Jump to content

User talk:57.133.22.174

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Smalljim (talk | contribs) at 16:24, 6 July 2024 (Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

57.133.22.174 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not using a proxy, and the accusation of "disruptive editing" is outrageous and false. 57.133.22.174 (talk) 16:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not using a proxy, and the accusation of "disruptive editing" is outrageous and false. [[Special:Contributions/57.133.22.174|57.133.22.174]] ([[User talk:57.133.22.174#top|talk]]) 16:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not using a proxy, and the accusation of "disruptive editing" is outrageous and false. [[Special:Contributions/57.133.22.174|57.133.22.174]] ([[User talk:57.133.22.174#top|talk]]) 16:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not using a proxy, and the accusation of "disruptive editing" is outrageous and false. [[Special:Contributions/57.133.22.174|57.133.22.174]] ([[User talk:57.133.22.174#top|talk]]) 16:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

57.133.22.174 (talk) 16:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You want to see disruptive? See a user who is repeatedly reverting clearly explained edits for absolutely no reason; adding messages to talk pages that have already been removed; making false accusations of vandalism; and adding nonsensically bad text to articles. I wonder why you are not in the slightest bit bothered about that. 57.133.22.174 (talk) 16:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you new to Wikipedia? If not, do me a favour and tell me some of the other IPs and/or accounts that you've used.  —Smalljim  16:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You really expect me to respond to such an aggressive assumption of bad faith, that you post after completely ignoring what I wrote above? 57.133.22.174 (talk) 16:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.  —Smalljim  16:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]