect you created yourself: Arabella Kennedy. Best regards, --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 06:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hah, I was just about to tell him that. You got to it first, Reinoutr! —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 10:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]