Jump to content

User talk:Lil-unique1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ad Orientem (talk | contribs) at 14:24, 4 April 2024 (Reverted edit by Kepin' it FUNKY (talk) to last version by Lil-unique1). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

It is currently 5:41 AM where this user lives.


User:Lil-unique1
User:Lil-unique1
         
User talk:Lil-unique1
User talk:Lil-unique1
         
User:Lil-unique1/Current & Finished Works
User:Lil-unique1/Current & Finished Works
         
User:Lil-unique1/Awards
User:Lil-unique1/Awards
         
User:Lil-unique1/Sandbox
User:Lil-unique1/Sandbox
         
User:Lil-unique1/Templates
User:Lil-unique1/Templates
       
                                                         


This user has tried and failed to take a wikibreak.




Opinion

Hi again! Hope all is well, I have a question and would love your opinion. I’m not too sure how familiar you are with album/single certifications. But I’m in a dispute with an editor regarding certifications, if an album has a ref with its sales but the cert was updated after the article was published what is supposed to be in the box? [1] this user reverted it by bringing up a discussion I opened over 3 years ago regarding this type of issue. Yet I feel like I’m following what they’re stating. Majority of the time I’ve seen most users remove the sales after an updated cert is released due to it being “outdated”. I opened a discussion on their talk page but they’re insinuating that I’m wrong. I have also reached out to an admin due to this being the second incident I’ve had with this user. But I would like to get an opinion from you if you’re able to please, I opened a discussion herePillowdelight (talk) 06:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi lil unique. There's a discussion on the talk page about label in the infobox of The Storm Before the Calm. All you know that the previously discussion about Nuyorican Productions at Talk:Love?/Archive 1. --183.171.121.231 (talk) 08:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evening Standard

Hello. Just wanted to say in response to this summary, we're not using it for factual reporting, merely an opinion, and WP:RSP says there is no consensus on it (which means it can still freely be used) and is considered "more reliable" than other British tabloids (which isn't saying much, I know). I understand tabloids like the Daily Mail were expunged in all instances, including for opinion, but no consensus is no consensus. Technically users can call any news source into question and have it included there after a long discussion. Ss112 16:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112:, granted you're correct here. There are probably better and more qualified reviews out there. >> Lil-unique1 (talk)21:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Uniq. There's recent discussion for suggestion of leave the blank only for interlude as uncredited songwriter/producer. 2001:D08:2930:F7D1:17AE:4429:6506:3DF0 (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Using video thumbnails as cover artworks

Hey Lil-unique1, I just want your opinion as a music editor who also occasionally nominates images for deletion. I'm not sure if you're aware of the musical animated series Hazbin Hotel—but anyway, a few songs from the series have articles here now, and the user who created them has uploaded the thumbnails for the songs' music videos as replacement artworks in the cover= parameter of the infoboxes. I could have sworn (and you might be aware) that there is precedent, an "unspoken rule" if you will, to not use video thumbnails as covers, but as I really don't mark down dates, times and links of previous FFDs where thumbnails that have been used as covers have been deleted it's basically just my word that there is precedent rather than policy or a guideline not to do so. If you feel like offering your opinion, the discussion is at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 February 27#File:Poison Song Cover Image.jpeg. Thanks! Ss112 14:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple durations

Hello. I happened to notice this edit of yours on My House (Beyoncé song). Template:Infobox song doesn't say we can't include multiple versions' lengths like it does for one release date etc; it actually says "If additional lengths are entered, use {{Duration}} for the second and subsequent lengths: {{Duration|3:09}} will produce "3:09"." Ss112 00:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ss112, there's a long standing tradition of not including multiple durations unless its consequential e.g. the single version doesn't have a feature and is longer. Its no biggie if you want to restore it.